Yuchao Jiang1, Mingjun Duan2, Xi Chen1, Xin Chang1, Hui He1, YingJia Li1, Cheng Luo3, Dezhong Yao4. 1. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Information in Medicine, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. 2. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Information in Medicine, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; Department of psychiatry, Chengdu Mental Health Center, Institute of Chengdu Brain Science, Chengdu, China. 3. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Information in Medicine, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: chengluo@uestc.edu.cn. 4. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Information in Medicine, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: dyao@uestc.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia (SCH) and depression (DEP) are prevalent psychiatric disorders and share common and distinguished elements in their pathophysiology. A triple network model composed of the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN) and central executive network (CEN) may represent a major abnormality across several psychiatric disorders including SCH and DEP. However, common and distinct dysfunctional patterns between SCH and DEP across three core networks remain unclear. METHOD: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was obtained in 20 patients with SCH, 20 patients with DEP and 20 healthy controls (HC). Both functional connectivity (FC) and Granger causal connectivity across DMN, SN and CEN were evaluated to uncover common and distinct dysfunctional patterns between SCH and DEP. RESULTS: Two patient groups showed identical abnormal causal connectivity between key nodes of DMN and SN, as well as opposing aberrant FC of DMN-CEN and SN-CEN. Compared with HC, the FC between CEN and DMN was increased in SCH while decreased in DEP. Conversely, DEP showed enhanced FC between CEN and SN, whereas SCH showed decreased FC. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small, and all participants were taking medication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified common patterns including dysconnectivity between DMN and SN, which may contribute to shared cognitive and affective impairment in DEP and SCH. Moreover, opposing dysconnectivity patterns of DMN-CEN may be associated with different self-referential processing abnormalities. These opposing dysconnectivity patterns may indicate an unbalanced recruitment between SN and CEN. Therefore, this study provides dysconnectivity patterns to advance the understanding of the triple network model with regard to psychiatric disorders.
BACKGROUND:Schizophrenia (SCH) and depression (DEP) are prevalent psychiatric disorders and share common and distinguished elements in their pathophysiology. A triple network model composed of the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN) and central executive network (CEN) may represent a major abnormality across several psychiatric disorders including SCH and DEP. However, common and distinct dysfunctional patterns between SCH and DEP across three core networks remain unclear. METHOD: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was obtained in 20 patients with SCH, 20 patients with DEP and 20 healthy controls (HC). Both functional connectivity (FC) and Granger causal connectivity across DMN, SN and CEN were evaluated to uncover common and distinct dysfunctional patterns between SCH and DEP. RESULTS: Two patient groups showed identical abnormal causal connectivity between key nodes of DMN and SN, as well as opposing aberrant FC of DMN-CEN and SN-CEN. Compared with HC, the FC between CEN and DMN was increased in SCH while decreased in DEP. Conversely, DEP showed enhanced FC between CEN and SN, whereas SCH showed decreased FC. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small, and all participants were taking medication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified common patterns including dysconnectivity between DMN and SN, which may contribute to shared cognitive and affective impairment in DEP and SCH. Moreover, opposing dysconnectivity patterns of DMN-CEN may be associated with different self-referential processing abnormalities. These opposing dysconnectivity patterns may indicate an unbalanced recruitment between SN and CEN. Therefore, this study provides dysconnectivity patterns to advance the understanding of the triple network model with regard to psychiatric disorders.
Authors: Hui He; Mi Yang; Mingjun Duan; Xi Chen; Yongxiu Lai; Yang Xia; Junming Shao; Bharat B Biswal; Cheng Luo; Dezhong Yao Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.677