Literature DB >> 28702529

Assessing chemotherapeutic effectiveness using a paper-based tumor model.

Matthew W Boyce1, Gabriel J LaBonia2, Amanda B Hummon2, Matthew R Lockett3.   

Abstract

In vitro models for screening new cancer chemotherapeutics often rely on two-dimensional cultures to predict therapeutic potential. Unfortunately, the predictive power of these models is limited, as they fail to recapitulate the complex three-dimensional environments in tumors that promote a chemoresistant phenotype. In this study, we describe the preparation and characterization of paper-based cultures (PBCs) engineered to assess chemotherapeutic effectiveness in three dimensional, diffusion-limited environments. Similar environments are found in poorly vascularized tumors. Monotonic gradients develop across these cultures, which are assembled by stacking cell-laden paper scaffolds to yield thick tissue-like structures, and provide distinct chemical environments for each scaffold. After prolonged incubation, the scaffolds can simply be peeled apart and analyzed. Through fluorescence imaging, we determined that viable and proliferative cell populations were most abundant in scaffolds close to the nutrient-rich medium. By adjusting the cell density, we modulated the spatiotemporal evolution of oxygen gradients across the cultures and correlated these environmental changes with cellular sensitivity to SN-38 exposure. From these results, we showed that differences in the oxygen gradients produced cellular populations with significantly different chemosensitivities. Through this work, we highlight PBCs ability to serve as an analytical model capable of determining chemotherapeutic effectiveness under a range of chemical environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28702529      PMCID: PMC5557652          DOI: 10.1039/c7an00806f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  49 in total

1.  Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices.

Authors:  Kirsi M Hakkinen; Jill S Harunaga; Andrew D Doyle; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Real-time imaging of cancer cell chemotaxis in paper-based scaffolds.

Authors:  Rachael M Kenney; Matthew W Boyce; Andrew S Truong; C Robert Bagnell; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Oxygen diffusion and consumption in extracellular matrix gels: implications for designing three-dimensional cultures.

Authors:  Adai Colom; Roland Galgoczy; Isaac Almendros; Antonio Xaubet; Ramon Farré; Jordi Alcaraz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoshinori Imamura; Toru Mukohara; Yohei Shimono; Yohei Funakoshi; Naoko Chayahara; Masanori Toyoda; Naomi Kiyota; Shintaro Takao; Seishi Kono; Tetsuya Nakatsura; Hironobu Minami
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 5.  Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 6.  Drug penetration in solid tumours.

Authors:  Andrew I Minchinton; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Quantitative determination of irinotecan and the metabolite SN-38 by nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in different regions of multicellular tumor spheroids.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Emergent properties of tumor microenvironment in a real-life model of multicell tumor spheroids.

Authors:  Edoardo Milotti; Roberto Chignola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of therapeutics in three-dimensional cell culture systems by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Eric M Weaver; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  From competency to dormancy: a 3D model to study cancer cells and drug responsiveness.

Authors:  Josephine Y Fang; Shih-Jye Tan; Yi-Chen Wu; Zhi Yang; Ba X Hoang; Bo Han
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fry; Jacqueline Bangma; John Szilagyi; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Tracking the invasion of breast cancer cells in paper-based 3D cultures by OCT motility analysis.

Authors:  Julie C McIntosh; Lin Yang; Ting Wang; Haibo Zhou; Matthew R Lockett; Amy L Oldenburg
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  A pH-Sensing Optode for Mapping Spatiotemporal Gradients in 3D Paper-Based Cell Cultures.

Authors:  Rachael M Kenney; Matthew W Boyce; Nathan A Whitman; Brenden P Kromhout; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Hypoxia differentially regulates estrogen receptor alpha in 2D and 3D culture formats.

Authors:  Nathan A Whitman; Zhi-Wei Lin; Rachael M Kenney; Leonardo Albertini; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Developing a Drug Screening Platform: MALDI-Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Paper-Based Cultures.

Authors:  Fernando Tobias; Julie C McIntosh; Gabriel J LaBonia; Matthew W Boyce; Matthew R Lockett; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Screening Estrogen Receptor Modulators in a Paper-Based Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Nathan A Whitman; Zhi-Wei Lin; Thomas J DiProspero; Julie C McIntosh; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  A three-dimensional engineered heterogeneous tumor model for assessing cellular environment and response.

Authors:  Darren Rodenhizer; Teresa Dean; Bin Xu; Dan Cojocari; Alison P McGuigan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Physiologically relevant oxygen tensions differentially regulate hepatotoxic responses in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Thomas J DiProspero; Erin Dalrymple; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.685

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.