Pyeong Hwa Kim1, Da Hyun Lee1, Chong Hyun Suh2, Minjae Kim1, Woo Hyun Shim1, Sang Joon Kim1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. chonghyunsuh@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI in differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) or primary parkinsonism (including IPD and Parkinson-plus syndrome) from healthy/disease controls. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify original articles investigating the diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity for differentiating IPD or primary parkinsonism from healthy/disease control, up to April 3, 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. The proportion of nondiagnostic scan, inter- and intrareader agreement, and the proportion of concordance between clinical laterality and imaging asymmetry were also pooled. RESULTS: Nineteen articles covering 2125 patients (1097 with primary parkinsonism, 1028 healthy/disease controls) were included. For discrimination between IPD and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97). For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97). The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.5-6.9%). The inter- and intrareader agreements were almost perfect, with the pooled coefficients being 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99), respectively. The pooled proportion of concordant cases was 69.3% (95% CI, 58.4-78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI can differentiate IPD or primary parkinsonism from a healthy/disease control group with high accuracy. However, the proportion of non-diagnostic scans is not negligible and must be taken into account. KEY POINTS: • For discrimination between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.96 and 0.95. • For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.87 and 0.93. • The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2%.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI in differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) or primary parkinsonism (including IPD and Parkinson-plus syndrome) from healthy/disease controls. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify original articles investigating the diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity for differentiating IPD or primary parkinsonism from healthy/disease control, up to April 3, 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. The proportion of nondiagnostic scan, inter- and intrareader agreement, and the proportion of concordance between clinical laterality and imaging asymmetry were also pooled. RESULTS: Nineteen articles covering 2125 patients (1097 with primary parkinsonism, 1028 healthy/disease controls) were included. For discrimination between IPD and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97). For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97). The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.5-6.9%). The inter- and intrareader agreements were almost perfect, with the pooled coefficients being 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99), respectively. The pooled proportion of concordant cases was 69.3% (95% CI, 58.4-78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI can differentiate IPD or primary parkinsonism from a healthy/disease control group with high accuracy. However, the proportion of non-diagnostic scans is not negligible and must be taken into account. KEY POINTS: • For discrimination between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.96 and 0.95. • For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.87 and 0.93. • The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2%.
Authors: Ronald B Postuma; Daniela Berg; Matthew Stern; Werner Poewe; C Warren Olanow; Wolfgang Oertel; José Obeso; Kenneth Marek; Irene Litvan; Anthony E Lang; Glenda Halliday; Christopher G Goetz; Thomas Gasser; Bruno Dubois; Piu Chan; Bastiaan R Bloem; Charles H Adler; Günther Deuschl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Stefan T Schwarz; Mohammed Afzal; Paul S Morgan; Nin Bajaj; Penny A Gowland; Dorothee P Auer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240