Literature DB >> 28699093

Evaluating Facility-Based Decision-Making in Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery and Association with Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes.

Adeline Adwoa Boatin1, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh2, Blair Johnson Wylie3, Samuel A Obed4.   

Abstract

Objective To describe facility-based decision-making for women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) in a resource-limited setting and to characterize maternal and perinatal outcomes in these groups. Methods One year retrospective study of women with one prior CD delivering at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana. Women were categorized into three groups based on initial plan of management on admission [trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), emergency repeat CD (EMCD) or non-emergent repeat CD (RCD)]. Characteristics and outcomes across these groups were then compared. Results During the study period, 1247 women with one prior CD delivered at KBTH, of which 377 (30.2%) were triaged to RCD, 439 (35.2%) to EMCD and 431 (34.6%) to TOLAC. Twelve uterine ruptures and no maternal deaths occurred. Perinatal mortality was 4.2% (n = 52). Compared to the RCD group, the TOLAC group had a lower risk for maternal adverse events (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0; p = 0.04) and non-significant higher risk of perinatal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.3; p = 0.25). Compared to women triaged to RCD, the EMCD group had a non-significant increase in risk of maternal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.5; p = 0.2) and a significantly higher rate of perinatal adverse events (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9; p = 0.01). Conclusions for Practice Women triaged to EMCD at admission are different when compared to women allowed a TOLAC or offered a non-emergent RCD. These women bear increased rates of adverse outcomes and should be considered as a separate group for analysis in future studies conducted in similar settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal care; Emergency repeat cesarean delivery; Intrapartum decision-making; Repeat cesarean delivery; Trial of labor after cesarean; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699093     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2302-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  18 in total

1.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour after previous caesarean section in sub-Saharan countries.

Authors:  C Kaboré; N Chaillet; S Kouanda; E Bujold; M Traoré; A Dumont
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Factors predicting outcome of trial of labor after prior cesarean section in a developing country].

Authors:  E O Adjahoto; D K Ekouevi; K A Hodonou
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2001-04

4.  Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancy in Kano, North-Western Nigeria.

Authors:  A Omole-Ohonsi; R A Attah
Journal:  West Afr J Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

5.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.

Authors:  M J McMahon; E R Luther; W A Bowes; A F Olshan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Perspectives on the practice of vaginal birth after caesarean section in East Africa.

Authors:  S Z Wanyonyi; A M Mukaindo; W Stones
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2010-08

7.  VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.

Authors:  J D Seffah; K Adu-Bonsaffoh
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

8.  Global distribution of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians.

Authors:  Hampus Holmer; Adam Lantz; Teena Kunjumen; Samuel Finlayson; Marguerite Hoyler; Amani Siyam; Hernan Montenegro; Edward T Kelley; James Campbell; Meena N Cherian; Lars Hagander
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 26.763

9.  Assessment of cesarean delivery availability in 26 low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rele Ologunde; Joshua P Vogel; Meena N Cherian; Mariam Sbaiti; Mario Merialdi; James Yeats
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes of delivery after a previous Cesarean section in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  George O Ugwu; Chukwuemeka A Iyoke; Hyacinth E Onah; Vincent E Egwuatu; Frank O Ezugwu
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-03-13
View more
  3 in total

1.  Characteristics of Women Receiving Emergency Caesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from Ghana and Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Ӧzge Tunçalp; Arachu Castro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-12-02

2.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Association between surgical technique, adhesions and morbidity in women with repeat caesarean section: a retrospective study in a rural hospital in Western Tanzania.

Authors:  R Mooij; I H Mwampagatwa; J van Dillen; J Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.