| Literature DB >> 28704411 |
Karine Laste Macagnan1, Mariane Igansi Alves2, Amanda Ávila Rodrigues1, Lígia Furlan3, Rosane da Silva Rodrigues3, Patrícia Diaz de Oliveira1, Claire Tondo Vendruscolo1, Angelita da Silveira Moreira1,2,3.
Abstract
Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28704411 PMCID: PMC5507507 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Growth curve of the Ralstonia solanacearum RS strain.
Matrix of the complete factorial design 22.
Coded and real levels as well as response variables obtained for R. solanacearum RS inocula incubated at 32°C and 250 rpm for 24 h in YM culture medium containing different concentrations (g.L-1) of glucose or sucrose.
| Treatments | Variable | OD600nm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | [Sugar] | Glucose | Sucrose | |
| 1 | -1 (5) | -1 (0) | 7.3 | 4.2 |
| 2 | +1 (8) | -1 (0) | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| 3 | -1 (5) | +1 (70) | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| 4 | +1 (8) | +1 (70) | 8.7 | 7.1 |
| 5 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (35) | 7.6 | 21.2 |
| 6 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (35) | 8.1 | 21.9 |
| 7 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (35) | 8.2 | 18.9 |
OD600nm, optical density.
Matrix of the experimental planning CCRD 22.
Coded and real levels as well as values of the response variables obtained for R. solanacearum RS inoculum incubated at 32°C and 250 rpm for 24 h and YM culture medium with sucrose as the carbon source.
| Treat | Independent variables | Dependent variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | [Sucrose] | OD600nm | DCW (g.L-1) | Sugar (g.L-1) | P(3HB) (%) | |
| 1 | -1 (5.8) | -1 (15) | 4.7 | 1.22 | 4.25 | 18.53 |
| 2 | +1 (7.2) | -1 (15) | 9.0 | 2.34 | 8.37 | 28.32 |
| 3 | -1 (5.8) | +1 (45) | 20.3 | 5.27 | 16.98 | 23.12 |
| 4 | +1 (7.2) | +1 (45) | 2.0 | 0.52 | 2.37 | 19.71 |
| 5 | -1.41 (5.7) | 0 (30) | 20.6 | 5.35 | 15.73 | 45.62 |
| 6 | +1.41 (7.3) | 0 (30) | 7.4 | 1.92 | 6.52 | 31.63 |
| 7 | 0 (6.5) | -1.41 (12.9) | 11.2 | 2.91 | 8.11 | 37.39 |
| 8 | 0 (6.5) | +1.41 (47.1) | 15.5 | 4.03 | 12.35 | 41.39 |
| 9 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (30) | 17.7 | 4.54 | 13.78 | 41.99 |
| 10 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (30) | 17 | 4.52 | 13.16 | 39.15 |
| 11 | 0 (6.5) | 0 (30) | 16.2 | 4.53 | 12.87 | 39.33 |
Treat, treatments; OD600nm, optical density; DCW, dry cell weight; sugar, sugar consumption; P(3HB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).
Fig 2Response and contour surfaces as a function of sucrose concentration and pH for OD600nm.
Fig 3Response and contour surfaces as a function of sucrose concentration and pH for DCW.
Fig 4Response and contour surfaces as a function of sucrose concentration and pH for sugar consumption.
Matrix of the experimental planning CCRD 22.
Coded and real levels as well as values of the response variables obtained for R. solanacearum RS inoculum incubated at 32°C and 250 rpm for 24 h and YM culture medium with glucose.
| Treat | Independent variables | Dependent variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | [Glucose] | OD600nm | DCW (g.L-1) | Sugar (g.L-1) | P(3HB) (%) | |
| 1 | -1 (5.5) | -1 (10) | 12.5 | 2.74 | 9.67 | 37.87 |
| 2 | +1 (9.5) | -1 (10) | 7.7 | 1.68 | 7.69 | 38.99 |
| 3 | -1 (5.5) | +1 (50) | 3.0 | 0.22 | 1.78 | 28.99 |
| 4 | +1 (9.5) | +1 (50) | 1.9 | 0.40 | 3.07 | 23.21 |
| 5 | -1.41 (5.2) | 0 (30) | 8.8 | 1.56 | 8.95 | 29.32 |
| 6 | +1.41 (9.8) | 0 (30) | 3.0 | 0.48 | 2.15 | 18.99 |
| 7 | 0 (7.5) | -1.41 (7.2) | 11.4 | 2.69 | 6.95 | 37.19 |
| 8 | 0 (7.5) | +1.41 (52.8) | 1.7 | 0.78 | 4.28 | 11.04 |
| 9 | 0 (7.5) | 0 (30) | 10.3 | 2.38 | 11.06 | 35.23 |
| 10 | 0 (7.5) | 0 (30) | 10.6 | 2.48 | 10.46 | 29.10 |
| 11 | 0 (7.5) | 0 (30) | 10.8 | 2.53 | 10.87 | 32.80 |
Treat, treatment; OD600nm, optical density; DCW, dry cell weight; sugar, sugar consumption; P(3HB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).
Fig 5Response and contour surfaces as a function of glucose concentration and pH for OD600nm.
Fig 6Response and contour surfaces as a function of glucose concentration and pH for DCW.
Fig 7Response and contour surfaces as a function of glucose concentration and pH for sugar consumption.
Responses of the complete experimental design 22 for OD600nm, DCW and sugar consumption obtained from the inoculum of R. solanacearum RS with sucrose, experimentally observed and predicted by the model, and their respective standard deviations.
| Treat | pH | Sucrose | OD600nm | DCW | Sugar Consumption | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs | Model | SD(%) | Obs | Model | SD(%) | Obs | Model | SD(%) | |||
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 4.7 | -1.16 | 124.7 | 1.22 | -0.42 | 134.4 | 4.25 | -1.3 | 130.6 |
| 2 | +1 | -1 | 9.0 | 5.08 | 43.6 | 2.34 | 1.2 | 48.7 | 8.37 | 5.64 | 32.6 |
| 3 | -1 | +1 | 20.3 | 28.8 | -41.9 | 5.27 | 7.34 | -39.3 | 16.98 | 23.8 | -40.16 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | 2.0 | -10.16 | 608.0 | 0.52 | -2.76 | 630.8 | 2.37 | -6.7 | 382.7 |
| 5 | -1.14 | 0 | 20.6 | 17.89 | 13.2 | 5.35 | 4.52 | 15.5 | 15.73 | 14.6 | 7.2 |
| 6 | +1.14 | 0 | 7.4 | -5.17 | 169.9 | 1.92 | -1.46 | 176.0 | 6.52 | -2.0 | 130.7 |
| 7 | 0 | -1.14 | 11.2 | -0.14 | 101.3 | 2.91 | -0.15 | 105.2 | 8.11 | 0.01 | 99.9 |
| 8 | 0 | +1.14 | 15.5 | 10.24 | 33.9 | 4.03 | 2.53 | 37.2 | 12.35 | 9.01 | 27.0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 17.7 | 16.98 | 4.1 | 4.54 | 4.53 | 0.2 | 13.78 | 13.28 | 3.63 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 16.98 | 0.1 | 4.52 | 4.53 | -0.2 | 13.16 | 13.28 | -0.9 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 16.98 | -4.8 | 4.53 | 4.53 | 0.0 | 12.87 | 13.28 | -3.18 |
Treat, treatments; Obs, responses experimentally observed; model, results of predictive model; SD, relative standard deviation; OD600nm, optical density; DCW, dry cell weight.
Responses of the complete experimental design 22 for OD600nm, DCW and sugar consumption, obtained from the inoculum of R. solanacearum RS with glucose, experimentally observed and predicted by the model and their respective standard deviations.
| Treat | pH | Sucrose | OD600nm | DCW | Sugar Consumption | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs | Model | SD(%) | Obs | Model | SD(%) | Obs | Model | SD(%) | |||
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 12.5 | 14.55 | -16.4 | 2.74 | 3.01 | -9.9 | 9.67 | 8.6 | 11.1 |
| 2 | +1 | -1 | 7.7 | 3.79 | 50.8 | 1.68 | 0.57 | 66.1 | 7.69 | 0.18 | 97.6 |
| 3 | -1 | +1 | 3.0 | -3.67 | 222.3 | 0.22 | -1.49 | 777.3 | 1.78 | -2.82 | 258.4 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | 1.9 | -7.03 | 470.0 | 0.40 | -1.45 | 462.5 | 3.07 | -4.72 | 253.7 |
| 5 | -1.14 | 0 | 8.8 | 6.29 | 28.5 | 1.56 | 0.31 | 80.1 | 8.95 | 3.94 | 56.0 |
| 6 | +1.14 | 0 | 3.0 | -3.67 | 222.3 | 0.48 | -1.39 | 389.6 | 2.15 | -3.34 | 255.3 |
| 7 | 0 | -1.14 | 11.4 | 12.86 | -12.8 | 2.69 | 3.19 | -18.6 | 6.95 | 6.2 | 10.8 |
| 8 | 0 | +1.14 | 1.7 | -7.62 | 548.2 | 0.78 | -1.41 | 280.8 | 4.28 | -5.3 | 223.8 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 10.3 | 10.57 | -2.6 | 2.38 | 2.46 | -3.4 | 11.06 | 10.8 | 2.3 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 10.6 | 10.57 | 0.3 | 2.48 | 2.46 | 0.8 | 10.46 | 10.8 | -3.2 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 10.8 | 10.57 | 2.1 | 2.53 | 2.46 | 2.8 | 10.87 | 10.8 | 0.6 |
Treat, treatments; Obs, responses experimentally observed; model, results of predictive model; SD, relative standard deviation; OD600nm, optical density; DCW, dry cell weight.