| Literature DB >> 22593608 |
Andrzej Kłos, Marcin Czora, Małgorzata Rajfur, Maria Wacławek.
Abstract
The mechanisms for translocation of heavy metals from soil to epigeal mosses were investigated. The first mechanism was demonstrated for (137)Cs and involved the uplifting of the pollutant-containing dust from the soil, followed by the local secondary deposition on surfaces of epigeal mosses and epiphytic lichens. The second mechanism involved the diffusion of metal cations from the soil through water wetting the moss into the gametophyte. The mechanism was demonstrated by measuring the electric conductance of wetted gametophytes with single ends immersed in solutions of Cu and Na salts. In addition, the concentrations of Cu and Cd were compared in moss samples exposed to the natural soil and to the soil contaminated with the metals. The exposition to the contaminated soil resulted in the statistically significant increase of metal concentrations in the gametophytes.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22593608 PMCID: PMC3332361 DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-0987-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Air Soil Pollut ISSN: 0049-6979 Impact factor: 2.520
Fig. 1a, b Setups for the laboratory experiments
Fig. 2The site for the field experiments
Measured and certified values of Cu and Cd concentration in BCR 482 lichen reference material
| Element | Certified value | ±Uncertainty | Mean | ±SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μg g−1 d.m. | |||||
| Cu | 7.03 | 0.19 | 6.54 | 0.18 | −7.0 |
| Cd | 0.56 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 0.04 | −6.3 |
aDeviation—a difference between a measured value and a certified value, divided by the certified value
d.m. dry mass
Fig. 3Kinetics of 137Cs translocation from soil to mosses and lichens
Fig. 4Changes in time of the relative electric conductance G/G 0 of a wetted gametophyte with one end immersed in aqueous solution of a CuSO4 and b NaCl
Concentrations of Cu and Cd accumulated in gametophytes exposed for 10 days to soil contaminated with these metals (displayed errors are standard deviations)
| Metal | Metal concentration (μg g−1 d.m.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil | Moss | |||
| Control sample | Sample | Control sample | Sample | |
| Cu | 4.32 ± 0.18 | 120 ± 12 | 12.62 ± 0.78 | 19.3 ± 7.0 |
| Cd | 1.35 ± 0.18 | 13.1 ± 1.1 | 1.75 ± 0.16 | 2.35 ± 0.08 |
| 26.20 ± 0.96 | 4.25 ± 0.18 | |||
Concentrations of Cd accumulated in gametophytes exposed for 2 months under field conditions (displayed errors are standard deviations)
| Sample | Concentration of Cd (μg g−1 d.m.) |
|---|---|
| Forest soil | 1.49 ± 0.28 |
| Contaminated soil | 7.11 ± 0.44 |
| Moss from the forest | 1.80 ± 0.22 |
| Moss from the box | 2.98 ± 0.18 |