Literature DB >> 28701853

Low incidence of failure after proximal biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button.

Jay B Cook1, David M Sedory1, Michael C Freidl1, Douglas R Adams1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent interest in suture button fixation has developed with regard to proximal biceps tenodesis fixation. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated viability of a unicortical suture button technique in vitro. Despite this, no clinical data has been reported to validate the biomechanical data. The purpose of this study is to report on complication and failure rates in the early postoperative period after bicep tenodesis with a unicortical suture button.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all biceps tenodesis performed at our institution over a 36-month period using a unicortical suture button for fixation. All included patients had a minimum 12 weeks follow up. Failures were defined as complete loss of fixation, change in biceps contour during the early postoperative period, acute pain at the tenodesis site, or acute loss of supination strength.
RESULTS: 145 of 166 biceps tenodesis procedures performed by the 4 surgeons at our institution met inclusion criteria. 80.1% of the patients were active duty military at the time of surgery. The average age was 38.2 years. There were 7 total complications (4.8%), including one failure (0.7%) requiring revision.
CONCLUSION: Failure and complication rates in the early postoperative period using a unicortical suture button for biceps tenodesis fixation are consistent with other reported techniques. This study adds clinical data to the existing biomechanical reports that this technique is strong enough to provide stable fixation of the biceps tendon to allow healing of the tendon to the humerus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps tenodesis; Complications; Failure rate; Subpectoral; Suture button

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701853      PMCID: PMC5496482          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter.

Authors:  Paul M Sethi; Arun Rajaram; Knut Beitzel; Thomas R Hackett; David M Chowaniec; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Long-term morphology of a healing bone-tendon interface: a histological observation in the sheep model.

Authors:  R Newsham-West; H Nicholson; M Walton; P Milburn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  DISLOCATION AND ELONGATION OF THE LONG HEAD OF THE BICEPS BRACHII: AN ANALYSIS OF SIX CASES.

Authors:  E L Gilcreest
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1936-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Matthew T Provencher; Lance E LeClere; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Arne Buchholz; Frank Martetschläger; Sebastian Siebenlist; Gunther H Sandmann; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Andreas Lenich; Peter J Millett; Ulrich Stöckle; Florian Elser
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A humerus fracture in a baseball pitcher after biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Eric J Dein; Gazi Huri; John C Gordon; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Matthew L Lyons; Cody L Evans; Justin W Griffin; Joseph M Hart; Mark D Miller; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Trends in long head biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Stephen F Brockmeier; F Winston Gwathmey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  David P Beason; Jay P Shah; James W Duckett; Patrick W Jost; Glenn S Fleisig; E Lyle Cain
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Low incidence of tendon rerupture after distal biceps repair by cortical button and interference screw.

Authors:  Michael C Cusick; Benjamin J Cottrell; Richard A Cain; Mark A Mighell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The rate and reporting of fracture after biceps tenodesis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hailey P Huddleston; Joey S Kurtzman; Samuel Gedailovich; Steven M Koehler; William R Aibinder
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 2.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Injuries to the Biceps and Superior Labral Complex in Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Jacob G Calcei; Venkat Boddapati; David W Altchek; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

3.  Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Brian Forsythe; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Randy Mascarenhas; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.