Literature DB >> 28688907

Face identity recognition in simulated prosthetic vision is poorer than previously reported and can be improved by caricaturing.

Jessica L Irons1, Tamara Gradden2, Angel Zhang2, Xuming He3, Nick Barnes4, Adele F Scott5, Elinor McKone6.   

Abstract

The visual prosthesis (or "bionic eye") has become a reality but provides a low resolution view of the world. Simulating prosthetic vision in normal-vision observers, previous studies report good face recognition ability using tasks that allow recognition to be achieved on the basis of information that survives low resolution well, including basic category (sex, age) and extra-face information (hairstyle, glasses). Here, we test within-category individuation for face-only information (e.g., distinguishing between multiple Caucasian young men with hair covered). Under these conditions, recognition was poor (although above chance) even for a simulated 40×40 array with all phosphene elements assumed functional, a resolution above the upper end of current-generation prosthetic implants. This indicates that a significant challenge is to develop methods to improve face identity recognition. Inspired by "bionic ear" improvements achieved by altering signal input to match high-level perceptual (speech) requirements, we test a high-level perceptual enhancement of face images, namely face caricaturing (exaggerating identity information away from an average face). Results show caricaturing improved identity recognition in memory and/or perception (degree by which two faces look dissimilar) down to a resolution of 32×32 with 30% phosphene dropout. Findings imply caricaturing may offer benefits for patients at resolutions realistic for some current-generation or in-development implants.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caricaturing; Face recognition; Prosthetic vision; Retinal prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688907     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants.

Authors:  Sabrina J Meikle; Yan T Wong
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Improving face identity perception in age-related macular degeneration via caricaturing.

Authors:  Jo Lane; Emilie M F Rohan; Faran Sabeti; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess; Nick Barnes; Xuming He; Rachel A Robbins; Tamara Gradden; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Performance of complex visual tasks using simulated prosthetic vision via augmented-reality glasses.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Jack Boffa; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Semantic and structural image segmentation for prosthetic vision.

Authors:  Melani Sanchez-Garcia; Ruben Martinez-Cantin; Jose J Guerrero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Caricatured facial movements enhance perception of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Forida Begum; Francesca Pizzorni Ferrarese; Sarah Jans; Caroline Woolley; Justin Sulik
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 6.  Clinical Progress and Optimization of Information Processing in Artificial Visual Prostheses.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Rongfeng Zhao; Peitong Li; Zhiqiang Fang; Qianqian Li; Yanling Han; Ruyan Zhou; Yun Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Caricaturing faces to improve identity recognition in low vision simulations: How effective is current-generation automatic assignment of landmark points?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Rachel A Robbins; Xuming He; Nick Barnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impacts of impaired face perception on social interactions and quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: A qualitative study and new community resources.

Authors:  Jo Lane; Emilie M F Rohan; Faran Sabeti; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess; Amy Dawel; Rachel A Robbins; Nick Barnes; Xuming He; Elinor McKone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.