Literature DB >> 28696160

Guidelines on severity assessment and classification of genetically altered mouse and rat lines.

Anne Zintzsch1,2, Elena Noe1,3, Monika Reißmann1,4, Kristina Ullmann1,3, Stephanie Krämer1,2,5, Boris Jerchow1,6, Reinhart Kluge1,5, Claudia Gösele1,2, Hannah Nickles1,3, Astrid Puppe1,7, Thomas Rülicke8.   

Abstract

Genetic alterations can unpredictably compromise the wellbeing of animals. Thus, more or less harmful phenotypes might appear in the animals used in research projects even when they are not subjected to experimental treatments. The severity classification of suffering has become an important issue since the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Accordingly, the breeding and maintenance of genetically altered (GA) animals which are likely to develop a harmful phenotype has to be authorized. However, a determination of the degree of severity is rather challenging due to the large variety of phenotypes. Here, the Working Group of Berlin Animal Welfare Officers (WG Berlin AWO) provides field-tested guidelines on severity assessment and classification of GA rodents. With a focus on basic welfare assessment and severity classification we provide a list of symptoms that have been classified as non-harmful, mild, moderate or severe burdens. Corresponding monitoring and refinement strategies as well as specific housing requirements have been compiled and are strongly recommended to improve hitherto applied breeding procedures and conditions. The document serves as a guide to determine the degree of severity for an observed phenotype. The aim is to support scientists, animal care takers, animal welfare bodies and competent authorities with this task, and thereby make an important contribution to a European harmonization of severity assessments for the continually increasing number of GA rodents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; genetically altered animals; harmful phenotype; severity assessment; severity classification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28696160     DOI: 10.1177/0023677217718863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  6 in total

1.  Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  3R measures in facilities for the production of genetically modified rodents.

Authors:  Branko Zevnik; Boris Jerchow; Thorsten Buch
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 9.667

3.  Navigating Uncertainties: How to Assess Welfare and Harm in Genetically Altered Animals Responsibly-A Practical Guideline.

Authors:  Anne Zintzsch; Elena Noe; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The "WWHow" Concept for Prospective Categorization of Post-operative Severity Assessment in Mice and Rats.

Authors:  Anke Tappe-Theodor; Claudia Pitzer; Lars Lewejohann; Paulin Jirkof; Katja Siegeler; Astra Segelcke; Natascha Drude; Bruno Pradier; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Britta Hollinderbäumer; Daniel Segelcke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl4 injections.

Authors:  André Bleich; René H Tolba; Steven R Talbot; Lisa Ernst; Stefan Bruch; Marcin Kopaczka; Dorit Merhof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Design of composite measure schemes for comparative severity assessment in animal-based neuroscience research: A case study focussed on rat epilepsy models.

Authors:  Roelof Maarten van Dijk; Ines Koska; Andre Bleich; Rene Tolba; Isabel Seiffert; Christina Möller; Valentina Di Liberto; Steven Roger Talbot; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.