| Literature DB >> 28684691 |
Urszula Krupa-Kozak1, Lidia H Markiewicz2, Grzegorz Lamparski3, Jerzy Juśkiewicz4.
Abstract
In <span class="Disease">coeliac disease (CD), the risk of adverse <span class="Chemical">calcium balance and reduced bone density is induced mainly by the disease, but also by a gluten-free diet (GFD), the only accepted CD therapy. Prebiotics through the beneficial impact on intestinal microbiota may stimulate calcium (Ca) absorption. In the present study, we hypothesised that the dietary inulin in GFD would influence positively the intestinal microbiota, and by that will stimulate the absorption of calcium (Ca), especially in the conditions of Ca malnutrition. In a six-weeks nutritional experiment on growing a significant (p < 0.05) luminal acidification, decrease in ammonia concentration and stimulation of short chain fatty acids formation indicated inulin-mediated beneficial effects on the caecal microbiota. However, the effect of inulin on characteristics of intestinal microbiota and mineral utilization depended on the dietary Ca intake from GFDs. Inulin stimulated bifidobacteria, in particular B. animalis species, only if a recommended amount of Ca was provided. Most benefits to mineral utilization from inulin consumption were seen in rats fed Ca-restricted GFD where it increased the relative Ca absorption. Administration of inulin to a GFDs could be a promising dietary strategy for beneficial modulation of intestinal ecosystem and by that for the improvement the Ca absorption.Entities:
Keywords: SCFA; calcium balance; gluten-free bread; intestinal microbiota; prebiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28684691 PMCID: PMC5537817 DOI: 10.3390/nu9070702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Experimental gluten-free diets.
| O | R | OI | RI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bread ingredients as diet compounds (%) | ||||
| Corn starch | 48.4 | 49.8 | 40.4 | 41.8 |
| Potato starch | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 |
| Pectin | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Sugar | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Salt | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Sunflower oil | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Yeast | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| CAS * | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| CIT & | 2.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 0.6 |
| Inulin # | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Other diet compounds (%) | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| Soya oil | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Ca-free mineral mix † | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix § | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Energy density (kcal/g) | 4.01 | 4.00 | 3.82 | 3.80 |
O—GFD of recommended Ca content; OI—GFD of recommended Ca content with inulin; R—GFD of reduced Ca content; RI—GFD of reduced Ca content with inulin, * Calcium caseinate (contained: 92.8% protein, 2.06% fat, 4.01% ash, 5.12% moisture), & Calcium citrate (E 333(iii); contained 21.98 ppm of Ca), # Frutafit HD; contained 99.5% carbohydrates (≥90% inulin, ≤10% fructose, glucose, sacchcrose), † Mineral mix AIN-93G-MX without Ca [29], § Vitamin mix AIN-93G-VM [29].
Daily food intake, body weight (BW) gain and gastrointestinal tract parameters in rats fed experimental GF diets *.
| Diets | Ca Effect | Inulin Effect | Ca × I | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | R | OI | RI | ||||
| Daily food intake (g/animal) | 13.90 ± 1.22 | 13.15 ± 1.56 | 13.83 ± 0.54 | 13.26 ± 0.95 | 0.0688 | 0.7049 | 0.9054 |
| Daily BW gain (g/animal) | 4.55 ± 0.45 | 4.61 ± 0.53 | 4.42 ± 0.30 | 4.38 ± 0.34 | 0.9477 | 0.2312 | 0.7594 |
| Small intestinal parameters | |||||||
| Weight (g/100 g BW) | 3.10 ± 0.13 | 2.86 ± 0.19 | 3.26 ± 0.32 | 3.19 ± 0.34 | 0.0983 | 0.0139 | 0.3633 |
| pH of small intestinal digesta | 7.03 ± 0.22 | 7.02 ± 0.18 | 6.86 ± 0.20 | 6.67 ± 0.24 | 0.1991 | 0.0015 | 0.2282 |
| Caecum parameters | |||||||
| Weight of tissue (g/100 g BW) | 0.320 ± 0.03 c | 0.332 ± 0.03 c | 0.436 ± 0.04 b | 0.587 ± 0.08 a | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Weight of digesta (g/100 g BW) | 1.124 ± 0.198 b | 1.112 ± 0.202 b | 1.441 ± 0.240 b | 3.110 ± 0.694 a | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| DM content of digesta (%) | 16.79 ± 1.34 | 15.65 ± 1.42 | 15.50 ± 1.33 | 14.79 ± 1.40 | 0.0671 | 0.0346 | 0.6537 |
| Ammonia (mg/g digesta) | 0.191 ± 0.026 | 0.183 ± 0.018 | 0.141 ± 0.016 | 0.154 ± 0.022 | 0.7069 | <0.001 | 0.1704 |
| pH of digesta | 6.79 ± 0.13 | 6.53 ± 0.18 | 6.18 ± 0.24 | 5.83 ± 0.39 | 0.0019 | <0.001 | 0.5949 |
| Colonic parameters | |||||||
| Weight of tissue (g/100 g BW) | 0.531 ± 0.072 a,b | 0.467 ± 0.042 b | 0.535 ± 0.055 a,b | 0.621 ± 0.094 a | 0.6517 | 0.0028 | 0.0044 |
| Weight of digesta (g/100 g BW) | 0.519 ± 0.108 b | 0.389 ± 0.153 c | 0.570 ± 0.095 a,b | 0.658 ± 0.078 a | 0.5933 | <0.001 | 0.0104 |
| pH of digesta | 6.71 ± 0.186 | 6.11 ± 0.178 | 6.11 ± 0.168 | 5.66 ± 0.132 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.2046 |
Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. * O, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content and inulin. BW, body weight. a,b,c Mean values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The differences between groups O, R, OI and RI groups are indicated with superscripts only when Ca × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
The concentration of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), putrefactive SCFAs (PSCFAs) and their profiles in the caecal digesta of rats fed experimental GFDs *.
| Diets | Ca Effect | Inulin Effect | Ca × I | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | R | OI | RI | ||||
| SCFAs (μM/g digesta) | |||||||
| Acetic | 55.17 ± 7.19 b | 53.22 ± 9.46 b | 58.49 ± 8.56 a | 35.14 ± 8.94 c | <0.001 | 0.0216 | 0.0015 |
| Propionic | 16.30 ± 1.39 c | 28.51 ± 6.15 b | 39.91 ± 7.65 a | 27.57 ± 7.48 b | 0.9768 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Iso-butyric | 0.41 ± 0.22 | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.13 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.0187 | 0.9336 |
| Butyric | 6.09 ± 2.02 b | 5.68 ± 0.72 b | 8.92 ± 2.79 a | 2.31 ± 1.64 c | <0.001 | 0.6953 | <0.001 |
| Iso-valeric | 0.70 ± 0.21 | 0.44 ± 0.17 | 0.25 ± 0.13 | 0.14 ± 0.06 | 0.0016 | <0.001 | 0.1738 |
| Valeric | 1.28 ± 0.24 | 0.67 ± 0.14 | 0.64 ± 0.18 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.5737 |
| PSCFAs | 2.39 ± 0.50 | 1.28 ± 0.21 | 1.19 ± 0.29 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.4801 |
| Total SCFAs | 79.95 ± 9.43 b | 88.69 ± 13.98 b | 108.50 ± 13.95 a | 65.31 ± 17.43 c | 0.0017 | 0.6097 | <0.001 |
| C2:C3:C4 profile (%) | |||||||
| C2 | 69 a | 60 b | 54 c | 54 c | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C3 | 21 c | 32 b | 37 b | 42 a | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.0070 |
| C4 | 8 a | 6 b | 8 a | 4 c | <0.001 | 0.1097 | 0.0086 |
Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. * O, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content and inulin. BW, body weight. a,b,c Mean values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The differences between groups O, R, OI and RI groups are indicated with superscripts only when Ca × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
The activity of bacterial enzymes in the caecal digesta of rats fed the experimental GFDs *.
| Diets | Ca Effect | Inulin Effect | Ca × I | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | R | OI | RI | ||||
| α-Glucosidase (μmol/h/g) | 13.86 ± 7.28 | 31.80 ± 13.76 | 29.74 ± 10.55 | 40.72 ± 10.99 | <0.001 | 0.0032 | 0.3737 |
| β-Glucosidase (μmol/h/g) | 4.94 ± 1.49 b | 7.53 ± 1.30 a | 6.90 ± 1.74 a | 3.82 ± 0.71 b | 0.6205 | 0.0803 | <0.001 |
| α-Galactosidase (μmol/h/g) | 7.86 ± 1.71 | 4.48 ± 0.92 | 8.22 ± 3.58 | 7.84 ± 4.92 | 0.1066 | 0.1096 | 0.1939 |
| β-Galactosidase (μmol/h/g) | 27.37 ± 8.85 | 44.19 ± 10.08 | 48.99 ± 19.22 | 56.56 ± 19.59 | 0.0319 | 0.0039 | 0.3995 |
| β-Glucuronidase (μmol/h/g) | 18.82 ± 6.14 a | 4.77 ± 1.98 b | 5.67 ± 2.71 b | 1.85 ± 0.98 c | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. * O, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed GFD with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed GFD with restricted calcium content and inulin. BW, body weight. a,b,c Mean values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The differences between groups O, R, OI and RI groups are indicated with superscripts only when Ca × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Counts of Bacteroides-Prevotella-Porphyromonas (BPP), Lactobacillus (LAC), Bifidobacterium (BIF), Clostridium leptum group (Clept), Enterococcus (ECC) and total bacterial number (TBN) of caecal microbiota of rats fed the experimental GFDs. Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation; O, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content and inulin. Significant differences between groups O, R, OI and RI are indicated with superscripts only when C × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 2DGGE banding patterns of caecal bacteria obtained with universal primers. Frames depict gel positions assigned to a specific bacterial taxon based on band sequencing (see Supplementary Information, Figure S1). O and R—diets with recommended and restricted calcium intake, respectively. OI and RI—diets O and R supplemented with inulin. Paired comparisons, O vs. R (a), O vs. OI (b), R vs. RI (c) and OI vs. RI (d), were performed based on profile similarities calculated using the Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Dendrograms were constructed using the UPGMA algorithm.
Figure 3DGGE banding patterns of caecal Bacteroides population. Frames depict gel positions assigned to a specific bacterial taxon based on band sequencing (see Supplementary Information, Figure S1). O and R–diets with recommended and restricted calcium intake, respectively. OI and RI—diets O and R supplemented with inulin. Paired comparisons, O vs. R (a), O vs. OI (b), R vs. RI (c) and OI vs. RI (d), were performed based on profile similarities calculated using the Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Dendrograms were constructed using the UPGMA algorithm.
Figure 4A three-dimensional MDS plot presenting the average similarities between the caecal microbiota of rats fed diets with the recommended (O, green dots) and decreased calcium levels (R, red dots) and supplemented with inulin (OI (blue dots) and RI (yellow dots), respectively). A multidimensional scaling analysis was preformed based on the similarity matrix generated during the composite data analysis of DGGE profiles of eubacteria, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus and C. leptum group bacteria.
Intestinal absorption and retention of calcium, magnesium and phosphorus in rats fed experimental GF diets *.
| Diets | Ca Effect | Inulin Effect | Ca × I | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | R | OI | RI | ||||
| Calcium | |||||||
| Intake (mg/day) | 86.21 ± 7.87 a | 35.64 ± 4.24 b | 80.46 ± 5.37 a | 33.95 ± 2.44 b | <0.001 | 0.0024 | 0.0220 |
| Faecal excretion (mg/day) | 22.68 ± 4.08 | 2.01 ± 0.43 | 20.05 ± 4.43 | 0.84 ± 0.32 | <0.001 | 0.0232 | 0.2026 |
| Absorption (%) † | 73.28 ± 3.13 | 94.36 ± 0.80 | 74.60 ± 4.86 | 97.51 ± 0.92 | <0.001 | 0.0414 | 0.3879 |
| Urinary excretion (mg/day) | 6.92 ± 1.98 | 0.54 ± 0.15 | 9.44 ± 2.98 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.0179 | 0.0673 |
| Retention (%) ‡ | 65.63 ± 2.23 | 93.05 ± 1.84 | 62.62 ± 6.18 | 94.18 ± 3.80 | <0.001 | 0.5916 | 0.0753 |
| Magnesium | |||||||
| Intake (mg/day) | 6.35 ± 0.56 | 6.30 ± 0.75 | 6.46 ± 0.25 | 6.21 ± 0.43 | 0.1695 | 0.9289 | 0.2754 |
| Faecal excretion (mg/day) | 1.72 ± 0.37 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 1.48 ± 0.19 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | <0.001 | 0.0173 | 0.3777 |
| Absorption (%) † | 72.94 ± 5.06 | 93.28 ± 0.99 | 76.54 ± 1.50 | 95.21 ± 1.26 | <0.001 | 0.0078 | 0.3920 |
| Urinary excretion (mg/day) | 3.03 ± 0.24 | 3.11 ± 0.41 | 3.25 ± 0.28 | 3.27 ± 0.47 | 0.4112 | 0.0321 | 0.2432 |
| Retention (%) ‡ | 28.54 ± 8.57 | 43.84 ± 3.30 | 28.51 ± 4.04 | 43.68 ± 5.07 | <0.001 | 0.4611 | 0.7504 |
| Phosphorus | |||||||
| Intake (mg/day) | 35.26 ± 3.10 | 34.74 ± 4.13 | 35.44 ± 2.42 | 32.79 ± 2.35 | 0.1515 | 0.4407 | 0.3269 |
| Faecal excretion (mg/day) | 13.19 ± 1.54 | 4.68 ± 0.73 | 12.62 ± 1.83 | 4.57 ± 0.24 | <0.001 | 0.0517 | 0.9248 |
| Absorption (%) † | 62.66 ± 2.79 | 86.42 ± 2.25 | 63.23 ± 1.05 | 88.90 ± 3.48 | <0.001 | 0.0994 | 0.2963 |
| Urinary excretion (mg/day) | 0.37 ± 0.07 | 9.37 ± 1.39 | 0.37 ± 0.15 | 8.91 ± 0.74 | <0.001 | 0.2644 | 0.2606 |
| Retention (%) ‡ | 61.60 ± 2.79 | 60.21 ± 3.01 | 63.62 ± 4.13 | 62.30 ± 8.00 | 0.0927 | 0.0314 | 0.7850 |
* Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. O, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content and inulin. † Absorption: [(Intake—Faecal excretion)/Intake] × 100. ‡ Retention: [(Intake—Faecal excretion-Urinary excretion)/Intake] × 100. a,b,c Mean values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The differences between groups O, R, OI and RI are indicated with superscripts only when Ca × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Plasma calcium and phosphorus concentration in rats fed experimental GFDs *.
| Diets | Ca Effect | Inulin Effect | Ca × I | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | R | OI | RI | ||||
| Calcium (mM/L) | 2.522 ± 0.084 | 2.337 ± 0.059 | 2.545 ± 0.204 | 2.537 ± 0.238 | 0.1083 | 0.0662 | 0.1393 |
| Phosphorus (mM/L) | 1.861 ± 0.247 b | 2.202 ± 0.166 a | 1.835 ± 0.211 b | 2.670 ± 0.215 a | <0.001 | 0.0063 | 0.0026 |
| Ca:P | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | <0.001 | 0.3116 | 0.1177 |
* Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. O, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content; R, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content; OI, group fed a GF diet with the recommended calcium content and inulin; RI, group fed a GF diet with restricted calcium content and inulin. a,b,c Mean values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The differences between groups O, R, OI and RI are indicated with superscripts only when Ca × I interactions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).