Literature DB >> 28702750

Function and activity after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to a healthy population.

Eberhard von Rottkay1, Lars Rackwitz1, Maximilian Rudert2, Ulrich Nöth3, Johannes Christian Reichert1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the daily activity and functionality in a patient cohort 12 months after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a direct anterior approach with a healthy non-operated control population.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients who underwent THA and 59 healthy individuals (control) were assessed regarding their daily activity and joint functionality utilizing the Harris hip score (HHS), the extra short musculoskeletal functional assessment questionnaire (XSFMA), the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey and a Stepwatch™ Activity Monitor (SAM). Post-operative x-ray images after THA were analysed regarding inclination and stem positioning.
RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, the average HHS showed no significant difference between both groups equalling 90.7 points in the THA patient group and 90.8 in the healthy volunteer group. The XSFMA functional index scores were 11.0 (THA) and 5.0 (control) while the bother index summed up to a score of 15.3 (THA) and 7.6 (control) respectively thus differing significantly (p < 0.001). Daily activity equalled 4227 (THA) and 4687 (control) load cycles per day (p = 0.327) while a number of 5658 (THA) and 6417 (control) steps per day (p = 0.011) was recorded. The SF-36 physical component scores were 47.3 (THA) and 50.6 (control) points while the psychometric properties added up to a score of 56.1 (THA) and 55.9 (control). The physical component was determined to be significantly different (p < 0.001) whereas no statistically significant difference could be shown for the psychometric properties (p = 0.511). The radiographic analysis revealed an average cup inclination of 39.9° without signs of migration. Stem positioning was neutral in 53% of all cases while 36% were graded varus and 11% valgus.
CONCLUSION: In summary, our short-term results show an activity, functionality and quality of life for patients one year after THA comparable to healthy control individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct anterior approach; Healthy population; Minimally invasive; Outcome; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28702750     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3541-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeru Nakamura; K Matsuda; N Arai; N Wakimoto; T Matsushita
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [MRI-based measurement of muscle damage after minimally invasive hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Lüdemann; J Kreutner; D Haddad; W Kenn; M Rudert; U Nöth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R H Fitzgerald; W H Harris; R Poss; M E Müller; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Maximilian R Volkmann; Maximilian Koppmair; Lars Rackwitz; Martin Lüdemann; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach.

Authors:  Sascha Goebel; Andre F Steinert; Judith Schillinger; Jochen Eulert; Jens Broscheit; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique.

Authors:  Riaz J K Khan; Daniel Fick; Paul Khoo; Felix Yao; Bo Nivbrant; David Wood
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results.

Authors:  J M Laffosse; P Chiron; F Molinier; H Bensafi; J Puget
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table.

Authors:  Joel M Matta; Cambize Shahrdar; Tania Ferguson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Evaluation of the Extra Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire XSMFA-D in patients with musculoskeletal disorders and surgical or medical in-patient treatment].

Authors:  N Wollmerstedt; H Faller; H Ackermann; J Schneider; M Glatzel; S Kirschner; A König
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.113

10.  The Daily Activity Questionnaire: a novel questionnaire to assess patient activity after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicole Wollmerstedt; Uli Nöth; Akif Ince; Hanns Ackermann; John M Martell; Christian Hendrich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  6 in total

1.  The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Louis de Jong; Taco M A L Klem; Tjallingius M Kuijper; Gert R Roukema
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Nicola Santori; Francesco Falez; Domenico Potestio; Francesco Saverio Santori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Marco Villano; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Sleep improvement after hip arthroplasty: a study on short-stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Josef Hochreiter; Harald Kindermann; Mattiassich Georg; Reinhold Ortmaier; Marian Mitterer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an earlier return to work compared to a straight-stem design.

Authors:  Georg Hauer; Maria Smolle; Sabrina Zaussinger; Joerg Friesenbichler; Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Amount and type of physical activity and sports from one year forward after hip or knee arthroplasty-A systematic review.

Authors:  Yvet Mooiweer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.