Karen Jong1, Shreeya Popat1, Alana Christie1, Philippe E Zimmern2. 1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA. 2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA. philippe.zimmern@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was to review our experience of pain relief durability in women who experienced initial pain resolution after vaginal mesh and/or sling removal (VMSR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive, nonneurogenic women who underwent VMSR for pain and reported persistent pain relief at the 6-month postoperative follow-up visit were assessed. Pre- and postoperative data collected were self-reported chief complaints, physical examination, other medical conditions associated with chronic pain, use of pain medications, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (in which question 6 specifically addresses pain), and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Success was defined by continued resolution of pain assessed by score of 0 on NPRS (0 none to 10 terrible), (0-1 on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) question 6, subjective report of pain-free status, and/or no chronic use of pain medications other than those prescribed for non-mesh-related pain. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2015, 125 of 356 women met study criteria. Mean follow-up after VMSR was 3.5 (range 0.5-10) years. Among 25 women who did not meet success criteria by questionnaire answers or subjective report, 21 had causes unrelated to their original mesh/sling placement and were pain free after they were addressed. Four women experienced delayed mesh-related pain return at 28, 46, 47, and 54 months, respectively; two required mesh removal surgery. Involvement in lawsuits and chronic pain-related medical conditions did not affect the durability of pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: At a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the original pain relief noted after VMSR was durably maintained.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was to review our experience of pain relief durability in women who experienced initial pain resolution after vaginal mesh and/or sling removal (VMSR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive, nonneurogenic women who underwent VMSR for pain and reported persistent pain relief at the 6-month postoperative follow-up visit were assessed. Pre- and postoperative data collected were self-reported chief complaints, physical examination, other medical conditions associated with chronic pain, use of pain medications, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (in which question 6 specifically addresses pain), and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Success was defined by continued resolution of pain assessed by score of 0 on NPRS (0 none to 10 terrible), (0-1 on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) question 6, subjective report of pain-free status, and/or no chronic use of pain medications other than those prescribed for non-mesh-related pain. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2015, 125 of 356 women met study criteria. Mean follow-up after VMSR was 3.5 (range 0.5-10) years. Among 25 women who did not meet success criteria by questionnaire answers or subjective report, 21 had causes unrelated to their original mesh/sling placement and were pain free after they were addressed. Four women experienced delayed mesh-related pain return at 28, 46, 47, and 54 months, respectively; two required mesh removal surgery. Involvement in lawsuits and chronic pain-related medical conditions did not affect the durability of pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: At a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the original pain relief noted after VMSR was durably maintained.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mesh removal; Pelvic pain; Synthetic mesh; Vaginal surgery
Authors: Loïc Boulanger; Malik Boukerrou; Chrystèle Rubod; Pierre Collinet; A Fruchard; René J Courcol; Michel Cosson Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2008-06
Authors: Erin C Crosby; Melinda Abernethy; Mitchell B Berger; John O DeLancey; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jill M Danford; David J Osborn; W Stuart Reynolds; Daniel H Biller; Roger R Dmochowski Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lisa Rogo-Gupta; Tamara Grisales; Linda Huynh; Larissa V Rodríguez; Shlomo Raz Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Elliot K Blau; Sarah A Adelstein; Katherine A Amin; Sharon J Durfy; Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi; Una J Lee Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2019-11-15