| Literature DB >> 28683807 |
Tian-Tian Zhang1, Jin-Cheng Zhang2, Xue-Jiao Cui1, Jing-Jing Zheng1, Ru Li1, Fang Wang1, Jing-Ze Liu3, Yong-Hong Hu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Haemaphysalis longicornis is a blood-sucking ectoparasite that can cause diseases by transmitting some pathogens to humans and animals. Paramyosin (Pmy) is an immunomodulatory protein, which plays an important role in immune reactions against parasites. In this study, we evaluated the immune protection elicited by recombinant plasmids encoding H. longicornis Pmy in rabbits.Entities:
Keywords: DNA vaccine; Haemaphysalis longicornis; Immune protection; Pmy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28683807 PMCID: PMC5501075 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2262-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Antibody responses from immunized rabbits with DNA vaccine. Sera (2/group) were collected every seven days and determined by ELISA. The experiment was repeated three times. Results are shown as means ± SEM, and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05). The arrows indicate the days of the initial vaccination and the two boosters
Fig. 2Different biological parameters of female ticks from rabbits tests. a Average mortality of female adults. b Average engorgement weight of female adults. c Average ovipositions of female adults. d Average hatchability. In total, 240 female adult ticks (n = 240) in Fig. 2a were used in each group, while biting ticks (n = 202 or 174) in Fig. 2b-d were used in control group and pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy group, respectively. Results are shown as means ± SEM and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05)
Data from rabbits tests evaluating Pmy DNA for efficacy as anti-H. longicornis vaccine
| Group | No. of animals | Total no. of ticks | Total no. of biting ticks | Mortality (%) | Feeding time (day) | Engorgement weight/female (mg) | Ovipositions/female (mg) | Hatchability (%) | NET | EWPF | H | Eff (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | 240 | 202 | 15.63 ± 0.71 | 7.44 ± 0.08 | 170.20 ± 4.00 | 78.77 ± 4.96 | 79.93 ± 4.50 | – | – | – | – |
| pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy | 6 | 240 | 174 | 27.31 ± 0.46* | 7.50 ± 0.06 | 109.61 ± 4.24* | 48.39 ± 4.06* | 76.02 ± 3.58 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.95 | 50 |
NET = Reduction in tick numbers = Total number of biting ticks from the pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy group / Total number of biting ticks from the control group
EWPF = Reduction in weight of eggs per female = The average eggs weight of female adult from the pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy group/ The average eggs weight of female adult from the control group
H = Reduction in hatchability = Hatchability from pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy group / Hatchability from control group
Eff = Overall efficacy compared to control = 100 [1-(NET × EWPF × H)]
* P < 0.0001
Fig. 3Comparison of tick size between two groups. a Control group (body width: 7.00 ± 0.38 mm), b Immunization group with pcDNA3.1(+)-Pmy (body width: 4.83 ± 0.23 mm). Female ticks were attached to immunized rabbits for blood-feeding until complete engorgement. Results are shown as means ± SEM