Literature DB >> 28688224

Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Error and Patient Safety" and EFLM Task and Finish Group "Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases".

Laura Sciacovelli1, Mauro Panteghini1, Giuseppe Lippi1, Zorica Sumarac1, Janne Cadamuro1, César Alex De Olivera Galoro1, Isabel Garcia Del Pino Castro1, Wilson Shcolnik1, Mario Plebani1.   

Abstract

The improving quality of laboratory testing requires a deep understanding of the many vulnerable steps involved in the total examination process (TEP), along with the identification of a hierarchy of risks and challenges that need to be addressed. From this perspective, the Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" (WG-LEPS) of International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) is focusing its activity on implementation of an efficient tool for obtaining meaningful information on the risk of errors developing throughout the TEP, and for establishing reliable information about error frequencies and their distribution. More recently, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has created the Task and Finish Group "Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases" (TFG-PSEP) for defining performance specifications for extra-analytical phases. Both the IFCC and EFLM groups are working to provide laboratories with a system to evaluate their performances and recognize the critical aspects where improvement actions are needed. A Consensus Conference was organized in Padova, Italy, in 2016 in order to bring together all the experts and interested parties to achieve a consensus for effective harmonization of quality indicators (QIs). A general agreement was achieved and the main outcomes have been the release of a new version of model of quality indicators (MQI), the approval of a criterion for establishing performance specifications and the definition of the type of information that should be provided within the report to the clinical laboratories participating to the QIs project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extra-analytical phases; harmonization; patient safety; performance specifications; quality indicators; total testing process

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688224     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Real-world use of key performance indicators for point-of-Care Testing network accredited by ISO 22870.

Authors:  Paloma Oliver; Pilar Fernandez-Calle; Roberto Mora; Jorge Diaz-Garzon; Daniel Prieto; Marta Manzano; Inmaculada Dominguez; Antonio Buño
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-11-06

2.  European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 1: How do European laboratories monitor the preanalytical phase? On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Giuseppe Lippi; Alexander von Meyer; Mercedes Ibarz; Edmee van Dongen; Michael Cornes; Mads Nybo; Pieter Vermeersch; Kjell Grankvist; Joao Tiago Guimaraes; Gunn B B Kristensen; Barbara de la Salle; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Enhance the effectiveness of clinical laboratory critical values initiative notification by implementing a closed-loop system: A five-year retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Runqing Li; Tengjiao Wang; Lijun Gong; Jingxiao Dong; Nan Xiao; Xiaohuan Yang; Dong Zhu; Zhipeng Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions.

Authors:  Cornelia Mrazek; Giuseppe Lippi; Martin H Keppel; Thomas K Felder; Hannes Oberkofler; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher; Janne Cadamuro
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  Detection of haemolysis, a frequent preanalytical problem in the serum of newborns and adults.

Authors:  Judit Tóth; Anna V Oláh; Tamás Petercsák; Tamás Kovács; János Kappelmayer
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-03-20

6.  Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review.

Authors:  Anne Vincent; Donnah Pocius; Yun Huang
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Benchmarking diagnostic laboratory performance: Survey results for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huf; Mike Mohns; Tetiana Garmatiuk; Rebecca Lister; Christoph Buchta; Brigitte Ettl; Ursula Köller
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.275

8.  A sudden creatinine increase: A case report.

Authors:  Bernhard Strasser; Sebastian Strasser; Josef Tomasits
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  The response of total testing process in clinical laboratory medicine to COVID-19
pandemic.

Authors:  Funda Eren; Merve Ergin Tuncay; Esra Firat Oguz; Salim Neselioglu; Ozcan Erel
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 10.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.