Literature DB >> 28692815

Efficient generation of goats with defined point mutation (I397V) in GDF9 through CRISPR/Cas9.

Yiyuan Niu1, Xiaoe Zhao2, Jiankui Zhou3, Yan Li1, Yu Huang1, Bei Cai1, Yutai Liu2, Qiang Ding1, Shiwei Zhou1, Jin Zhao1, Guangxian Zhou1, Baohua Ma2, Xingxu Huang3, Xiaolong Wang1, Yulin Chen1.   

Abstract

The recent emergence of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) 9 system has attracted significant attention for its potential to improve traits of agricultural importance. However, most applications in livestock species to date have depended on aberrant DNA repair to generate frameshifting indels. Whether this genomic engineering technique involving homology-dependent repair (HDR) can be used to introduce defined point mutations has been less explored. Previously, we reported a G→A point mutation (g.231A>G, p.Val397Ile) in the growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) gene that has a large effect on the litter size of cashmere goats. In the present study we report that by co-injecting synthesised RNAs and single-stranded oligo deoxynucleotide (ssODN) donor sequences into goat zygotes, we successfully introduced defined point mutations resulting in single amino acid substitutions in the proteins as expected. The efficiency of this precise single-nucleotide substitution in newborn kids was as high as 24% (4/17), indicating that ssODN-directed HDR via zygote injection is efficient at introducing point mutations in the goat genome. The findings of the present study further highlight the complex genome modifications facilitated by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which is able to introduce defined point mutations. This represents a significant development for the improvement of reproduction traits in goats, as well as for validating the roles of specific nucleotides in functional genetic elements in large animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28692815     DOI: 10.1071/RD17068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

Review 1.  Application of CRISPR/Cas9 System in Establishing Large Animal Models.

Authors:  Yingqi Lin; Jun Li; Caijuan Li; Zhuchi Tu; Shihua Li; Xiao-Jiang Li; Sen Yan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 2.  In vivo genome editing thrives with diversified CRISPR technologies.

Authors:  Xun Ma; Avery Sum-Yu Wong; Hei-Yin Tam; Samuel Yung-Kin Tsui; Dittman Lai-Shun Chung; Bo Feng
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-03-18

3.  Highly efficient generation of sheep with a defined FecBB mutation via adenine base editing.

Authors:  Shiwei Zhou; Yige Ding; Jiao Liu; Yao Liu; Xiaoe Zhao; Guanwei Li; Chenguang Zhang; Chao Li; Ying Wang; Peter Kalds; Yawei Gao; Bo Zong; Xiaoyu Huang; Shuhong Huang; Honghao Yu; Qifang Kou; Bjoern Petersen; Xingxu Huang; Xiaolong Wang; Baohua Ma; Yulin Chen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 4.  Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock.

Authors:  Iuri Viotti Perisse; Zhiqiang Fan; Galina N Singina; Kenneth L White; Irina A Polejaeva
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Enhancing Animal Disease Resistance, Production Efficiency, and Welfare through Precise Genome Editing.

Authors:  Zhiguo Liu; Tianwen Wu; Guangming Xiang; Hui Wang; Bingyuan Wang; Zheng Feng; Yulian Mu; Kui Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Cytoplasmic Injection of Zygotes to Genome Edit Naturally Occurring Sequence Variants Into Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Jingwei Wei; Brigid Brophy; Sally-Ann Cole; Jannis Moormann; Jens Boch; Gӧtz Laible
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The transformational impact of site-specific DNA modifiers on biomedicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Kathryn Polkoff; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.807

8.  Genetic engineering a large animal model of human hypophosphatasia in sheep.

Authors:  Diarra K Williams; Carlos Pinzón; Shannon Huggins; Jane H Pryor; Alyssa Falck; Forrest Herman; James Oldeschulte; Michael B Chavez; Brian L Foster; Sarah H White; Mark E Westhusin; Larry J Suva; Charles R Long; Dana Gaddy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Otoferlin gene editing in sheep via CRISPR-assisted ssODN-mediated Homology Directed Repair.

Authors:  A Menchaca; P C Dos Santos-Neto; M Souza-Neves; F Cuadro; A P Mulet; L Tesson; V Chenouard; A Guiffès; J M Heslan; M Gantier; I Anegón; M Crispo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  CRISPR in livestock: From editing to printing.

Authors:  A Menchaca; P C Dos Santos-Neto; A P Mulet; M Crispo
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.740

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.