| Literature DB >> 28694508 |
Mari-Carmen Pineda1,2, Brian Strehlow3,4,5, Miriam Sternel6, Alan Duckworth3,4, Ross Jones3,4, Nicole S Webster3,4.
Abstract
Dredging can cause high suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) in the water column, posing a hazard to filter feeding organisms like sponges as sediment may clog their aquiferous systems and reduce feeding. In order to provide pressure-response values for sponges to SSC and tease apart the cause:effect pathways of dredging pressures, five heterotrophic and phototrophic species were experimentally exposed to a range of dredging-relevant SSC of up to 100 mg L-1, with light compensation across treatments to ensure that SSC was the primary physical parameter. This study shows that some sponge species exposed to high SSC (≥23 mg L-1) for extended periods (28 d) have lower survival, increased necrosis and depletion of energy reserves. In contrast, SSC of ≤10 mg L-1 caused few, if any, negative effects and is thus suggested as a prudent sub-lethal threshold for sponges. Microbial communities did not change significantly among SSC treatments, although a nutritional shift from mixotrophy towards increased phototrophy was detected for some sponge species exposed to high SSC. Importantly however, it is expected that the combined effect of SSC with low light availability and sediment smothering as occurs during dredging operations will increase the negative effects on sponges.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28694508 PMCID: PMC5504051 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05241-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SSC during the experiment. (a) Means ( ± SE) SSCs (mg L−1) at each treatment, according to gravimetric measures.
Figure 2Physiological responses of sponges to elevated SSCs. (a) Percentage of growth (mean ± SE) (based on sponge tissue thickness), (b) Percentage of necrotic or bleached tissue, (c) Percentage of sponge biomass comprised of lipids, and (d) Mean respiration rates (µmol O2 L−1 h−1 cm−3 sponge), for all species and SSCs (0, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg L−1) after the 28 d experimental period (E), and 14 d observational period (O) (mean ± SE). Asterisks show statistically significant differences between the experimental and observational phase in a–c and between treatments in d (t-tests: P < 0.05).
ANOVA tables and summaries of linear mixed models testing the effects of different SSCs on the physiological responses of sponges.
| Source |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| (A) Relative growth rate (thickness) | |||||||||||
| Experimental phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 3.337 | 0.109 | 1.47 | 0.337 | 5.81 | 0.04 | 0.767 | 0.589 | 1.752 | 0.275 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||||||
| Tukey | 0,3,10,30 > 100 | ||||||||||
| Observational phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 2.761 | 0.148 | 4.319 | 0.07 | 3.94 | 0.08 | 1.887 | 0.251 | 0.251 | 0.898 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||||||
| (B) Percentage of necrosis and bleaching | |||||||||||
| Experimental phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 9.12 | <0.0001 | 0.8 | 0.574 | 7.25 | 0.02 | 7.07 | 0.02 | 3.64 | 0.09 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||||||
| Tukey | 0,3,10,30 < 100 | 0,3,10,30 < 100 | 0 < 3,10,30,100 | ||||||||
| Observational phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 9.80 | 0.01 | 0.8 | 0.573 | 1.598 | 0.306 | 12.9 | <0.0001 | 3.14 | 0.12 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||||||
| Tukey | 0,3,10,30 < 100 | 0,3 < 10,100 | |||||||||
| (C) Percentage of sponge biomass comprised of lipids | |||||||||||
| Experimental phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 2 | 0.612 | 0.598 | 0.733 | 0.550 | 10.95 | 0.04 | 4.837 | 0.115 | 3.783 | 0.151 |
| Error | 12 | ||||||||||
| Tukey | 0,100 > 30 | ||||||||||
| Observational phase | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 2 | 5.255 | 0.105 | 2.220 | 0.256 | 7.212 | 0.071 | 1.951 | 0.287 | 0.998 | 0.465 |
| Error | 12 | ||||||||||
| (D) Respiration Rates | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 6.920 | 0.0285 | 1.832 | 0.2605 | 2.076 | 0.2218 | 1.344 | 0.3701 | 0.7203 | 0.613 |
| Time | 2 | 17.177 | <0.001 | 63.407 | <0.001 | 16.51 | <0.001 | 1.477 | 0.2406 | 38.153 | <0.001 |
| Treatm. x Time | 8 | 0.6266 | 0.7494 | 3.581 | 0.00323 | 8.490 | <0.001 | 4.118 | 0.0012 | 3.165 | 0.007 |
| Error | 40 | ||||||||||
| Tukey | |||||||||||
| Treatment | 0 > 10,30 | ||||||||||
| Time | T0 > E; T0 > O | T0 > E < O | |||||||||
| Treatm. within E | 0 > 3,10,30,100 | ||||||||||
| Time within 0 | T0 > E,O | T0 < E > O | T0 < O | ||||||||
| Time within 3 | T0 > O > E | T0 > E,O | T0 > E < O | ||||||||
| Time within 10 | T0 > E,O | T0 > E,O | T0 > O | T0 > E,O | |||||||
| Time within 30 | T0 > E,O | T0 > E, O | T0 > E,O | ||||||||
| Time within 100 | T0 > E < O | T0 > E,O | T0 < E | T0 > E,O | |||||||
(A) Growth rate based on thickness measures, (B) Percentage of necrotic and bleached tissue, (C) Percentage of sponge biomass comprised of lipids, (D) Mean respiration rates, for each species separately, at the end of experimental phase (E) and observational phase (O). Tukey tests were performed for significant pairwise multiple comparisons. (SSC: 0, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg L−1).
ANOVA tables and summaries of linear mixed models on the effects of elevated SSCs on photosymbionts.
| Source |
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| (A) Maximum quantum yield | |||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 1.238 | 0.4016 | 0.380 | 0.8154 | 2.912 | 0.1356 |
| Time | 6 | 3.410 | 0.0040 | 2.949 | 0.0101 | 2.523 | 0.0247 |
| Treatm. × Time | 18 | 1.468 | 0.0646 | 1.451 | 0.0985 | 2.582 | <0.001 |
| Error | 96 | ||||||
| Tukey | |||||||
| Time | Day 0 ≠ Day 14; O7 ≠ Day 7 | ||||||
| Time within 10 mg L-1 | Day 0 ≠ Day 21 | ||||||
| Time within 100 mg L-1 | Day 7 ≠ Day 0, 21, 28 | ||||||
| Treatment within Day 21(E) | 0, 10 ≠ 100 | ||||||
| Treatment within Day 14(O) | 0 ≠ 100 | ||||||
| (B) Chl a | |||||||
| Experimental phase | |||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 5.400 | 0.0464 | 0.8582 | 0.5462 | 2.473 | 0.1738 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||
| Tukey | 3, 10 > 100 | ||||||
| Observational phase | |||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 2.225 | 0.2018 | 2.238 | 0.2002 | 0.5241 | 0.7245 |
| Error | 20 | ||||||
| (C) PERMANOVA of all pigment data | |||||||
| Treatment | 4 | 4.738 | 0.001 | 1.698 | 0.078 | 2.383 | 0.021 |
| Time(Treatment) | 5 | 2.235 | 0.019 | 1.305 | 0.207 | 1.789 | 0.082 |
| Error | 40 | ||||||
| Pair-wise Tests | 0 ≠ 3, 10, 30 ≠ 100 | 3 ≠ 10, 30, 100 | |||||
(A) Effects of treatment and time on maximum quantum yield throughout the experiment (B) Effects of treatment on Chl a concentrations at the end of the experimental (E) and observational (O) periods, and (C) Two-way PERMANOVA of all pigment data (Chl a, b, c, d, Total Chlorophyll and Carotenoids) with SSC and Time as factors, for the three phototrophic species (SSC: 0, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg L−1). In a-c, Tukey tests were performed for significant pairwise multiple comparisons.
Figure 3Response of the photosymbionts to elevated SSCs. (a) Mean values ( ± SE) of maximum quantum yield, (b) Mean values (±SE) of Chl a, and (c) Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (nMDS) of all photopigments retrieved by spectrophotometry, for the three phototrophic species and for all SSCs through the experimental phase and observational phase. Asterisks show statistically significant differences between the experimental and observational phase on b (t-tests: P < 0.05).
PERMANOVA analyses of the sponge-associated microbiome with (A) species and time as factors, (B) source as factor (sponge host vs. seawater) and, (C) SSC and time (nested to SSC) as fixed factors for all five sponge species.
| Source |
| MS | Pseudo- |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) | ||||
| Species | 4 | 73421 | 34.606 | 0.0001 |
| Time | 3 | 4680 | 2.2062 | 0.0001 |
| Species × Time | 1 | 3344 | 1.5765 | 0.0001 |
| Residuals | 1 | 2121 | ||
| Pair-wise Tests | ||||
| CAR:F ≠ E( | ||||
| B) | ||||
| Source | 1 | 26923 | 6.3132 | 0.0001 |
| Residuals | 1 | 4269 | ||
| C) | ||||
|
| ||||
| SS | 2 | 3447 | 1.54 | 0.1604 |
| Time (SS) | 3 | 2239 | 1.0156 | 0.3855 |
| Residuals | 2 | 2204 | ||
|
| ||||
| SS | 2 | 1474 | 1.0237 | 0.4304 |
| Time (SS) | 2 | 1427 | 1.1049 | 0.199 |
| Residuals | 1 | 1291 | ||
|
| ||||
| SS | 2 | 4458 | 1.0368 | 0.3809 |
| Time (SS) | 3 | 4302 | 1.7738 | 0.0001 |
| Residuals | 2 | 2425 | ||
|
| ||||
| SS | 2 | 3362 | 1.2413 | 0.0682 |
| Time (SS) | 3 | 2709 | 1.0787 | 0.1323 |
| Residuals | 2 | 2511 | ||
|
| ||||
| SS | 2 | 1984 | 1.1119 | 0.2005 |
| Time (SS) | 3 | 1784 | 1.0984 | 0.1205 |
| Residuals | 2 | 1624 | ||
In pair-wise tests, F: field control, T0: time 0 control, E: sampling after the 28 d experimental period, O: sampling after the 14 d observational period; CAR for Carteriospongia foliascens, CYM for Cymbastela coralliophila, CLI for Cliona orientalis, COS for Coscinoderma matthewsi and STY for Stylissa flabelliformis; 0, 30 and 100 mg L−1 within SSC.
Figure 4Microbial responses to SSCs. (a) Principal coordinate analysis plots for all species and treatments after the 28 d experimental period (E) and 14 d observational period (O), (b) Average relative abundance of each bacteria phylum (and class for Proteobacteria) using OTUs representing greater than 1% of the community for each treatment across both sampling times, (c) Cytoscape networks of the microbiome community in all species at 0 and 100 mg L−1 of SSC across both sampling times. Circles correspond to different OTUs (with OTU numbers) and colours relate to their phylum or class level in the case of Proteobacteria.