Literature DB >> 28685228

Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial Ischemia Assessed by SPECT MPI.

Jeff M Smit1, Gerhard Koning2, Alexander R van Rosendael1, Petra Dibbets-Schneider3, Bart J Mertens4, J Wouter Jukema1, Victoria Delgado1, Johan H C Reiber2,5, Jeroen J Bax1, Arthur J Scholte6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A new method has been developed to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) from invasive coronary angiography, the so-called "contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR)". Recently, cQFR was compared to invasive FFR in intermediate coronary lesions showing an overall diagnostic accuracy of 85%. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cQFR and myocardial ischemia assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI).
METHODS: Patients who underwent SPECT MPI and coronary angiography within 3 months were included. The cQFR computation was performed offline, using dedicated software. The cQFR computation was based on 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and computational fluid dynamics. The standard 17-segment model was used to determine the vascular territories. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a summed difference score ≥2 in a vascular territory. A cQFR of ≤0.80 was considered abnormal.
RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four coronary arteries were analysed in 85 patients. Overall accuracy of cQFR to detect ischemia on SPECT MPI was 90%. In multivariable analysis, cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI (OR per 0.01 decrease of cQFR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002), whereas clinical and QCA parameters were not. Furthermore, cQFR showed incremental value for the detection of ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters (global chi square 48.7 to 62.6; p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A good relationship between cQFR and SPECT MPI was found. cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI and showed incremental value to detect ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Non-invasive imaging; Quantitative coronary angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685228     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3769-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  16 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Bernhard Bornschein; Marcel van't Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Andy S C Yong; Austin C C Ng; David Brieger; Harry C Lowe; Martin K C Ng; Leonard Kritharides
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Narbeh Melikian; Pieter De Bondt; Pim Tonino; Olivier De Winter; Eric Wyffels; Jozef Bartunek; Guy R Heyndrickx; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Philip B Dattilo; Anand Prasad; Emily Honeycutt; Tracy Y Wang; John C Messenger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it?

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Nobuhiro Tanaka; William F Fearon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Emanuele Barbato; Zsolt Köszegi; Junqing Yang; Zhonghua Sun; Niels R Holm; Balázs Tar; Yingguang Li; Dan Rusinaru; William Wijns; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Liang Xu; Jurgen Ligthart; Bo Xu; Karen Witberg; Zhongwei Sun; Gerhard Koning; Johan H C Reiber; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chang; Liwei Chen; Jelmer Westra; Zhongwei Sun; Changdong Guan; Yimin Zhang; Daixin Ding; Bo Xu; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Impact of diabetes on coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Qin Chen; Jiaxin Zhong; Long Chen; Lihua Chen; Mingfang Ye; Yuanming Yan; Lianglong Chen; Yukun Luo
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Functional classification discordance in intermediate coronary stenoses between fractional flow reserve and angiography-based quantitative flow ratio.

Authors:  Yoshinori Kanno; Masahiro Hoshino; Rikuta Hamaya; Tomoyo Sugiyama; Yoshihisa Kanaji; Eisuke Usui; Masao Yamaguchi; Masahiro Hada; Hiroaki Ohya; Yohei Sumino; Hidenori Hirano; Haruhito Yuki; Tomoki Horie; Tadashi Murai; Tetsumin Lee; Taishi Yonetsu; Tsunekazu Kakuta
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-01-23

4.  Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy.

Authors:  Martin Sejr-Hansen; Jelmer Westra; Simon Winther; Shengxian Tu; Louise Nissen; Lars Gormsen; Steffen E Petersen; June Ejlersen; Christin Isaksen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Morten Bøttcher; Evald H Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.