Literature DB >> 28698155

In silico approach to safety of botanical dietary supplement ingredients utilizing constituent-level characterization.

Jason G Little1, Daniel S Marsman2, Timothy R Baker2, Catherine Mahony3.   

Abstract

Botanicals used in dietary supplements industry can have toxicology concerns related to endpoint gaps that cannot be fully resolved by a history of use, or existence of conflicting safety data. However, traditional toxicological studies on botanicals are scientifically and pragmatically challenging due to testing of complex mixtures of constituents, cost, time, and animal usage. Alternatively, we developed an in silico decision-tree approach to address data gaps and inform need for further studies by toxicologically evaluating the chemical composition of botanicals. Following advanced multi-detector analytical characterization of a botanical, each chemical constituent is: (a.) quantitatively benchmarked against similar constituents in commonly consumed foods or botanicals with well-established safety profiles, (b.) systematically evaluated for toxicity data utilizing structure-activity relationships, and, (c.) compared to established thresholds of toxicological concern in absence of safety data or structural analogs. Finally, where safety endpoint gaps are identified which cannot be resolved without additional in vitro or in vivo studies, the botanical compositional data are critical to inform on study design. Results with three herbal preparations demonstrate the utility of this novel approach to identify potential hazards and establish safe human use levels for botanicals in a cost efficient and informative manner that minimizes animal use.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Botanicals; Dietary supplements; Human safety assessment; In silico; Threshold of toxicological concern; UHPLC-HRMS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698155     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  5 in total

1.  Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Emilio Benfenati; Francesca Caloni; P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera; Christophe Chesné; Mark T D Cronin; Joop De Knecht; Daniel R Dietrich; Sylvia E Escher; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Brenna Flannery; Matthias Herzler; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Bruno Hubesch; Hennicke Kamp; Jaffar Kisitu; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Simona Kovarich; Marcel Leist; Alexandra Maertens; Kerry Nugent; Giorgia Pallocca; Manuel Pastor; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Octavio Presgrave; Lena Smirnova; Michael Schwarz; Takashi Yamada; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 2.  A Tiered Approach for the Evaluation of the Safety of Botanicals Used as Dietary Supplements: An Industry Strategy.

Authors:  Amy L Roe; Donna A McMillan; Catherine Mahony
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Multi-Detector Characterization of Grape Seed Extract to Enable in silico Safety Assessment.

Authors:  Vincent P Sica; Catherine Mahony; Timothy R Baker
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 4.  Chemometric-Guided Approaches for Profiling and Authenticating Botanical Materials.

Authors:  Evelyn J Abraham; Joshua J Kellogg
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-11-26

5.  A multi-detector chromatographic approach for characterization and quantitation of botanical constituents to enable in silico safety assessments.

Authors:  Timothy R Baker; Brian T Regg
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.142

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.