| Literature DB >> 28702911 |
Abstract
Radionuclide concentration analysis of total moss bodies often gave relatively different results than a separate analysis of each different morphological part of the same sample. The dynamics of the transfer of metals by dust uplifted from the soil and another approach, based on the diffusion of the two radionuclides to the moss, have been analyzed. In the proposed model, short- and long-term approaches have been applied. Each part of a moss's profile can show different radionuclides accumulation ability, including both 210Pb and 210Po isotopes. A first-order kinetic model has been used for 210Po and 210Pb transport between three body components of mosses. This mathematical approach has been applied for 210Po activity concentration in the air estimation. For relatively clean deep forest region, calculated concentrations were from 17.2 to 43.8 μBqm-3, while for urban air concentrations were higher from 49.1 to 104.9 μBqm-3.Entities:
Keywords: 210Po and 210Pb in the air; Accumulation rate; Biomarkers; Biosorption; First-order kinetic; Low background spectrometry; Pleurozium schreberi; Radionuclide distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28702911 PMCID: PMC5574946 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9659-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Three compartment models of moss body vertical profile for Pb and Po bioaccumulation
Results of estimation of 210Po kinetic parameters X in [Bq kg−1] and [μBq m−3], in eight moss profiles (with assumption dust concentration equal 40 μgm−3)
| Sample no. | Linear equation |
| λw1 + λt1 [day−1] | λd [day−1] |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | y = 0.781× + 67.48 | 0.776 | 0.77 | 1.08 | 813 | 32.5 |
| #2 | y = 0.593× + 101.9 | 0.999 | 0.59 | 0.89 | 1095 | 43.8 |
| #3 | y = 0.460× + 123.2 | 0.995 | 0.46 | 0.76 | 778 | 31.1 |
| #4 | y = 0.917× + 110.2 | 0.994 | 0.91 | 1.22 | 431 | 17.2 |
| #5 | y = 0.856× + 58.61 | 0.999 | 0.85 | 1.16 | 530 | 21.2 |
| #6 | y = 2.091× − 178.1 | 0.780 | 2.08 | 2.39 | 2621 | 105 |
| #7 | y = 1.457× − 146.7 | 0.983 | 1.45 | 1.76 | 2025 | 81.0 |
| #8 | y = 0.958× − 41.05 | 0.976 | 0.95 | 1.26 | 1226 | 49.1 |
Fig. 2210Po activity changes in time a 210Po/210Pb = 1 b 210Po/210Pb = 0.1