Literature DB >> 32431423

Evolution of the Criteria of "Brain Death": A Critical Analysis Based on Scientific Realism and Christian Anthropology.

Doyen Nguyen1.   

Abstract

"Brain death" (understood in the sense of "whole brain death" and not in the sense of "brainstem death") was introduced into clinical practice in 1968 when the Harvard Ad Hoc Committee defined irreversible coma as a new criterion for death (understood in the full sense of the word). According to the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), promulgated in 1981 by the President's Commission (which also formally advanced the first conceptual rationale for brain death), the legal declaration of death using the brain death standard requires the irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. The brain death standard has since evolved, however, to include significant modifications even though, on a literal reading, its clinical test criteria have remained unchanged. This article gives an account of why and how the brain death standard has been updated, leading to the currently practiced guidelines for the determination of brain death put forth by the American Academy of Neurology. According to the updated standard, the presence of certain brain or spinal cord functions does not invalidate the diagnosis of brain death. By analyzing these guidelines critically on the basis of scientific realism and Thomistic hylomorphism, this article demonstrates that the updated brain death standard contradicts both the UDDA and the tenets of sound anthropology held by the Catholic Church.
SUMMARY: This article examines the evolution of the "brain death" standard from the time of its introduction by the Harvard Committee until the current guidelines established by the American Academy of Neurology. This evolution consists mainly of a selective discarding of certain brain and spinal cord functions that are deemed insignificant. Based on the principles of scientific realism and a Thomistic substance view of human nature, this article shows that the evolved standard contradicts both the Uniform Determination of Death Act definition of brain death and the fundamental tenets of Christian anthropology as taught by the Catholic Church. © Catholic Medical Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Academy of Neurology guidelines; Aristotelian–Thomistic anthropology; Brain death; Catholic Church; Scientific realism

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431423      PMCID: PMC6880070          DOI: 10.1177/0024363919869474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  46 in total

Review 1.  Spinal shock and brain death': somatic pathophysiological equivalence and implications for the integrative-unity rationale.

Authors:  D A Shewmon
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Movements in brain death.

Authors:  G Saposnik; J Mauriño; J Bueri
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.089

3.  Spontaneous and reflex movements in brain death.

Authors:  G Saposnik; J A Bueri; J Mauriño; R Saizar; N S Garretto
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-01-11       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Total brain death: a reply to Alan Shewmon.

Authors:  Patrick Lee; Germain GriseZ
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Ethical problems created by the hopelessly unconscious patient.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death.

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  On the definition and criterion of death.

Authors:  J L Bernat; C M Culver; B Gert
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Unusual spontaneous movements in brain-dead patients.

Authors:  A H Ropper
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Cardiovascular and catecholamine response to surgery in brain-dead organ donors.

Authors:  R D Fitzgerald; I Dechtyar; E Templ; P Fridrich; F X Lackner
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  A philosophical assessment of TK's autopsy report: Implications for the debate over the brain death criteria.

Authors:  Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?

Authors:  Doyen Nguyen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-06-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.