Felizitas C Wermter1,2, Nico Mitschke1, Christian Bock2, Wolfgang Dreher3. 1. Department of Chemistry, in vivo-MR Group, University Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany. 2. Integrative Ecophysiology, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany. 3. Department of Chemistry, in vivo-MR Group, University Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany. wdreher@uni-bremen.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Temperature dependent chemical shifts of important brain metabolites measured by localised 1H MRS were investigated to test how the use of incorrect prior knowledge on chemical shifts impairs the quantification of metabolite concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom measurements on solutions containing 11 metabolites were performed on a 7 T scanner between 1 and 43 °C. The temperature dependence of the chemical shift differences was fitted by a linear model. Spectra were simulated for different temperatures and analysed by the AQSES program (jMRUI 5.2) using model functions with chemical shift values for 37 °C. RESULTS: Large differences in the temperature dependence of the chemical shift differences were determined with a maximum slope of about ±7.5 × 10-4 ppm/K. For 32-40 °C, only minor quantification errors resulted from using incorrect chemical shifts, with the exception of Cr and PCr. For 1-10 °C considerable quantification errors occurred if the temperature dependence of the chemical shifts was neglected. CONCLUSION: If 1H MRS measurements are not performed at 37 °C, for which the published chemical shift values have been determined, the temperature dependence of chemical shifts should be considered to avoid systematic quantification errors, particularly for measurements on animal models at lower temperatures.
OBJECTIVES: Temperature dependent chemical shifts of important brain metabolites measured by localised 1HMRS were investigated to test how the use of incorrect prior knowledge on chemical shifts impairs the quantification of metabolite concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom measurements on solutions containing 11 metabolites were performed on a 7 T scanner between 1 and 43 °C. The temperature dependence of the chemical shift differences was fitted by a linear model. Spectra were simulated for different temperatures and analysed by the AQSES program (jMRUI 5.2) using model functions with chemical shift values for 37 °C. RESULTS: Large differences in the temperature dependence of the chemical shift differences were determined with a maximum slope of about ±7.5 × 10-4 ppm/K. For 32-40 °C, only minor quantification errors resulted from using incorrect chemical shifts, with the exception of Cr and PCr. For 1-10 °C considerable quantification errors occurred if the temperature dependence of the chemical shifts was neglected. CONCLUSION: If 1HMRS measurements are not performed at 37 °C, for which the published chemical shift values have been determined, the temperature dependence of chemical shifts should be considered to avoid systematic quantification errors, particularly for measurements on animal models at lower temperatures.
Authors: Dinesh Kumar Deelchand; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Isabelle Iltis; Peter Andersen; John P Strupp; J Thomas Vaughan; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-Gilles Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Małgorzata Marjańska; Edward J Auerbach; Romain Valabrègue; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Michael Garwood Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Pierre-Gilles Henry; Kevin P Russeth; Ivan Tkac; Lester R Drewes; Matthew T Andrews; Rolf Gruetter Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: D S Wishart; C G Bigam; J Yao; F Abildgaard; H J Dyson; E Oldfield; J L Markley; B D Sykes Journal: J Biomol NMR Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Muhammad G Saleh; Mark Mikkelsen; Georg Oeltzschner; Kimberly L Chan; Adam Berrington; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel M Spielman; Meng Gu; Ralph E Hurd; R Kirk Riemer; Kenichi Okamura; Frank L Hanley Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.478