| Literature DB >> 28693145 |
Dong Wang1, Jia-Fu Feng2, Guang-Ya Yuan3, Yong-Hong Yang4, Yun-Shuang Liu2, Yu-Wei Yang2.
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to investigate the chromosomal aberrations of exfoliated bladder cells in the urine and blood oxidative stress in patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma (BTCC). A total of 40 healthy controls and 246 patients with BTCC were recruited. Abnormal levels of CSP3, CSP7, CSP17 and GLPp16 were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in exfoliated bladder cells in the urine of patients with BTCC. Serum total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS) and oxidative stress index (OSI) were measured. Significant differences were observed in the abnormal CSP3, CSP7, CSP17, GLPp16 signals and FISH positive rate between patients with BTCC and healthy controls (P<0.001). Serum TOS, TAS and OSI were also significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001). The clinical stage of BTCC was not associated with abnormal CSP3, CSP7, CSP17, GLPp16 or FISH positive rate and oxidative stress (P>0.05). A Gamma rank correlation analysis revealed an association between the pathological grade of BTCC with abnormal CSP3, CSP7 and CSP17 as well as FISH positive rate (P<0.001). In addition, the clinical stage of BTCC was associated with serum TOS, TAS and OSI (P<0.001). Evaluation of the association between chromosomal aberrations and oxidative stress revealed that abnormal CSP3, CSP7 and CSP17 were positively associated with serum TOS and OSI (P<0.001), abnormal CSP7 and CSP17 were negatively associated with serum TAS (P<0.001), but abnormal GLPp16 was not associated with serum TOS, TAS or OSI (P>0.05). Therefore, the chromosomal aberrations of exfoliated bladder cells in the urine are associated with blood oxidative stress in patients with BTCC, and these factors may contribute to the occurrence and development of BTCC.Entities:
Keywords: BTCC; FISH; OxS; diagnosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28693145 PMCID: PMC5494805 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Optimal cut-off values for fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive voided urine specimens (n=30).
| Probe | 0 signal (%) | 1 signal (%) | ≥3 signals (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSP3 | – | 0.37±0.72, 2.53 | 1.07±1.82, 6.53 |
| CSP7 | – | 0.40±0.81, 2.83 | 1.10±1.39, 5.27 |
| GLPp16 | 1.27±1.11, 4.60 | 1.03±1.61, 5.86 | 0.73±0.83, 3.22 |
| CSP17 | – | 0.67±0.92, 3.43 | 1.60±1.52, 6.16 |
Data were presented as the mean ± SD and the cut-off value, and this cut-off value is equal to mean + 3SD. SD, standard deviation.
FISH of exfoliated bladder cells, and oxidative stress of patients with BTCC and healthy controls.
| Parameter | BTCC group | Control group | χ2 or t-test value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total, n | 246 | 40 | ||
| CSP3, n (%) | 124 (50.4) | 4 (10.0) | 21.115[ | <0.001 |
| CSP7, n (%) | 131 (53.3) | 5 (12.5) | 21.305[ | <0.001 |
| CSP17, n (%) | 110 (44.7) | 3 (7.5) | 18.411[ | <0.001 |
| GLPp16, n (%) | 148 (60.2) | 7 (17.5) | 23.537[ | <0.001 |
| FISH, n (%) | 134 (54.5) | 0 (0.0) | 38.839[ | <0.001 |
| Total oxidant status, µmol H2O2 Eq./l | 18.56±3.72 | 14.64±1.29 | 6.604[ | <0.001 |
| Total antioxidant status, mmol Trolox Eq./l | 1.44±0.23 | 1.65±0.17 | −5.623[ | <0.001 |
| Oxidative stress index | 1.35±0.43 | 0.89±0.11 | 6.669[ | <0.001 |
χ2 test.
t-test. BTCC, bladder transitional cell carcinoma; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Figure 1.Representative fluorescence in situ hybridization image of exfoliated bladder cells from patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma (magnification, ×1000). (A) CSP3 (red), CSP7 (green), CSP3 or CSP7 triploidy/tetraploidy was observed in this patient. (B) CSP17 (green), GLPp16 (red), CSP17 diploidy/triploidy/tetraploidy and GLPp16 haploid deletion were observed in this patient.
Hybridization signals in exfoliated bladder cells of 246 patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma.
| Probe | Mixed missing (0 or 1 signal) | Haploid (1 signal) | Polyploid (>3 signals) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSP3, n (%) | 6 (2.4) | 12 (4.9) | 106 (43.1) | 124 (50.4) |
| CSP7, n (%) | 12 (4.9) | 15 (6.1) | 104 (42.3) | 131 (53.3) |
| CSP17, n (%) | 10 (4.1) | 25 (10.2) | 75 (30.5) | 110 (44.7) |
| GLPp16, n (%) | 27 (11.0) | 110 (44.7) | 11 (4.5) | 148 (60.2) |
Figure 2.Diagnostic performance of serum oxidative stress parameters for bladder transitional cell carcinoma. No significant difference was identified between AUCTOS and AUCTAS (z=1.067, P=0.286), but significant differences were observed between AUCOSI and AUCTOS (z=2.671, P=0.008) or between AUCOSI and AUCTAS (z=3.566, P<0.001). TOS, total oxidant status; TAS, total antioxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; AUC, area under curve.
Correlation between chromosomal aberrations and oxidative stress parameters in patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma.
| Clinical stage | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A, Group | Ta | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | R-value | P-value |
| Total, n | 24 | 75 | 74 | 48 | 25 | ||
| CSP3[ | 8 (33.3) | 39 (52.0) | 33 (44.6) | 34 (70.8) | 10 (40.0) | 0.131 | 0.155 |
| CSP7[ | 9 (37.5) | 41 (54.7) | 36 (48.6) | 34 (70.8) | 11 (44.0) | 0.118 | 0.207 |
| CSP17[ | 5 (20.8) | 31 (41.3) | 43 (58.1) | 20 (41.7) | 11 (44.0) | 0.138 | 0.133 |
| GLPp16[ | 9 (37.5) | 49 (65.3) | 50 (67.6) | 33 (68.8) | 7 (28.0) | −0.026 | 0.792 |
| FISH[ | 6 (25.0) | 49 (65.3) | 44 (59.5) | 23 (47.9) | 12 (48.0) | −0.014 | 0.885 |
| TOS[ | 16.68±3.28 | 18.98±3.96 | 18.56±3.32 | 17.52±3.94 | 20.61±3.02 | 0.087 | 0.175 |
| TAS[ | 1.45±0.26 | 1.45±0.23 | 1.42±0.21 | 1.49±0.18 | 1.34±0.32 | −0.043 | 0.502 |
| OSI[ | 1.22±0.49 | 1.36±0.42 | 1.34±0.36 | 1.19±0.32 | 1.66±0.57 | 0.093 | 0.146 |
| Patdological grade | |||||||
| B, Group | G0 | G1 | G2A | G2B | G3 | R-value | P-value |
| Total, n | 35 | 57 | 72 | 52 | 30 | ||
| CSP3[ | 4 (11.4) | 27 (47.4) | 33 (45.8) | 36 (69.2) | 24 (80.0) | 0.515 | <0.001 |
| CSP7[ | 8 (22.9) | 16 (28.1) | 41 (56.9) | 39 (75.0) | 27 (90.0) | 0.639 | <0.001 |
| CSP17[ | 8 (22.9) | 12 (21.1) | 32 (44.4) | 32 (61.5) | 26 (86.7) | 0.584 | <0.001 |
| GLPp16[ | 19 (54.3) | 37 (64.9) | 37 (51.4) | 38 (73.1) | 17 (56.7) | 0.063 | 0.497 |
| FISH[ | 10 (28.6) | 28 (49.1) | 38 (52.8) | 31 (59.6) | 27 (90.0) | 0.413 | <0.001 |
| TOS[ | 14.58±1.33 | 16.16±2.47 | 19.35±3.15 | 20.79±3.34 | 22.00±2.42 | 0.671 | <0.001 |
| TAS[ | 1.52±0.23 | 1.54±0.19 | 1.43±0.19 | 1.37±0.24 | 1.27±0.28 | −0.326 | <0.001 |
| OSI[ | 0.98±0.17 | 1.07±0.24 | 1.38±0.29 | 1.55±0.36 | 1.84±0.54 | 0.66 | <0.001 |
Gamma rank correlation analysis
Spearman's rank correlation analysis. FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; TOS, total oxidant status; TAS, total antioxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index.
Spearman's rank correlation analysis of fluorescent in situ hybridization data and serum oxidative stress parameters.
| Parameter | CSP3 | CSP7 | CSP17 | GLPp16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total oxidant status | 0.248, <0.001 | 0.351, <0.001 | 0.304, <0.001 | 0.047, 0.461 |
| Total antioxidant status | −0.122, 0.057 | −0.297, <0.001 | −0.182, <0.001 | −0.015, 0.821 |
| Oxidative stress index | 0.237, <0.001 | 0.435, <0.001 | 0.317, <0.001 | 0.018, 0.781 |
Data were presented as R-value, P-value.