Literature DB >> 26374554

Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour after previous caesarean section in sub-Saharan countries.

C Kaboré1,2, N Chaillet3, S Kouanda2, E Bujold4, M Traoré5, A Dumont1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risks of uterine rupture, maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour (TOL) after one previous caesarean were compared with having an elective repeated caesarean section (ERCS) without labour in low-resource settings.
DESIGN: A prospective 4-year observational study.
SETTING: Senegal and Mali. SAMPLE: A cohort of 9712 women with one previous caesarean delivery.
METHODS: Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between 8083 women who underwent a TOL and 1629 women who had an ERCS. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were then stratified according to the presence or absence of risk factors associated with vaginal birth after caesarean section. These outcomes were adjusted on maternal, perinatal and institutional characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risks of uterine rupture, maternal complication and perinatal mortality associated with TOL after one previous caesarean as compared with ERCS,
RESULTS: The risks of hospital-based maternal complication [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P = 0.013] and perinatal mortality (adjusted OR 4.53; 95% CI 2.30-9.92; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in women with a TOL compared with women who had an ERCS. However, when restricted to low-risk women, these differences were not significant (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.55-1.46, P = 0.68, and adjusted OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.75-1.86; P = 0.53, for each outcome, respectively). Uterine rupture occurred in 25 (0.64%) of 3885 low-risk women compared with 70 (1.66%) of 4198 women with unfavourable risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Low-risk women have no increased risk of maternal complications or perinatal mortality compared with women with one or more unfavourable factors. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Low-risk women have a lower risk of maternal complications or perinatal mortality compared with high-risk women.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elective repeated caesarean section; perinatal and maternal outcomes low-resource setting; sub-Saharan Africa; trial of labour; vaginal birth after caesarean section

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374554     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating Facility-Based Decision-Making in Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery and Association with Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Adeline Adwoa Boatin; Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Blair Johnson Wylie; Samuel A Obed
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement.

Authors:  Adeline A Boatin; Joseph Ngonzi; Gabriel Ganyaglo; Magatte Mbaye; Blair J Wylie; Khady Diouf
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Management of prolonged first stage of labour in a low-resource setting: lessons learnt from rural Malawi.

Authors:  Wouter Bakker; Elisabeth van Dorp; Misheck Kazembe; Alfred Nkotola; Jos van Roosmalen; Thomas van den Akker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-08

5.  Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda.

Authors:  Richard Kalisa; Stephen Rulisa; Jos van Roosmalen; Thomas van den Akker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Socioeconomic differences in caesarean section - are they explained by medical need? An analysis of patient record data of a large Kenyan hospital.

Authors:  Lisa van der Spek; Sterre Sanglier; Hillary M Mabeya; Thomas van den Akker; Paul L J M Mertens; Tanja A J Houweling
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-07-08

7.  Prenatal care counseling and delivery method among women with multiple Cesareans: A cross-sectional study from Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Raha Maroyi; Nyakio Ngeleza; Laura Keyser; Katenga Bosunga; Denis Mukwege
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of Medical Doctors Global Health and Tropical Medicine on decision-making in caesarean section: a pre- and post-implementation study in a rural hospital in Malawi.

Authors:  Wouter Bakker; Emma Bakker; Christiaan Huigens; Emily Kaunda; Timothy Phiri; Jogchum Beltman; Jos van Roosmalen; Thomas van den Akker
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-11-09

9.  Safety and feasibility of trial of vaginal labor after cesarean section: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mingwei Zhang; Qin Su; Yan Cao; Minmin Zhao; Di Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Association between surgical technique, adhesions and morbidity in women with repeat caesarean section: a retrospective study in a rural hospital in Western Tanzania.

Authors:  R Mooij; I H Mwampagatwa; J van Dillen; J Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.