| Literature DB >> 28692943 |
Sabyasachi Das1, Satyajit Tripathy1, Sourav Chattopadhayay1, Balaram Das1, Santanu Kar Mahapatra2, Amiya Kumar Hati3, Somenath Roy4.
Abstract
Chloroquine (CQ) is highly effective against P. vivax, due to the rapid spread of CQ resistance in P. falciparum parasites; it is no longer the drug of choice against P. falciparum. This study elucidates the scenario of chloroquine efficacy at times that coincided with a new drug policy and especially assessed the chloroquine resistant molecular markers after withdrawal of chloroquine in Kolkata and Purulia, two malaria endemic zones of West Bengal, India. In vitro CQ susceptibility was tested in 781 patients with P. falciparum mono infections between 2008 and 2013, of which 338 patients had received CQ in 2008-2009. Genotyping of the pfcrt and the pfmdr1 gene was carried out in all isolates. Early treatment failure was detected in 114 patients {43 (31·39%) from Kolkata and 71 (35·32%) from Purulia} while recrudescence was identified in 13 (9.49%) and 17 (8.46%) patients from Kolkata and Purulia respectively. In vivo chloroquine resistance was strongly associated with CVMNT-YYSNY (p < 0.01) and SVMNT-YYSNY (p < 0.05) allele in Kolkata. In Purulia chloroquine resistance was associated with CVMNK-YYSNY (P < 0.005), SVMNT-YYSNY (P < 0.01) allele. The proportion of in vitro chloroquine resistance increased in subsequent years to 87.23% and 93·10% in 2013, in Kolkata and Purulia, respectively. Isolates with SVMNT-YFSND, SVMNT-YFSNY, CVIET-YFSND and CVIET-YYSNY haplotypes increased gradually (p < 0.05) from 2010 to 2013, leading to a rise in IC50 (p < 0.05) of chloroquine. An increase in in vitro chloroquine resistance and candidate gene mutations even after five years of chloroquine withdrawal against P. falciparum calls for synchronized research surveillance and proper containment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: ChloroQuine resistance in India; In vitro chloroquine resistance; Plasmodium falciparum; pfcrt polymorphism; pfmdr1 mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28692943 PMCID: PMC5503838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ISSN: 2211-3207 Impact factor: 4.077
Fig. 1Geographical map of the study sites. Kolkata and Purulia are shown as asterisks.
Fig. 2Schematic presentation of patients' selection during the study period.
Patient characteristics at enrolment of the study in different study area.
| Patient Characteristics | Kolkata | Purulia |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 28.76 (95%CI, 3–72) | 26.31(95%CI, 3–73) |
| Sex ratio (Women/Men) | 177/168 | 191/245 |
| Axillary Temperature on day 0 (°C) | 39.38 °C (95%CI, 37.71–40.67) | 38.44 °C (95%CI, 37.33–39.89) |
| Parasitaemia (parasite/μl) | 86188 (95%CI, 11500–181000) | 77452 (95%CI, 11000–156000) |
| Mean haemoglobin (g/dl) | 9.6 ± 2.1 | 10.2 ± 1.7 |
Distribution of CQ treatment efficacy in Kolkata and Purulia during 2008–2009.
| Year | ACPR | ETF | LTF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolkata | Purulia | Kolkata | Purulia | Kolkata | Purulia | |||
| Recrud-escence | New infection | Recrud-escence | New infection | |||||
| 2008 | 38 (61.29%) | 41 (54.67%) | 18 (29.03%) | 28 (37.33%) | 5 (8.06%) | 1 (1.62%) | 6 (8.0%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| 2009 | 40 (53.33%) | 67 (53.17%) | 25 (33.33%) | 43 (34.13%) | 8 (10.67%) | 2 (2.67%) | 11 (8.73%) | 5 (3.97%) |
| Total | 78 (56.93%) | 108 (53.73%) | 43 (31.39%) | 71 (35.32%) | 13 (9.49%) | 3 (2.19%) | 17 (8.46%) | 5 (2.49%) |
Fig. 3Proportion of in vitro CQ resistance before and after new national drug policy. Mean IC50 values of CQ in successive years were presented.
Fig. 4Frequency of different pfcrt haplotype in Kolkata and Purulia in 2008–2013.
Distribution of different pfcrt and pfmdr1 haplotype in relation to in vivo CQ treatment efficacy and in vitro CQ susceptibility in Kolkata and Purulia before new national drug policy.
| Year | No of isolates | CQ treatment efficacy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (72–76) | 86,184, 10 34, 1042, 1246 | K | P | ACPR K | ACPR P | ETFK | ETFP | LTFK | LTFP | S K | S P | R K | R P | |
| 2008 | CVMNK | NYSND | 19 | 13 | 19 | 13 | – | – | – | – | 19 | 13 | – | – |
| CVMNK | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||
| NYSND | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 5 | 3 | |||
| CVMN | NYSND | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
| CVMN | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | 6 | 3 | ||
| CVMN | NYS | 4 | – | 3 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | – | |
| CVMN | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | – | 1 | – | 9 | 4 | ||
| NYSN | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 3 | 3 | ||
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | – | 2 | 1 | – | – | 7 | 4 | |||
| CVMNK | – | 23 | – | 4 | – | 17 | – | 2 | – | 2 | – | 21 | ||
| – | 10 | – | 1 | – | 7 | – | 2 | – | – | – | 10 | |||
| 2009 | CVMNK | NYSND | 21 | 5 | 21 | 5 | – | – | – | – | 21 | 5 | – | – |
| NYSND | 7 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 1 | – | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 20 | ||
| CVMNK | – | 37 | – | 5 | – | 26 | – | 6 | – | 4 | – | 33 | ||
| – | 11 | – | 1 | – | 8 | – | 2 | – | 1 | – | 10 | |||
| 3 | 4 | – | 2 | 3 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | 3 | 4 | |||
| CVMN | 11 | 12 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | 4 | 10 | 8 | ||
| NYS | 5 | – | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | – | ||
| CVMN | 15 | 3 | 3 | – | 11 | 3 | 1 | – | – | – | 15 | 3 | ||
| NYSN | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | |||||
| 6 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | 5 | 14 | |||
| N | 2 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 2 | – | ||
| CVMN | NYSND | – | 12 | – | 10 | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | 5 | – | 7 | |
| CVMN | NYSN | – | 2 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | |
Bold and underline amino acid are the mutant codon. Here in vitro test responses are classified as sensitive (S) (IC50 value < 100 nM) and Resistant (R) (IC50 value > 100 nM). Here K denotes for Kolkata and P denotes Purulia.
Fig. 5Allele frequency of different pfmdr1 haplotype in Kolkata and Purulia in 2008–2013.
Distribution of different pfcrt and pfmdr1 haplotype in relation to in vitro CQ susceptibility after implementation of ACT.
| Year | No of isolates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (72–76) | 86,184,1034,1042, 1246 | K | P | S K | S | R K | R | |
| 2010 | CVMNK | NYSND | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | – | – |
| 6 | – | – | 6 | – | ||||
| – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| CVMN | NYSND | – | 6 | – | 3 | – | 3 | |
| CVMN | 6 | 2 | 1 | – | 5 | 2 | ||
| NYS | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
| CVMN | 6 | 4 | 1 | – | 5 | 4 | ||
| 5 | – | – | – | 5 | – | |||
| 6 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 11 | ||||
| CVMNK | – | 8 | – | 2 | – | 6 | ||
| 11 | 12 | – | – | 11 | 12 | |||
| 2011 | CVMNK | NYSND | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | – | – |
| NYSND | 3 | – | 1 | – | 2 | – | ||
| CVMNK | – | 3 | – | 1 | – | 2 | ||
| 7 | 6 | – | – | 7 | 6 | |||
| CV | 4 | – | – | – | – | 4 | ||
| CV | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | ||||
| CVMN | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | ||
| – | 4 | – | – | – | 4 | |||
| 5 | 9 | – | 1 | 5 | 8 | |||
| 8 | 6 | – | – | 8 | 6 | |||
| 9 | 8 | – | – | 9 | 8 | |||
| 2012 | CVMNK | NYSND | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | – | – |
| CVMN | 3 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 7 | 12 | 1 | – | 6 | 12 | |||
| 5 | 9 | – | – | 5 | 9 | |||
| N | 6 | 9 | 1 | – | 5 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 4 | – | – | 3 | 4 | |||
| CV | 7 | 9 | – | – | 7 | 9 | ||
| CV | 4 | – | – | – | 4 | – | ||
| 10 | 12 | – | – | 10 | 12 | |||
| 8 | 13 | – | – | 8 | 13 | |||
| 2013 | CVMNK | NYSND | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | – | – |
| CVMN | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
| 3 | 5 | – | – | 3 | 5 | |||
| 9 | 13 | – | – | 9 | 13 | |||
| 6 | 8 | – | – | 6 | 8 | |||
| 2 | 4 | – | – | 2 | 4 | |||
| CV | 6 | 7 | – | – | 6 | 7 | ||
| CV | 8 | 11 | – | – | 8 | 11 | ||
| 4 | 3 | – | – | 4 | 3 | |||
Fig. 6AAlteration of in vitro IC50 values for CQ against different pfcrt and pfmdr1 haplotype in Kolkata and Purulia in 2008–2009. The solid line (corresponding to 100 nM of CQ) is hypothetical and shows the level of chloroquine resistance in vitro. ‘K’ represents for Kolkata and ‘P’ represents the haplotypes of Purulia. B: Variations of in vitro CQ, IC50 values in relation to different pfcrt and pfmdr1 haplotype in Kolkata and Purulia during 2010–2013. The solid line is hypothetical and shows the level of chloroquine resistance in vitro. ‘K’ represents for Kolkata and ‘P’ represents the haplotypes of Purulia.