Literature DB >> 28699187

Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thusharika Dissanayaka1, Maryam Zoghi2, Michael Farrell3,4, Gary F Egan3, Shapour Jaberzadeh1.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have explored the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) - including anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS), cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS), transcranial alternative current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) - on corticospinal excitability (CSE) in healthy populations. However, the efficacy of these techniques and their optimal parameters for producing robust results has not been studied. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to consolidate current knowledge about the effects of various parameters of a-tDCS, c-tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS on the CSE of the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy people. Leading electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 1990 and February 2017; 126 articles were identified, and their results were extracted and analysed using RevMan software. The meta-analysis showed that a-tDCS application on the dominant side significantly increases CSE (P < 0.01) and that the efficacy of a-tDCS is dependent on current density and duration of application. Similar results were obtained for stimulation of M1 on the non-dominant side (P = 0.003). The effects of a-tDCS reduce significantly after 24 h (P = 0.006). Meta-analysis also revealed significant reduction in CSE following c-tDCS (P < 0.001) and significant increases after tRNS (P = 0.03) and tPCS (P = 0.01). However, tACS effects on CSE were only significant when the stimulation frequency was ≥140 Hz. This review provides evidence that tES has substantial effects on CSE in healthy individuals for a range of stimulus parameters.
© 2017 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS); transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699187     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  18 in total

1.  Increased leg muscle fatigability during 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over the left motor cortex.

Authors:  Craig D Workman; John Kamholz; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Effect of cognitive task complexity on dual task postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abubakar Tijjani Salihu; Keith D Hill; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Slow-oscillatory tACS does not modulate human motor cortical response to repeated plasticity paradigms.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Jessica Elliott; Samuel Dudley; Genevieve A Kieseker; Jason B Mattingley; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Influence of neurovascular mechanisms on response to tDCS: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Pooja C Iyer; Alexander Rosenberg; Tracy Baynard; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  What transcranial direct current stimulation intensity is best for cognitive enhancement?

Authors:  Jason Smucny
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation in community-dwelling elderly people: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yasuto Inukai; Mitsuhiro Masaki; Naofumi Otsuru; Kei Saito; Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes.

Authors:  Edgard Morya; Kátia Monte-Silva; Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli; Andre Fonseca; Tommaso Bocci; Faranak Farzan; Raaj Chatterjee; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado; André Russowsky Brunoni; Eva Mezger; Luciane Aparecida Moscaleski; Rodrigo Pegado; João Ricardo Sato; Marcelo Salvador Caetano; Kátia Nunes Sá; Clarice Tanaka; Li Min Li; Abrahão Fontes Baptista; Alexandre Hideki Okano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  The Tolerability and Efficacy of 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Muscle Fatigability.

Authors:  Craig D Workman; John Kamholz; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-23

10.  Differential Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Depending on Previous Musical Training.

Authors:  Ana Sánchez-Kuhn; Cristian Pérez-Fernández; Margarita Moreno; Pilar Flores; Fernando Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.