S Shams1,2, D Fällmar3, S Schwarz4, L-O Wahlund5,6, D van Westen7, O Hansson8, E-M Larsson3,7, S Haller9. 1. From the Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (S. Shams), Division of Medical Imaging and Technology sara.shams@ki.se. 2. Department of Radiology (S. Shams). 3. Department of Surgical Sciences (D.F., E.-M.L.), Department of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 4. Radiological Sciences (S. Schwarz), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 5. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society (L.-O.W.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Division of Clinical Geriatrics (L.-O.W.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 7. Department of Radiology (E.-M.L., D.v.W.). 8. Memory Clinic (O.H.), Skåne University Hospital and Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 9. Affidea CDRC Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge SA (S.H.), Carouge GE, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are, to date, no MR imaging diagnostic markers for Lewy body dementia. Nigrosome 1, containing dopaminergic cells, in the substantia nigra pars compacta is hyperintense on SWI and has been called the swallow tail sign, disappearing with Parkinson disease. We aimed to study the swallow tail sign and its clinical applicability in Lewy body dementia and hypothesized that the sign would be likewise applicable in Lewy body dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study including 97 patients (mean age, 65 ± 10 years; 46% women), consisting of the following: controls (n = 21) and those with Lewy body dementia (n = 19), Alzheimer disease (n = 20), frontotemporal lobe dementia (n = 20), and mild cognitive impairment (n = 17). All patients underwent brain MR imaging, with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 1.5T (n = 46) and 3T (n = 51). The swallow tail sign was assessed independently by 2 neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.4) between raters. An abnormal swallow tail sign was most common in Lewy body dementia (63%; 95% CI, 41%-85%; P < .001) and had a predictive value only in Lewy body dementia with an odds ratio of 9 (95% CI, 3-28; P < .001). The consensus rating for Lewy body dementia showed a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 79%, a negative predictive value of 89%, and an accuracy of 76%; values were higher on 3T compared with 1.5T. The usefulness of the swallow tail sign was rater-dependent with the highest sensitivity equaling 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The swallow tail sign has diagnostic potential in Lewy body dementia and may be a complement in the diagnostic work-up of this condition.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are, to date, no MR imaging diagnostic markers for Lewy body dementia. Nigrosome 1, containing dopaminergic cells, in the substantia nigra pars compacta is hyperintense on SWI and has been called the swallow tail sign, disappearing with Parkinson disease. We aimed to study the swallow tail sign and its clinical applicability in Lewy body dementia and hypothesized that the sign would be likewise applicable in Lewy body dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study including 97 patients (mean age, 65 ± 10 years; 46% women), consisting of the following: controls (n = 21) and those with Lewy body dementia (n = 19), Alzheimer disease (n = 20), frontotemporal lobe dementia (n = 20), and mild cognitive impairment (n = 17). All patients underwent brain MR imaging, with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 1.5T (n = 46) and 3T (n = 51). The swallow tail sign was assessed independently by 2 neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.4) between raters. An abnormal swallow tail sign was most common in Lewy body dementia (63%; 95% CI, 41%-85%; P < .001) and had a predictive value only in Lewy body dementia with an odds ratio of 9 (95% CI, 3-28; P < .001). The consensus rating for Lewy body dementia showed a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 79%, a negative predictive value of 89%, and an accuracy of 76%; values were higher on 3T compared with 1.5T. The usefulness of the swallow tail sign was rater-dependent with the highest sensitivity equaling 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The swallow tail sign has diagnostic potential in Lewy body dementia and may be a complement in the diagnostic work-up of this condition.
Authors: I G McKeith; D W Dickson; J Lowe; M Emre; J T O'Brien; H Feldman; J Cummings; J E Duda; C Lippa; E K Perry; D Aarsland; H Arai; C G Ballard; B Boeve; D J Burn; D Costa; T Del Ser; B Dubois; D Galasko; S Gauthier; C G Goetz; E Gomez-Tortosa; G Halliday; L A Hansen; J Hardy; T Iwatsubo; R N Kalaria; D Kaufer; R A Kenny; A Korczyn; K Kosaka; V M Y Lee; A Lees; I Litvan; E Londos; O L Lopez; S Minoshima; Y Mizuno; J A Molina; E B Mukaetova-Ladinska; F Pasquier; R H Perry; J B Schulz; J Q Trojanowski; M Yamada Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anna I Blazejewska; Stefan T Schwarz; Alain Pitiot; Mary C Stephenson; James Lowe; Nin Bajaj; Richard W Bowtell; Dorothee P Auer; Penny A Gowland Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kunal P Patel; David T Wymer; Vinay K Bhatia; Ranjan Duara; Chetan D Rajadhyaksha Journal: Radiographics Date: 2020 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Neetu Soni; Manish Ora; Girish Bathla; Chandana Nagaraj; Laura L Boles Ponto; Michael M Graham; Jitender Saini; Yusuf Menda Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.152