| Literature DB >> 28700659 |
Pei-Feng Liu1, Yu-Chang Hu2, Bor-Hwang Kang3,4, Yu-Kai Tseng5,6, Pi-Chuang Wu7, Chi-Chuang Liang7, Yu-Yi Hou3, Ting-Ying Fu8, Huei-Han Liou1, I-Chien Hsieh8, Luo-Ping Ger1,9, Chih-Wen Shu1.
Abstract
Apoptosis plays a dual role in cancer development and malignancy. The role of apoptosis-related caspases in cancer remains controversial, particularly in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). In this study, we examined the protein levels of cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 on tissue microarrays consisting of samples from 246 OTSCC patients by immunohistochemistry. Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated that the protein levels of cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 in tumor tissues were significantly higher compared to those in adjacent normal tissues (all p<0.001). The expression level of caspase-8 in tumors was elevated in patients with lymph node invasion. Moreover, positive expression of cleaved caspase-3 was associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) in OTSCC patients with moderate differentiation and lymph node invasion. Combination of either positive cleaved caspase-3 or higher caspase-3 expression or both was associated with poor DFS. Interestingly, stratification analysis showed that co-expression levels of positive cleaved caspase-3 or/and higher caspase-3 were associated with better disease-specific survival in patients with advanced stages of the disease, such as large tumor size and lymph node invasion, whereas it was associated with poor DFS in OTSCC patients with moderate cell differentiation and small tumor size. Taken together, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3/8/9 could be biomarkers for tumorigenesis in OTSCC patients. The co-expression level of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3 might be a prognostic biomarker for OTSCC patients, particular in those patients with certain tumor stages and cell differentiation status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28700659 PMCID: PMC5503265 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Protein levels of caspases in OTSCC.
The staining intensity of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3, A), caspase-3 (C-3, B), caspase-8 (C-8, C) and caspase-9 (C-9, D) in the OTSCC tissues were scored according to the representative slides. 0 = no signal; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong.
The comparisons of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3), caspase-3 (C-3), caspase-8 (C-8) and caspase-9 (C-9) expression in the tumor and tumor adjacent normal tissues of OTSCC patients.
| Variables | No. | Tumor adjacent normal | Tumor | Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean±SD | Median | mean±SD | Median | ||||
| CC-3 | 203 | 0.03±0.27 | 0.00 | 1.18±1.17 | 1.00 | 9.514 | |
| C-3 | 204 | 3.49±1.54 | 4.00 | 4.70±1.45 | 5.00 | 8.037 | |
| C-8 | 200 | 6.17±1.25 | 7.00 | 6.62±0.64 | 7.00 | 5.806 | |
| C-9 | 211 | 4.65±1.89 | 5.00 | 5.44±1.17 | 6.00 | 5.856 | |
Abbreviations: TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma; SD, standard deviation.
*p-values were estimated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Association of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3), caspase-3 (C-3), caspase-8 (C-8) and caspase-9 (C-9) expression levels with demographical characteristics and pathological outcomes of OTSCC patients (base of tongue was excluded).
| Variable | No. (%) | CC-3 | C-3 | C-8 | C-9 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Median | Mean±SD | Median | Mean±SD | Median | Mean±SD | Median | ||||||
| Sex | |||||||||||||
| Female | 29 (11.8) | 0.86±1.09 | 0.00 | 0.115 | 4.93±1.33 | 5.00 | 0.369 | 6.76±0.51 | 7.00 | 0.246 | 5.93±0.84 | 6.00 | |
| Male | 217 (88.2) | 1.23±1.17 | 1.00 | 4.67±1.47 | 5.00 | 6.60±0.65 | 7.00 | 5.37±1.19 | 5.00 | ||||
| Age, y | |||||||||||||
| ≦40 | 47 (19.1) | 1.19±1.14 | 1.00 | 0.965 | 4.28±1.42 | 4.00 | 6.68±0.59 | 7.00 | 5.62±1.13 | 6.00 | 0.578 | ||
| 41–50 | 79 (32.1) | 1.19±1.18 | 1.00 | 4.57±1.64 | 5.00 | 6.80±0.46 | 7.00 | 5.47±1.16 | 6.00 | ||||
| 51–60 | 67 (27.2) | 1.22±1.08 | 1.00 | 5.01±1.29 | 5.00 | 6.57±0.68 | 7.00 | 5.31±1.17 | 5.00 | ||||
| >60 | 53 (21.5) | 1.11±1.30 | 1.00 | 4.89±1.28 | 5.00 | 6.38±0.77 | 7.00 | 5.40±1.21 | 5.00 | ||||
| Cell differentiation | |||||||||||||
| Well | 26 (10.6) | 1.08±1.09 | 1.00 | 5.04±1.22 | 5.00 | 0.281 | 6.54±0.71 | 7.00 | 0.642 | 5.31±1.19 | 5.50 | ||
| Moderate | 203 (82.5) | 1.26±1.19 | 1.00 | 4.64±1.47 | 5.00 | 6.62±0.64 | 7.00 | 5.38±1.17 | 5.00 | ||||
| Poor | 17 (6.9) | 0.47±0.72 | 0.00 | 5.00±1.46 | 5.00 | 6.76±0.44 | 7.00 | 6.29±0.77 | 6.00 | ||||
| AJCC pathological stage | |||||||||||||
| I, II | 167 (67.9) | 1.17±1.16 | 1.00 | 0.856 | 4.65±1.41 | 5.00 | 0.428 | 6.57±0.66 | 7.00 | 0.071 | 5.43±1.19 | 5.00 | 0.787 |
| III, IV | 79 (32.1) | 1.20±1.18 | 1.00 | 4.81±1.54 | 5.00 | 6.72±0.58 | 7.00 | 5.47±1.13 | 6.00 | ||||
| T classification | |||||||||||||
| T1, T2 | 194 (78.9) | 1.21±1.17 | 1.00 | 0.461 | 4.70±1.41 | 5.00 | 0.878 | 6.61±0.64 | 7.00 | 0.517 | 5.45±1.19 | 5.50 | 0.706 |
| T3, T4 | 52 (21.1) | 1.08±1.17 | 1.00 | 4.73±1.62 | 5.00 | 6.67±0.62 | 7.00 | 5.38±1.11 | 6.00 | ||||
| N classification | |||||||||||||
| N0 | 195 (79.3) | 1.14±1.13 | 1.00 | 0.302 | 4.70±1.43 | 5.00 | 0.902 | 6.57±0.66 | 7.00 | 5.38±1.19 | 5.00 | 0.154 | |
| N1, N2 | 51 (20.7) | 1.33±1.31 | 1.00 | 4.73±1.55 | 5.00 | 6.80±0.49 | 7.00 | 5.65±1.07 | 6.00 | ||||
Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.
*p values were estimated by student’s T test.
†p values were estimated by Mann-Whitney U test.
‡ p values were estimated by 1-way ANOVA test.
p values were estimated by Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA test.
ap = 0.003;
bp = 0.021;
cp = 0.032;
dp = 0.026;
ep<0.001;
fp = 0.007;
gp = 0.024;
hp = 0.008.
The expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3), caspase-3 (C-3), caspase-8 (C-8) and caspase-9 (C-9) for disease-specific survival and disease-free survival of OTSCC patients.
| Variable | Disease-specific survival | Disease-free survival | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | CHR (95% CI) | AHR (95% CI) | CHR (95% CI) | AHR (95% CI) | ||||||
| CC-3 expression | Negative | 95 (38.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Positive | 151 (61.4) | 1.06 (0.72–1.56) | 0.765 | 1.04 (0.70–1.54) | 0.848 | 1.54 (1.00–2.40) | 0.053 | |||
| C-3 expression | Low | 88 (35.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High | 158 (64.2) | 0.86 (0.58–1.27) | 0.448 | 0.74 (0.49–1.10) | 0.134 | 1.06 (0.70–1.61) | 0.781 | 1.07 (0.70–1.63) | 0.760 | |
| C-8 expression | Low | 72 (29.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High | 174 (70.7) | 1.14 (0.76–1.72) | 0.532 | 0.98 (0.65–1.49) | 0.930 | 1.01 (0.65–1.56) | 0.963 | 0.94 (0.61–1.46) | 0.787 | |
| C-9 expression | Low | 119 (48.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High | 127 (51.6) | 1.01 (0.69–1.47) | 0.954 | 0.90 (0.61–1.33) | 0.593 | 1.19 (0.80–1.78) | 0.391 | 1.19 (0.79–1.79) | 0.418 | |
Abbreviations: CHR, crude hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; AHR, adjusted hazard ratio.
*p-value were adjusted for cell differentiation(moderate, poor vs. well), AJCC pathological stage (stage II, III, IV vs stage I), postoperative RT by multiple Cox‘ s regression.
†p-value were adjusted for cell differentiation(moderate, poor vs. well), AJCC pathological stage (stage II, III, IV vs stage I) by multiple Cox‘ s regression.
Fig 2The survival curves of OTSCC patients according to caspase expression.
(A) DSS and (B) DFS curves according to the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3), caspase-3 (C-3), caspase-8 (C-8), and caspase-9 (C-9) are shown. The cutoff criteria to split the high expression and low expression of each protein are described in the materials and methods.
Fig 3DFS curves of patients with OTSCC according to the pattern of cleaved caspase-3 expression for patients stratified according to the cell differentiation status.
Level of expression of cleaved caspase-3 in patients with (A, B and C) different cell differentiation or (D and E) lymph node invasion was evaluated for determination of DFS.
The co-expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 (CC-3) and caspase-3(C-3) for disease-specific survival and disease-free survival of OTSCC patients.
| Variable | No. (%) | Disease-specific survival | Disease-free survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHR (95% CI) | AHR (95% CI) | CHR (95% CI) | AHR (95% CI) | ||||||
| CC-3, C-3 expression | |||||||||
| Negative, Low | 30 (12.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Negative, High | 65 (26.4) | 0.91 (0.52–1.59) | 0.727 | 0.62 (0.35–1.10) | 0.104 | ||||
| Positve, Low | 58 (23.6) | ||||||||
| Positve, High | 93 (37.8) | ||||||||
Abbreviations: CHR, crude hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; AHR, adjusted hazard ratio.
*p-value were adjusted for cell differentiation(moderate, poor vs. well), AJCC pathological stage (stage II, III, IV vs stage I), postoperative RT by multiple Cox‘ s regression.
†p-value were adjusted for cell differentiation(moderate, poor vs. well), AJCC pathological stage (stage II, III, IV vs stage I) by multiple Cox‘ s regression.
Fig 4Survival curves of patients with OTSCC according to the combined expression pattern of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3.
Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze effect of the level of co-expression of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3 on DSS (A) and DFS (B).
Fig 5Stratified DSS curves of OTSCC patients according to the level of co-expression of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3.
Patterns of protein expression in patients stratified according to the AJCC pathological stage (A), T classification (B) and lymph node invasion (C) were used to analyze DSS.
Fig 6Stratified DFS curves of OTSCC patients according to the level of co-expression of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3.
Patterns of protein expression in patients with (A) well differentiated tumors, (B) moderately and (C) poorly differentiated tumors, (D) T1+T2 classification and (E) T3+T4 classification.