Literature DB >> 28707247

Reducing As availability in calcareous soils using nanoscale zero valent iron.

Prisa Azari1, Abdol Amir Bostani2.   

Abstract

Different methods, including the use of nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI), have been used to treat arsenic (As)-contaminated environments, with much less data on the use of NZVI in arsenic-calcareous-polluted soils. Accordingly, two different experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of NZVI on the removal of As from three different calcareous-polluted soils. In the first experiment, the effects of soil type (differing in the rate of clay particles and organic carbon including S1 (8.0 and 0.05%), S2 (20 and 0.2%), and S3 (20.5 and 0.8%)) and NZVI concentration (0, 50, and 100 g kg-1 of dry soil) on the removal of As extractable with distilled water were evaluated using a factorial design with three replicates. In the second experiment, the NZVI concentrations were reduced to 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 25 g kg-1, and the NZVI contact time (0.5, 48, 96, 192, 384, and 768 h) was also tested. The analysis of variance in both experiments indicated the significant effects (P < 0.01) of the experimental treatments on the removal of As. The concentrations of available As in S3 (42.7 mg kg-1), S2 (20.22 mg kg-1), and S1 (24.22 mg kg-1) after using the 50 g kg-1 NZVI treatment decreased to 0, 0, and 0.05 mg kg-1, respectively, which was not significantly different from the 100 g kg-1 NZVI treatment. In the second experiment, using the 25 g kg-1 NZVI treatment, the concentration of available As significantly decreased in S1 from 16.48 to 0.1767 mg kg-1, in S2 from 13.34 to 0.31 mg kg-1, and in S3 from 33.67 to 0.84 mg kg-1. In the three soils, with increasing NZVI concentration and contact time, the concentration of available As in the solution phase significantly decreased (P = 0.01). S3, due to a higher rate of organic matter, was less responsive to the NZVI treatments than the other soils. The effectiveness of the nanoremediation method, tested in this research work, on the stabilization of As in calcareous soils, is verified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic extractants; Arsenic polluted soils; Contact time; Nanoremediation; Properties of soil; Semi metals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707247     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9447-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale zero-valent iron: future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology.

Authors:  R A Crane; T B Scott
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Mobilization of arsenic by dissolved organic matter from iron oxides, soils and sediments.

Authors:  Markus Bauer; Christian Blodau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Application of nanoscale zero valent iron (NZVI) for groundwater remediation in Europe.

Authors:  Nicole C Mueller; Jürgen Braun; Johannes Bruns; Miroslav Černík; Peter Rissing; David Rickerby; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Intraparticle reduction of arsenite (As(III)) by nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) investigated with In Situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Weile Yan; Relja Vasic; Anatoly I Frenkel; Bruce E Koel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions using nanoscale zero valent iron-reduced graphite oxide modified composites.

Authors:  Can Wang; Hanjin Luo; Zilong Zhang; Yan Wu; Jian Zhang; Shaowei Chen
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 6.  Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents--A critical review.

Authors:  Dinesh Mohan; Charles U Pittman
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 7.  Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review.

Authors:  Rachana Singh; Samiksha Singh; Parul Parihar; Vijay Pratap Singh; Sheo Mohan Prasad
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Chemical reactions between arsenic and zero-valent iron in water.

Authors:  Sunbaek Bang; Mark D Johnson; George P Korfiatis; Xiaoguang Meng
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Reactivity of Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron in Unbuffered Systems: Effect of pH and Fe(II) Dissolution.

Authors:  Sungjun Bae; Khalil Hanna
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: a critical assessment of technological solutions.

Authors:  Priyanka Mondal; Subhamoy Bhowmick; Debashis Chatterjee; Alberto Figoli; Bart Van der Bruggen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intercropping efficiency of four arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata populations as intercrops with Morus alba.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wan; Mei Lei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Environmentally Sustainable and Ecosafe Polysaccharide-Based Materials for Water Nano-Treatment: An Eco-Design Study.

Authors:  Ilaria Corsi; Andrea Fiorati; Giacomo Grassi; Irene Bartolozzi; Tiberio Daddi; Lucio Melone; Carlo Punta
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.