Literature DB >> 28687458

Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Jianping Zhang1, Zhiyuan Cheng2, Yubao Ma1, Caili He1, Yongbin Lu1, Yaxue Zhao1, Xiaoyu Chang1, Yawei Zhang3, Yana Bai1, Ning Cheng4.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRC; Colonoscopy; Incidence; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687458     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  22 in total

1.  Plasma Histone H4 and H4K20 Trimethylation Levels Differ Between Colon Cancer and Precancerous Polyps.

Authors:  Emre Özgür; Metin Keskin; Ebru E Yörüker; Stefan Holdenrieder; Ugur Gezer
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  The role of gut microbiota in the development of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Navami Koyande; Madhusree Gangopadhyay; Shashidhar Thatikonda; Aravind Kumar Rengan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Identifying the factors promoting colorectal cancer screening uptake in Hong Kong using Andersen's behavioural model of health services use.

Authors:  Dorothy N S Chan; K C Choi; Doreen W H Au; Winnie K W So
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  Characteristics of colorectal cancers among Alaska Native people before and after implementing programs to promote screening.

Authors:  Sarah H Nash; Carla Britton; Diana Redwood
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2021-07-12

5.  Combining old and new strategies for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Elisa Danese; Martina Montagnana; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

6.  Symptom Perceptions and Help-Seeking Behaviours of Omani Patients Diagnosed with Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mahera Al Suqri; Huda Al-Awaisi; Mansour Al-Moundhri; Mohammed Al-Azri
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 7.  Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations.

Authors:  Florence Bénard; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Daniel von Renteln
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Identification of ZNF26 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer by an Integrated Bioinformatic Analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxin Liu; Yimin Li; Yaqi Gan; Qing Xiao; Ruotong Tian; Guang Shu; Gang Yin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  Colonoscopy overuse in colorectal cancer screening and associated factors in Argentina: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Santiago Esteban; Ricardo Ricci; Sergio Terrasa; Karin Kopitowski
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection and/or prognosis.

Authors:  Romain Villéger; Amélie Lopès; Julie Veziant; Johan Gagnière; Nicolas Barnich; Elisabeth Billard; Delphine Boucher; Mathilde Bonnet
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.