Literature DB >> 28698708

Pope John Paul II and the neurological standard for the determination of death: A critical analysis of his address to the Transplantation Society.

Doyen Nguyen1.   

Abstract

The introduction of the "brain death" criterion constitutes a significant paradigm shift in the determination of death. The perception of the public at large is that the Catholic Church has formally endorsed this neurological standard. However, a critical reading of the only magisterial document on this subject, Pope John Paul II's 2000 address, shows that the pope's acceptance of the neurological criterion is conditional in that it entails a twofold requirement. It requires that certain medical presuppositions of the neurological standard are fulfilled, and that its philosophical premise coheres with the Church's teaching on the body-soul union. This article demonstrates that the medical presuppositions are not fulfilled, and that the doctrine of the brain as the central somatic integrator of the body does not cohere either with the current holistic understanding of the human organism or with the Church's Thomistic doctrine of the soul as the form of the body.
SUMMARY: The concept of "brain death" (the neurological basis for legally declaring a person dead) has caused much controversy since its inception. In this regard, it has been generally perceived that the Catholic Church has officially affirmed the "brain death" criterion. The address of Pope John Paul II in 2000 shows, however, that he only gave it a conditional acceptance, one which requires that several medical and philosophical presuppositions of the "brain death" standard be fulfilled. This article demonstrates, taking into consideration both the empirical evidence and the Church's Thomistic anthropology, that the presuppositions have not been fulfilled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-entropic principle; Brain death; Hylomorphism; Papal allocutions; Principle of integration; Soul

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698708      PMCID: PMC5499224          DOI: 10.1080/00243639.2017.1307502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  55 in total

1.  Philosophical debates about the definition of death: who cares?

Authors:  S J Youngner; R M Arnold
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2001-10

2.  Evangelium Vitae.

Authors: 
Journal:  Origins       Date:  1995-04-06

3.  Brain death, the soul, and organic life.

Authors:  Edward J Furton
Journal:  Natl Cathol Bioeth Q       Date:  2002

4.  The dead donor rule and organ transplantation.

Authors:  Robert D Truog; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Of wholes and parts: A Thomistic refutation of "Brain Death".

Authors:  Michel Accad
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-08

6.  A defense of the whole-brain concept of death.

Authors:  J L Bernat
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 7.  A change of heart and a change of mind? Technology and the redefinition of death in 1968.

Authors:  M Giacomini
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Organ Preservation: Current Concepts and New Strategies for the Next Decade.

Authors:  Edgardo E Guibert; Alexander Y Petrenko; Cecilia L Balaban; Alexander Y Somov; Joaquín V Rodriguez; Barry J Fuller
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  The semantic confusion surrounding 'brain death'.

Authors:  D A Shewmon
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-06

10.  Electroencephalographic activity after brain death.

Authors:  M M Grigg; M A Kelly; G G Celesia; M W Ghobrial; E R Ross
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1987-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Conscientious objection by healthcare professionals to end-of-life organ donation practices: A response to Shaw et al.

Authors:  Joseph L Verheijde; Mohamed Y Rady
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-04-18

2.  Implications of John Kavanaugh's Philosophy of the Human Person as Embodied Reflexive Consciousness for Conscientious Decision-making in Brain Death.

Authors:  Joseph Eble
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-05-15

3.  Evolution of the Criteria of "Brain Death": A Critical Analysis Based on Scientific Realism and Christian Anthropology.

Authors:  Doyen Nguyen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-09-09

4.  Unpacking Robert Spaemann's Philosophical Contribution to the Brain Death Debate.

Authors:  Elinor Gardner
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-10-03

5.  Brain Death and the Formation of Moral Conscience.

Authors:  Christopher Ostertag; Kyle Karches
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-09-09

6.  Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?

Authors:  Doyen Nguyen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.