Literature DB >> 28684107

Relative sensitivity of Arctic species to physically and chemically dispersed oil determined from three hydrocarbon measures of aquatic toxicity.

Adriana C Bejarano1, William W Gardiner2, Mace G Barron3, Jack Q Word4.   

Abstract

The risks to Arctic species from oil releases is a global concern, but their sensitivity to chemically dispersed oil has not been assessed using a curated and standardized dataset from spiked declining tests. Species sensitivity to dispersed oil was determined by their position within species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) using three measures of hydrocarbon toxicity: total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), and naphthalenes. Comparisons of SSDs with Arctic/sub-Arctic versus non-Arctic species, and across SSDs of compositionally similar oils, showed that Arctic and non-Arctic species have comparable sensitivities even with the variability introduced by combining data across studies and oils. Regardless of hydrocarbon measure, hazard concentrations across SSDs were protective of sensitive Arctic species. While the sensitivities of Arctic species to oil exposures resemble those of commonly tested species, PAH-based toxicity data are needed for a greater species diversity including sensitive Arctic species.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute toxicity; Arctic; Chemical dispersant; Oil products; Species sensitivity; Spiked declining exposures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28684107      PMCID: PMC6033333          DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  28 in total

1.  Toxicity data for modeling impacts of oil components in an Arctic ecosystem.

Authors:  G H Olsen; C Klok; A J Hendriks; P Geraudie; L De Hoop; F De Laender; E Farmen; B E Grøsvik; B H Hansen; M Hjorth; C R Jansen; T Nordtug; E Ravagnan; K Viaene; J Carroll
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.130

2.  Comparison of produced water toxicity to Arctic and temperate species.

Authors:  L Camus; S Brooks; P Geraudie; M Hjorth; J Nahrgang; G H Olsen; M G D Smit
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Effects of Dispersant Treatment on the Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Development of short, acute exposure hazard estimates: a tool for assessing the effects of chemical spills in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Adriana C Bejarano; James K Farr
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Arctic versus temperate comparison of risk assessment metrics for 2-methyl-naphthalene.

Authors:  Gro Harlaug Olsen; Mathijs G D Smit; Jolynn Carroll; Iris Jæger; Tim Smith; Lionel Camus
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.130

6.  Biodegradability of dispersed crude oil at two different temperatures.

Authors:  A D Venosa; E L Holder
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Biological and chemical factors of importance in the bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of persistent organochlorine contaminants in Arctic marine food webs.

Authors:  Katrine Borgå; Aaron T Fisk; Paul E Hoekstra; Derek C G Muir
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Potential for photoenhanced toxicity of spilled oil in Prince William Sound and Gulf of Alaska waters.

Authors:  M G Barron; L Ka'aihue
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2001 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 5.553

9.  Effects of dispersed oil on reproduction in the cold water copepod Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus).

Authors:  Anders Johny Olsen; Trond Nordtug; Dag Altin; Morten Lervik; Bjørn Henrik Hansen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  The acute toxicity of chemically and physically dispersed crude oil to key Arctic species under Arctic conditions during the open water season.

Authors:  William W Gardiner; Jack Q Word; Jack D Word; Robert A Perkins; Kelly M McFarlin; Brian W Hester; Lucinda S Word; Collin M Ray
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  5 in total

1.  Toxicity of oil spill response agents and crude oils to five aquatic test species.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Adriana C Bejarano; Robyn N Conmy; Devi Sundaravadivelu; Peter Meyer
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Long-Term Ecological Impacts from Oil Spills: Comparison of Exxon Valdez, Hebei Spirit, and Deepwater Horizon.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Deborah N Vivian; Ron A Heintz; Un Hyuk Yim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Toxicity of Cold Lake Blend and Western Canadian Select dilbits to standard aquatic test species.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Robyn N Conmy; Edith L Holder; Peter Meyer; Gregory J Wilson; Vanessa E Principe; Morgan M Willming
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Oil spill response capabilities and technologies for ice-covered Arctic marine waters: A review of recent developments and established practices.

Authors:  Jeremy Wilkinson; C J Beegle-Krause; Karl-Ulrich Evers; Nick Hughes; Alun Lewis; Mark Reed; Peter Wadhams
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  A Critical Review of the Availability, Reliability, and Ecological Relevance of Arctic Species Toxicity Tests for Use in Environmental Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Eldridge; Benjamin P de Jourdan; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.