| Literature DB >> 28703421 |
C Gaykwad1, J Garkhal1, G E Chethan1, S Nandi2, U K De1.
Abstract
Previously, antioxidants have not been evaluated for treatment of parvoviral diarrhea in dogs. In this study, antioxidant potential of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in dogs infected with canine parvovirus with a nonblinded randomized clinical trial has been carried out. A total 18 parvo-infected dogs were randomly divided into two groups: nine parvo-infected dogs were treated with supportive treatment and nine parvo-infected dogs were treated with NAC along with supportive treatment. Simultaneously, nine healthy dogs were kept as healthy control. In parvo-infected dogs, marked hemoconcentration, leucopenia, neutropenia and oxidative stress were noticed compared to healthy dogs. The NAC treatment progressively improved the leukocyte, neutrophil, monocyte, and eosinophil counts over the time in parvovirus-infected dogs compared to dogs that received only supportive treatment. In addition, NAC treatment significantly improved glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity and decreased nitrite plus nitrate (NOx) and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations on day 3 and 5 compared to supportive treatment in parvo-infected dogs. However, supportive treatment alone failed to ameliorate oxidative stress in the infected dogs till day 5. The results of this study suggest that NAC represents a potential additional treatment option that could be considered to improve the health condition and minimize the duration of hospitalization in case of canine parvoviral diarrhea.Entities:
Keywords: N-acetylcysteine; canine parvovirus; dog; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28703421 PMCID: PMC7166929 DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Pharmacol Ther ISSN: 0140-7783 Impact factor: 1.786
Figure 1Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products for identification of VP2 gene of canine parvovirus in fecal samples collected from dogs suffering from hemorrhagic gastroenteritis. Lane M denotes 100‐bp DNA ladder, lane 1 denotes negative control (no template), lane 2 denotes positive control (product size 681 bp), lanes 3–7 denotes positive for canine parvovirus in fecal samples
Figure 2Changes of hemogram (Hb and RBC count) over time in nine healthy dogs (Group A), nine parvoinfected dogs treated with supportive treatment (ST, Group B) and nine parvo‐infected dogs treated with ST plus N‐acetylcysteine (NAC, Group C). The data were analyzed by Tukey's Post Hoc test using repeated measure analysis. A statistically significant interaction was found between treatment and Hb (p = .000) and RBC count (p = .020). Superscripts A, B between the groups within a day and superscripts a, b between the days within the group differ significantly (p < .05)
Changes in leukogram kinetics over time in nine healthy dogs (Group A), nine parvo‐infected dogs treated with supportive treatment ST (ST, Group B) and nine parvo‐infected dogs treated with supportive treatment plus N‐acetylcysteine (ST‐NAC, Group C)
| Groups | Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 7.331 ± 0.581A | 8.084 ± 0.580A | 7.843 ± 0.711A |
| Gr. B | 3.822 ± 0.385B | 4.221 ± 0.325B | 4.363 ± 0.413B |
| Gr. C | 3.978 ± 0.382B,a | 4.965 ± 0.566B,a | 6.364 ± 0.466A,b |
| Neutrophil (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 4.611 ± 0.421A | 4.913 ± 0.418A | 4.784 ± 0.452A |
| Gr. B | 1.487 ± 0.149B | 1.684 ± 0.150B | 2.113 ± 0.317B |
| Gr. C | 1.637 ± 0.158B,a | 2.290 ± 0.265B,b | 3.551 ± 0.189C,c |
| Lymphocyte (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 2.006 ± 0.172A | 2.368 ± 0.190A | 2.307 ± 0.280A |
| Gr. B | 1.939 ± 0.195A | 2.105 ± 0.189A | 1.822 ± 0.152A |
| Gr. C | 1.977 ± 0.202A | 2.083 ± 0.269A | 2.144 ± 0.366A |
| Monocyte (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 0.502 ± 0.042A | 0.579 ± 0.035A | 0.533 ± 0.045A |
| Gr. B | 0.288 ± 0.036B | 0.346 ± 0.047B | 0.324 ± 0.026B |
| Gr. C | 0.251 ± 0.028B,a | 0.425 ± 0.059AB,b | 0.475 ± 0.035AB,b |
| Eosinophil (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 0.179 ± 0.032A | 0.184 ± 0.030A | 0.207 ± 0.024A |
| Gr. B | 0.103 ± 0.012B | 0.108 ± 0.012B | 0.093 ± 0.010B |
| Gr. C | 0.097 ± 0.011B,a | 0.133 ± 0.019AB,ab | 0.154 ± 0.023AB,b |
| Basophil (×103 cells/μl) | |||
| Gr. A | 0.024 ± 0.012A | 0.016 ± 0.011A | 0.043 ± 0.014A |
| Gr. B | 0.003 ± 0.003A | 0.012 ± 0.006A | 0.009 ± 0.006A |
| Gr. C | 0.014 ± 0.007A | 0.032 ± 0.017A | 0.038 ± 0.009A |
The data were analyzed by Tukey's post hoc test using repeated measure analysis. A statistically significant interaction was found between treatment and monocyte count (p = .049), but such interaction was not present for TLC (p = .281), neutrophil count (p = .054), lymphocyte count (p = .886), eosinophil count (p = .771) and basophil count (p = .824).
The values were expressed as mean ± SEM.
Superscripts A, B, C between the groups within a day and superscripts a, b, c between the days within a group differ significantly (p < .05).
Figure 3Changes of GST activity, MDA and NOx concentrations over time in nine healthy dogs (Group A), nine parvo‐infected dogs treated with supportive treatment (ST, Group B) and nine parvo‐infected dogst reated with ST plus N‐acetylcysteine (NAC, Group C). The mean GST activity significantly elevated on day 5 (p = .035) from pretreatment value (day 0) in ST‐NAC treated dogs, whereas no significant changes was observed in parvo‐infected dogs received ST only. The average MDA and NOx concentrations significantly reduced on day 5 (p = .035, .039) from pretreatment value (day 0) in ST‐NAC treated dogs, whereas no significant changes was observed in parvo‐infected dogs received ST only. A statistically significant interaction was found between treatment and NOx concentration (p = .036) but, such interaction was not present for GST activity (p = .063) and MDA concentrations (p = .100). Superscripts A, B between the groups within a day and superscripts a, b between the days within the group differ significantly (p < .05)