Literature DB >> 17324507

Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents--A critical review.

Dinesh Mohan1, Charles U Pittman.   

Abstract

Arsenic's history in science, medicine and technology has been overshadowed by its notoriety as a poison in homicides. Arsenic is viewed as being synonymous with toxicity. Dangerous arsenic concentrations in natural waters is now a worldwide problem and often referred to as a 20th-21st century calamity. High arsenic concentrations have been reported recently from the USA, China, Chile, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Mexico, Argentina, Poland, Canada, Hungary, Japan and India. Among 21 countries in different parts of the world affected by groundwater arsenic contamination, the largest population at risk is in Bangladesh followed by West Bengal in India. Existing overviews of arsenic removal include technologies that have traditionally been used (oxidation, precipitation/coagulation/membrane separation) with far less attention paid to adsorption. No previous review is available where readers can get an overview of the sorption capacities of both available and developed sorbents used for arsenic remediation together with the traditional remediation methods. We have incorporated most of the valuable available literature on arsenic remediation by adsorption ( approximately 600 references). Existing purification methods for drinking water; wastewater; industrial effluents, and technological solutions for arsenic have been listed. Arsenic sorption by commercially available carbons and other low-cost adsorbents are surveyed and critically reviewed and their sorption efficiencies are compared. Arsenic adsorption behavior in presence of other impurities has been discussed. Some commercially available adsorbents are also surveyed. An extensive table summarizes the sorption capacities of various adsorbents. Some low-cost adsorbents are superior including treated slags, carbons developed from agricultural waste (char carbons and coconut husk carbons), biosorbents (immobilized biomass, orange juice residue), goethite and some commercial adsorbents, which include resins, gels, silica, treated silica tested for arsenic removal come out to be superior. Immobilized biomass adsorbents offered outstanding performances. Desorption of arsenic followed by regeneration of sorbents has been discussed. Strong acids and bases seem to be the best desorbing agents to produce arsenic concentrates. Arsenic concentrate treatment and disposal obtained is briefly addressed. This issue is very important but much less discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324507     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  135 in total

1.  Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using dye waste.

Authors:  Shubha Nigam; Padma S Vankar; Krishna Gopal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Use of fly ash agglomerates for removal of arsenic.

Authors:  Izabela Polowczyk; Anna Bastrzyk; Tomasz Koźlecki; Wojciech Sawiński; Piotr Rudnicki; Adam Sokołowski; Zygmunt Sadowski
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Understanding Regeneration of Arsenate-Loaded Ferric Hydroxide-Based Adsorbents.

Authors:  Binod Kumar Chaudhary; James Farrell
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Regenerating an Arsenic Removal Iron-Bed Adsorptive Media System, Part 1: The Regeneration Process.

Authors:  Thomas J Sorg; Abraham S C Chen; Lili Wang; Raymond Kolisz
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2017-05

5.  Modeling Fate and Transport of Arsenic in a Chlorinated Distribution System.

Authors:  Jonathan B Burkhardt; Jeff Szabo; Stephen Klosterman; John Hall; Regan Murray
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.288

6.  Development of bark-based magnetic iron oxide particle (BMIOP), a bio-adsorbent for removal of arsenic (III) from water.

Authors:  Rajesh Manoharrao Dhoble; Pratap Reddy Maddigapu; Anand Govind Bhole; Sadhana Rayalu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  A comprehensive review on removal of arsenic using activated carbon prepared from easily available waste materials.

Authors:  Monoj Kumar Mondal; Ravi Garg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Comparison of PoraPak Rxn RP and XAD-2 adsorbents for monitoring dissolved hydrophobic organic contaminants.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Thomas M Holsen; Xiaoyan Xia; James J Pagano; Bernard S Crimmins; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Recycling of nickel smelter slag for arsenic remediation--an experimental study.

Authors:  Saidur Rahman Chowdhury; Ernest K Yanful; Allen R Pratt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Biosorption of arsenic (III) from aqueous solution by living cells of Bacillus cereus.

Authors:  A K Giri; R K Patel; S S Mahapatra; P C Mishra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.