Literature DB >> 28685497

Linear combinations come alive in crossover designs.

Jonathan J Shuster1.   

Abstract

Before learning anything about statistical inference in beginning service courses in biostatistics, students learn how to calculate the mean and variance of linear combinations of random variables. Practical precalculus examples of the importance of these exercises can be helpful for instructors, the target audience of this paper. We shall present applications to the "1-sample" and "2-sample" methods for randomized short-term 2-treatment crossover studies, where patients experience both treatments in random order with a "washout" between the active treatment periods. First, we show that the 2-sample method is preferred as it eliminates "conditional bias" when sample sizes by order differ and produces a smaller variance. We also demonstrate that it is usually advisable to use the differences in posttests (ignoring baseline and post washout values) rather than the differences between the changes in treatment from the start of the period to the end of the period ("delta of delta"). Although the intent is not to provide a definitive discussion of crossover designs, we provide a section and references to excellent alternative methods, where instructors can provide motivation to students to explore the topic in greater detail in future readings or courses.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delta of Delta; crossover trial; linear combination; relative efficiency; variance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685497      PMCID: PMC5624826          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  THE TWO-PERIOD CHANGE-OVER DESIGN AN ITS USE IN CLINICAL TRIALS.

Authors:  J E GRIZZLE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Diagnostics for assumptions in moderate to large simple clinical trials: do they really help?

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The use of baseline covariates in crossover studies.

Authors:  Michael G Kenward; James H Roger
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials.

Authors:  P R Freeman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover design.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-09

7.  The two-period cross-over clinical trial.

Authors:  M Hills; P Armitage
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  The AB/BA crossover: past, present and future?

Authors:  S Senn
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Student t-tests for potentially abnormal data.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Dropouts in the AB/BA crossover design.

Authors:  Weang Kee Ho; John N S Matthews; Robin Henderson; Daniel Farewell; Lauren R Rodgers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.