Literature DB >> 28688529

Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.

Natalie Domenick Sridharan1, Partha Thirumala2, Rabih Chaer3, Jeffrey Balzer2, Becky Long3, Donald Crammond2, Michel Makaroun3, Efthymios Avgerinos3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using intraoperative monitoring (IOM) for detection of cerebral ischemia is well established. There is mounting evidence that monitoring of both electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) increases the sensitivity of cerebral ischemia detection. Predictors of cerebral ischemia requiring selective shunt placement using IOM of both EEG and SSEPs have not been previously identified.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent CEA between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, were retrospectively analyzed. Primary end points were IOM changes at any time during the operation or IOM changes with carotid cross-clamping. Risk factors assessed included demographics; baseline comorbidities; severity of ipsilateral and contralateral disease; symptomatic status; and use of statin, antiplatelet, and beta-blocker medications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis.
RESULTS: During the 11-year study period, a total of 758 patients underwent 804 CEAs (mean age, 70.6 ± 9.5 years; 59.8% male; 39.2% symptomatic) using IOM of both SSEPs and EEG for selective shunting guidance. Postoperative stroke rate was 1.37%; 27.1% of patients had significant SSEP or EEG changes, and 49.1% of these were clamp induced (within 5 minutes of cross-clamping). Of these patients, 83.2% received a shunt (11.4% overall). The most common reason that a shunt was not placed after cross-clamp-induced changes was that the changes resolved with further blood pressure elevation (8 of 17 patients). Clamp-induced IOM changes were predictive of postoperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; P = .005). Risk factors for clamp-induced IOM changes were contralateral carotid occlusion (OR, 2.5; P = .01), symptomatic stenosis (OR, 1.8; P = .006), and diabetes (OR, 1.6; P = .03), whereas there was a trend toward increased risk with female sex (OR, 1.5; P = .08). Risk factors for any IOM change (clamp and nonclamp induced) were symptomatic carotid stenosis (OR, 1.8; P < .001), use of beta blockers (OR, 1.5; P = .03), and female sex (OR, 1.5; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas some patients can be expected to experience IOM changes by monitoring of SSEPs and EEG, a much smaller percentage will receive a shunt. Contralateral carotid occlusion, symptomatic stenosis, diabetes, and female sex increase the risk of clamp-induced IOM changes and should be anticipated to need a shunt. Patients receiving beta blockers are likely to experience IOM changes during the operation that are not associated with clamping.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688529      PMCID: PMC5741499          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  39 in total

1.  Outcome of carotid artery interventions among female patients, 2004 to 2005.

Authors:  Caron B Rockman; Karan Garg; Glenn R Jacobowitz; Jeffrey S Berger; Firas F Mussa; Neal S Cayne; Mark A Adelman; Thomas S Maldonado
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Prediction of cerebral ischemic tolerance during carotid cross-clamping by angiographic criteria.

Authors:  M Aleksic; M Gawenda; J Heckenkamp; V Matoussevitch; S Coburger; J Brunkwall
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.069

3.  Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.

Authors:  John J Ricotta; Ali Aburahma; Enrico Ascher; Mark Eskandari; Peter Faries; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Intracranial atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Louis R Caplan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Influence of the contralateral carotid artery on carotid surgery outcome.

Authors:  Benjamin Kretz; Nicolas Abello; Karine Astruc; Beatrice Terriat; Claire Favier; Olivier Bouchot; Roger Brenot; Eric Steinmetz
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 6.  Shunting during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Ali F Aburahma; Albeir Y Mousa; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Predictors of shunt during carotid endarterectomy with routine electroencephalography monitoring.

Authors:  Tze-Woei Tan; Manuel Garcia-Toca; Edward J Marcaccio; Wilfred I Carney; Jason T Machan; Jeffrey M Slaiby
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Halliday; A Mansfield; J Marro; C Peto; R Peto; J Potter; D Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Use of hypertension and electroencephalographic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  R R Hansebout; G Blomquist; P Gloor; C Thompson; D Trop
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study.

Authors:  D Doig; E L Turner; J Dobson; R L Featherstone; G J de Borst; M M Brown; T Richards
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 7.069

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jithendhar Kandimalla; Zain Hussain; Paisith Piriyawat; Gustavo Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Rakesh Khatri; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Anantha R Vellipuram
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The utility of adjunctive electroencephalography while performing transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Drew J Braet; Naveen Balasundaram; Tiffany S Meller; Jonathan Bath; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-11-09

3.  Carotid Endarterectomy Surgeries: A Multimodality Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Approach.

Authors:  Faisal R Jahangiri; Marie Liang; Misty Huckabey; Naomi Baloney; Sarah Sharifi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.