Neeta Pandit-Taskar1,2, Pat Zanzonico3, Kevin D Staton4, Jorge A Carrasquillo5,2, Diane Reidy-Lagunes6, Serge Lyashchenko4,7, Eva Burnazi4,6, Hanwen Zhang4, Jason S Lewis4,7, Ronald Blasberg7,8, Steven M Larson5,2,7, Wolfgang A Weber5, Shakeel Modak9. 1. Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York pandit-n@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. GI Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 8. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and. 9. Pediatric Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging is currently a mainstay in the evaluation of many neuroendocrine tumors, especially neuroblastoma. 123I-MIBG imaging has several limitations that can be overcome by the use of a PET agent. 18F-meta-fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) is a PET analog of MIBG that may allow for single-day, high-resolution quantitative imaging. We conducted a first-in-human study of 18F-MFBG PET imaging to evaluate the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of 18F-MFBG in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: Ten patients (5 with neuroblastoma and 5 with paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma) received 148-444 MBq (4-12mCi) of 18F-MFBG intravenously followed by serial whole-body imaging at 0.5-1, 1-2, and 3-4 after injection. Serial blood samples (a total of 6) were also obtained starting at 5 min after injection to as late as 4 h after injection; whole-body distribution and blood clearance data, lesion uptake, and normal-tissue uptake were determined, and radiation-absorbed doses to normal organs were calculated using OLINDA. Results: No side effects were seen in any patient after 18F-MFBG injection. Tracer distribution showed prominent activity in the blood pool, liver, and salivary glands that decreased with time. Mild uptake was seen in the kidneys and spleen, which also decreased with time. Urinary excretion was prominent, with an average of 45% of the administered activity in the bladder by 1 h after injection; whole-body clearance was monoexponential, with a mean biologic half-life of 1.95 h, whereas blood clearance was biexponential, with a mean biologic half-life of 0.3 h (58%) for the rapid α phase and 6.1 h (42%) for the slower β phase. The urinary bladder received the highest radiation dose with a mean absorbed dose of 0.186 ± 0.195 mGy/MBq. The mean total-body dose was 0.011 ± 0.011 mGy/MBq, and the effective dose was 0.023 ± 0.012 mSv/MBq. Both skeletal and soft-tissue lesions were visualized with high contrast. The SUVmax (mean ± SD ) of lesions at 1-2 h after injection was 8.6 ± 9.6. Conclusion: Preliminary data show that 18F-MFBG imaging is safe and has favorable biodistribution and kinetics with good targeting of lesions. PET imaging with 18F-MFBG allows for same-day imaging of NETs. 18F-MFBG appears highly promising for imaging of patients with NETs, especially children with neuroblastoma.
123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging is currently a mainstay in the evaluation of many neuroendocrine tumors, especially neuroblastoma. 123I-MIBG imaging has several limitations that can be overcome by the use of a PET agent. 18F-meta-fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) is a PET analog of MIBG that may allow for single-day, high-resolution quantitative imaging. We conducted a first-in-human study of 18F-MFBG PET imaging to evaluate the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of 18F-MFBG in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: Ten patients (5 with neuroblastoma and 5 with paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma) received 148-444 MBq (4-12mCi) of 18F-MFBG intravenously followed by serial whole-body imaging at 0.5-1, 1-2, and 3-4 after injection. Serial blood samples (a total of 6) were also obtained starting at 5 min after injection to as late as 4 h after injection; whole-body distribution and blood clearance data, lesion uptake, and normal-tissue uptake were determined, and radiation-absorbed doses to normal organs were calculated using OLINDA. Results: No side effects were seen in any patient after 18F-MFBG injection. Tracer distribution showed prominent activity in the blood pool, liver, and salivary glands that decreased with time. Mild uptake was seen in the kidneys and spleen, which also decreased with time. Urinary excretion was prominent, with an average of 45% of the administered activity in the bladder by 1 h after injection; whole-body clearance was monoexponential, with a mean biologic half-life of 1.95 h, whereas blood clearance was biexponential, with a mean biologic half-life of 0.3 h (58%) for the rapid α phase and 6.1 h (42%) for the slower β phase. The urinary bladder received the highest radiation dose with a mean absorbed dose of 0.186 ± 0.195 mGy/MBq. The mean total-body dose was 0.011 ± 0.011 mGy/MBq, and the effective dose was 0.023 ± 0.012 mSv/MBq. Both skeletal and soft-tissue lesions were visualized with high contrast. The SUVmax (mean ± SD ) of lesions at 1-2 h after injection was 8.6 ± 9.6. Conclusion: Preliminary data show that 18F-MFBG imaging is safe and has favorable biodistribution and kinetics with good targeting of lesions. PET imaging with 18F-MFBG allows for same-day imaging of NETs. 18F-MFBG appears highly promising for imaging of patients with NETs, especially children with neuroblastoma.
Authors: Hanwen Zhang; Ruimin Huang; NagaVaraKishore Pillarsetty; Daniel L J Thorek; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Inna Serganova; Ronald G Blasberg; Jason S Lewis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Howard M Katzenstein; Susan L Cohn; Richard M Shore; Dianna M E Bardo; Paul R Haut; Marie Olszewski; Jennifer Schmoldt; Dachao Liu; Alfred W Rademaker; Morris Kletzel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zvi Bar-Sever; Lorenzo Biassoni; Barry Shulkin; Grace Kong; Michael S Hofman; Egesta Lopci; Irina Manea; Jacek Koziorowski; Rita Castellani; Ariane Boubaker; Bieke Lambert; Thomas Pfluger; Helen Nadel; Susan Sharp; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hiren V Patel; Arnav Srivastava; Murray D Becker; Toni Beninato; Amanda M Laird; Eric A Singer Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: David Taïeb; Rodney J Hicks; Elif Hindié; Benjamin A Guillet; Anca Avram; Pietro Ghedini; Henri J Timmers; Aaron T Scott; Saeed Elojeimy; Domenico Rubello; Irène J Virgolini; Stefano Fanti; Sona Balogova; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Karel Pacak Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 9.236