Literature DB >> 28696295

Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines.

Gerardo Ceballos1, Paul R Ehrlich2, Rodolfo Dirzo3.   

Abstract

The population extinction pulse we describe here shows, from a quantitative viewpoint, that Earth's sixth mass extinction is more severe than perceived when looking exclusively at species extinctions. Therefore, humanity needs to address anthropogenic population extirpation and decimation immediately. That conclusion is based on analyses of the numbers and degrees of range contraction (indicative of population shrinkage and/or population extinctions according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature) using a sample of 27,600 vertebrate species, and on a more detailed analysis documenting the population extinctions between 1900 and 2015 in 177 mammal species. We find that the rate of population loss in terrestrial vertebrates is extremely high-even in "species of low concern." In our sample, comprising nearly half of known vertebrate species, 32% (8,851/27,600) are decreasing; that is, they have decreased in population size and range. In the 177 mammals for which we have detailed data, all have lost 30% or more of their geographic ranges and more than 40% of the species have experienced severe population declines (>80% range shrinkage). Our data indicate that beyond global species extinctions Earth is experiencing a huge episode of population declines and extirpations, which will have negative cascading consequences on ecosystem functioning and services vital to sustaining civilization. We describe this as a "biological annihilation" to highlight the current magnitude of Earth's ongoing sixth major extinction event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservation; ecosystem service; population declines; population extinctions; sixth mass extinction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28696295      PMCID: PMC5544311          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704949114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

Review 1.  Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota.

Authors:  David A Wardle; Richard D Bardgett; John N Klironomos; Heikki Setälä; Wim H van der Putten; Diana H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change.

Authors:  David U Hooper; E Carol Adair; Bradley J Cardinale; Jarrett E K Byrnes; Bruce A Hungate; Kristin L Matulich; Andrew Gonzalez; J Emmett Duffy; Lars Gamfeldt; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

Authors:  William J Ripple; James A Estes; Robert L Beschta; Christopher C Wilmers; Euan G Ritchie; Mark Hebblewhite; Joel Berger; Bodil Elmhagen; Mike Letnic; Michael P Nelson; Oswald J Schmitz; Douglas W Smith; Arian D Wallach; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function.

Authors:  Laura A Burkle; John C Marlin; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection.

Authors:  S L Pimm; C N Jenkins; R Abell; T M Brooks; J L Gittleman; L N Joppa; P H Raven; C M Roberts; J O Sexton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Global mammal conservation: what must we manage?

Authors:  Gerardo Ceballos; Paul R Ehrlich; Jorge Soberón; Irma Salazar; John P Fay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Malin L Pinsky; Stephen R Palumbi; James A Estes; Francis H Joyce; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Experimental defaunation of terrestrial mammalian herbivores alters tropical rainforest understorey diversity.

Authors:  Angela A Camargo-Sanabria; Eduardo Mendoza; Roger Guevara; Miguel Martínez-Ramos; Rodolfo Dirzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; J Emmett Duffy; Andrew Gonzalez; David U Hooper; Charles Perrings; Patrick Venail; Anita Narwani; Georgina M Mace; David Tilman; David A Wardle; Ann P Kinzig; Gretchen C Daily; Michel Loreau; James B Grace; Anne Larigauderie; Diane S Srivastava; Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  189 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science.

Authors:  Kristian Steensen Nielsen; Theresa M Marteau; Jan M Bauer; Richard B Bradbury; Steven Broad; Gayle Burgess; Mark Burgman; Hilary Byerly; Susan Clayton; Dulce Espelosin; Paul J Ferraro; Brendan Fisher; Emma E Garnett; Julia P G Jones; Mark Otieno; Stephen Polasky; Taylor H Ricketts; Rosie Trevelyan; Sander van der Linden; Diogo Veríssimo; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Johanna Ärje; Kim Bjerge; Oskar L P Hansen; Alexandros Iosifidis; Florian Leese; Hjalte M R Mann; Kristian Meissner; Claus Melvad; Jenni Raitoharju
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Eliza M Grames; Matthew L Forister; May R Berenbaum; David Stopak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Conserving intraspecific variation for nature's contributions to people.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; Linwood H Pendleton; Beth Shapiro; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Effects of management outweigh effects of plant diversity on restored animal communities in tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Peter W Guiden; Nicholas A Barber; Ryan Blackburn; Anna Farrell; Jessica Fliginger; Sheryl C Hosler; Richard B King; Melissa Nelson; Erin G Rowland; Kirstie Savage; John P Vanek; Holly P Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extinction tsunami can be avoided.

Authors:  Thomas E Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Extinction risk in extant marine species integrating palaeontological and biodistributional data.

Authors:  K S Collins; S M Edie; G Hunt; K Roy; D Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Decline of parasitic and habitat-specialist species drives taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional homogenization of sub-alpine bumblebee communities.

Authors:  Yoan Fourcade; Sandra Åström; Erik Öckinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Reintroductions of birds and mammals involve evolutionarily distinct species at the regional scale.

Authors:  Charles Thévenin; Maud Mouchet; Alexandre Robert; Christian Kerbiriou; François Sarrazin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Hanson; Jonathan R Rhodes; Cynthia Riginos; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.