Literature DB >> 28689822

Fracture line morphology of complex proximal humeral fractures.

Afsana P Hasan1, Joideep Phadnis2, Ruurd L Jaarsma3, Gregory I Bain3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess proximal humeral fracture patterns using 3-dimensional computed tomography images and relate them to the normal osseous landmarks and soft-tissue attachments.
METHODS: Forty-eight 3-dimensional computed tomography scans of proximal humeral fractures were retrospectively collected, and the fractures were transcribed onto proximal humeral templates. We analyzed the common location and orientation of the fracture lines, with a focus on fractures of the articular surface, tuberosities, metaphysis, and proximal diaphysis. These fractures were compared with the attachments of the rotator cuff and glenohumeral capsule.
RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the fractures involved the articular surface. No fractures passed through the bicipital groove, and fractures were more commonly found on the posterior lesser tuberosity and on the anterior greater tuberosity, coinciding with the intervals between the rotator cuff tendon insertions. Intracapsular fractures of the calcar were more common (68%) than extracapsular fractures (32%). On the anterolateral aspect of the proximal humerus, fractures radiated from the articular margin, vertically down through the tuberosity zone between the rotator cuff footprints, meeting horizontally oriented fractures in the metaphyseal zone. On the posterior aspect, vertical fractures from the tuberosity zone continued downward to the metaphyseal zone adjacent to the infraspinatus and teres minor footprints.
CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the proximal humerus follow characteristic patterns. Fractures frequently split the greater tuberosity and are closely related to the intervals of the rotator cuff attachments. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture; classification; pattern; proximal humerus; rotator cuff footprint; three-dimensional CT; tracing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689822     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Influence of rotator cuff preload on fracture configuration in proximal humerus fractures: a proof of concept for fracture simulation.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stephanie Kahmann; Mehdi Behbahani; Lenhard Pennig; Michael Hackl; Tim Leschinger; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Risk factors for intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Owain Critchley; Simon MacLean; Afsana Hasan; Richard Woodman; Gregory Bain
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Greater tuberosity fractures are not a continuation of Hill-Sachs lesions, but do they have a similar etiology?

Authors:  Hassanin Alkaduhimi; Henk-Jan van der Woude; Lukas P E Verweij; Stein J Janssen; Nienke W Willigenburg; Neal Chen; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  The reliability of the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures: a survey of orthopedic shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Mikaël Chelli; Gregory Gasbarro; Vincent Lavoué; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-Luc Raynier; Christophe Trojani; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-26

5.  Three-dimensional mapping of intertrochanteric fracture lines.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zhi-Rui Li; Jian-Tao Li; Ming-Xing Lei; Xiu-Yun Su; Guo-Qi Wang; Hao Zhang; Gao-Xiang Xu; Peng Yin; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.