Literature DB >> 28683468

Correlation between circulating mutant DNA and metabolic tumour burden in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Anne Winther-Larsen1, Christina Demuth1, Joan Fledelius2, Anne Tranberg Madsen1, Karin Hjorthaug3, Peter Meldgaard4, Boe Sandahl Sorensen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mutated circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been suggested as a surrogate marker of tumour burden and aggressiveness of disease. We examined the association between the level of plasma mutant cfDNA and metabolic tumour burden (MTB) measured by 18F-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Furthermore, the presence of mutant cfDNA was correlated with patient survival.
METHODS: Forty-six advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were included. At the time of inclusion, blood sampling and a PET/CT scan were performed. cfDNA was isolated and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed (Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer panel v2). MTB was defined by a volumetric PET parameter.
RESULTS: NGS succeeded in 41 patients. Mutations were detected in the blood of 24 patients. A significant correlation between the allele frequency of the most frequent mutation and MTB was found (P=0.001). Patients with detectable mutated cfDNA had a significantly shorter median overall survival compared with patients without (3.7 versus 10.6 months, P=0.019). This impact on survival was independent of the MTB.
CONCLUSIONS: Level of mutated cfDNA tends to correlate with MTB in advanced-stage NSCLC patients. Patients with detectable mutant DNA in plasma had an inferior survival, indicating that this could be an important predictor of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28683468      PMCID: PMC5572172          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is small DNA fragments circulating in the blood stream (Jahr ). Elevated levels of cfDNA have been identified in cancer patients compared with healthy individuals (Leon ). This elevation is believed to origin from both malignant tumour cells as well as from non-malignant cells constituting the tumour microenviroment (Mouliere and Thierry, 2012; Thierry ). The precise mechanism for release of the DNA into the blood stream is not fully elucidated. It has been demonstrated that the amount of DNA in the circulation increases when cells are undergoing apoptosis or necrosis (Jahr ). Other alternative mechanisms such as active secretion from tumour cells (Schwarzenbach ) and release from circulating tumour cells (Bettegowda ) have been suggested and may contribute to the total cfDNA level. In the recent years, it has been revealed that the contribution of cfDNA origin from tumour cells can be identified in the total cfDNA level by measuring cancer-specific mutations in the cfDNA also known to be present in the original tumour (Wan ). It has been proposed that the level of mutated cfDNA correlates with tumour burden. The level of tumour necrosis is thought to increase when tumour cells are rapidly proliferating as enlarging tumours are more likely to outgrow their blood supply (Leek ). This causes tumour areas that are poorly vascularised and ischaemic, and if this ischaemia is sustained, ultimately necrosis will develop. As these necrotic areas are believed to release tumour DNA into the circulation, the amount of mutated cfDNA could be related to tumour burden (Diehl ). Previous studies have supported this hypothesis by showing increased mutated cfDNA levels in advanced-stage patients compared with early-stage patients (Fleischhacker and Schmidt, 2007; Bettegowda ; Newman ). Moreover, correlations have been identified between changes in the amount of mutated cfDNA and changes in treatment response (Dawson ; Newman ; Sorensen ) as well as relapse of disease (Tie ). In addition to tumour volume, tumour aggressiveness may also be an important factor affecting the level of mutated cfDNA. An association between increasing necrosis grade and higher tumour grade has been identified, indicating that the amount of mutated cfDNA is associated with an aggressive tumour phenotype (Leek ). 18F-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established nuclear imaging modality for use in cancer patients. 18F-FDG is a radiolabelled glucose analogue accumulating in tissue with high glucose utilisation. FDG activity thereby reflects the metabolic activity and aggressiveness of a tumour. In addition, data on tumour volume can be assessed on an 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan. New volume-based PET parameters, as tumour lesion glycolysis (TLG), have been introduced capable of measuring the entire metabolic tumour burden (MTB) by incorporating both metabolic activity and volumetric data on all tumours in the patient (Larson ). Thus TLG assessment on an 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan reflects both tumour burden and, to some extent, tumour aggressiveness of the disease and could be a more informative parameter for assessing the total active tumour burden in patients than tumour burden assessment on a CT scan. Identification of oncogenic alterations in cfDNA is challenging due to the low concentration of target cfDNA in plasma. With the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it has become possible to assess a large amount of different mutations from a low input of DNA. NGS-based targeted panels directed against the most frequent alterations in cancer have been designed. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a 22-gene NGS panel has been developed, which includes the most frequent mutations in NSCLC (Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Panel v2). This panel has proven useful for mutation detection in plasma cfDNA (Frenel ; Zonta ). In the present study, we evaluated the correlation between the amount of mutated cfDNA in plasma, and the MTB was measured by TLG in advanced-stage NSCLC patients. Moreover, we evaluated whether the presence of mutated cfDNA was correlated with patient survival.

Materials and methods

Patients

In this retrospective study, advanced-stage NSCLC patients prospectively enrolled in a single-centre study from April 2013 to August 2015 at the Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark were evaluated. Details on inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described previously (Winther-Larsen ). At the time of inclusion, patients underwent an 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan and a blood sample was drawn. All patients were treated with erlotinib in a palliative setting. Testing for somatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations had been performed on the diagnostic tumour biopsy in all adenocarcinoma patients as part of the routine diagnostic work-up (see Supplementary S1). For the purpose of this study, we included only patients from the total cohort who were EGFR mutation wild type (wt), had progression on first or second line of chemotherapy, and in whom both an 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan and a blood sample were available and evaluable. Selection of patients is illustrated in Supplementary S2. All patients gave informed written consent before inclusion and the study was approved by the Central Denmark Region Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics (no. 1-10-72-19-12). The study was reported to ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02043002).

18F-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

All 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were performed on a combined PET/CT scanner (Siemens Biograph TruePoint 40, Siemens Healthcare GMbH, Erlangen, Germany) at the Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The imaging protocol is described in Supplementary S1. Same scanner model, protocol for acquisition, and reconstruction software was used for all patients. An experienced nuclear medicine physician blinded to the patient outcome analysed all PET/CT scans using the Siemens Syngo.via software, Siemens Healthcare GMbH. In all scans, TLG was calculated for all evaluable lesions according to the Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.0 guideline (Wahl ) (described in Supplementary S1 and illustrated in Supplementary S3). The sum of TLG for all evaluable lesions was defined as the MTB.

DNA extraction from blood

A peripheral blood sample of 10 ml was collected in an EDTA-containing tube for each patient. Within 2 h of withdrawal, samples were centrifuged (1400 g for 15 min) and plasma was isolated from the peripheral blood cells. Plasma was subsequently frozen at −80 °C until further analysis. cfDNA was purified from 2 ml of plasma by use of the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and eluted in a volume of 100 μl TE buffer. The amount of cfDNA was quantified by measuring the beta-2-microglobulin gene by droplet digital PCR (Pallisgaard ) as described in Supplementary S1.

Next-generation sequencing

NGS was carried out on all cfDNA samples. The Oncomine Solid Tumor DNA Kit was used to prepare libraries on 1.1–10 ng of cfDNA following the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). NGS was conducted using the Ion Chef Instrument and the Ion Personal Genome Machine (PGM) System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing was performed using Ion 316 v2 BC chips containing eight cfDNA samples per chip. Primary data processing was carried out using the Torrent Suite Software (version 5.0.4) on a Torrent Server and the Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer panel v2 template (all Thermo Fisher Scientific). Variant calling was performed using the Ion Reporter Software (version 5.0) and the AmpliSeq CHPv2 peripheral/CTC/CF DNA single sample workflow (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Default settings were used except from the reference and hotspot BED files, which were supplied in the kit. Sequencing was considered successful if the mean sequencing depth was ⩾2000. If this criterion could not be met, the sample was disqualified. Called variants were only accepted if the allele frequency (AF) was ⩾1%. The Integrative Genomics Viewer (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used for visualisation of variants (Thorvaldsdóttir ).

Statistical analysis

Correlations between detection of mutated cfDNA and clinical characteristics were calculated using χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to calculate the correlation between the presence of mutated cfDNA and the levels of TLG and total cfDNA. Correlation between TLG and concentration of mutated cfDNA was evaluated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient after log-transformation of both variables. Follow-up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan–Meier method. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the start of enrolment until death of any cause or last follow-up date (19 April 2016). If patients were still alive on the last follow-up date, they were censored at that day. Estimates of median OS were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Clinical variables were dichotomised except for age (continuous). All tests were two-sided, and P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics version 20.0 for windows (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). STATA version 13 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was used for preparation of Kaplan–Meier curve and GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for preparation of scatter plot.

Results

A total of 46 patients were analysed. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients had stage IV disease except for three patients with stage III disease. The majority of patients had progression on first-line chemotherapy. No patients were lost to follow-up. The median time interval between blood sampling and PET/CT scanning was 2 days (range: 0–9 days). After a median follow-up time of 20.9 months (95% CI: 11.2–30.6 month), five patients were still alive. The median OS in all patients was 5.9 months (95% CI: 2.9–8.9 months).
Table 1

Patient and tumour characteristics (N=46)

CharacteristicsN (%)
Age
Median years (range)67 (48–81)
Gender
Female20 (43)
Male26 (57)
Performance status, ECOG
0–138 (83)
28 (17)
Smoking status
Never or formera33 (72)
Current12 (26)
Unknown1 (2)
Stage
III3 (7)
IV43 (93)
Histology
Adenocarcinoma38 (83)
Squamous cell carcinoma8 (17)
Progression on
First-line chemotherapy37 (80)
Second-line chemotherapy9 (20)
Prior treatment
First line 
  Carboplatin/vinorelbineb26 (56)
  Carboplatin/vinorelbine/bevacizumabc20 (44)
Second line 
  Pemetrexed5 (56)
  Docetaxel4 (44)

Abbreviation: ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Former smoker was defined as having stopped smoking at the time of diagnosis.

Carboplatin day 1 (AUC 5) and vinorelbine day 1 and day 8 (60–80 mg m−2 (p.o.)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles.

Bevacizumab (7.5 mg m−2 i.v. day 1) was given in combination with chemotherapy. Patients with disease control received subsequent maintenance therapy every 3 weeks until progression or toxicity.

Correlation between the level of mutated cfDNA and MTB

cfDNA isolation was successful in all patients and a median value of 4587 copies ml−1 (range: 297–170 720 copies ml−1) was measured. Sequencing of cfDNA succeeded in 41 out of 46 patients (89%). A least one mutation was detected in 24 patients (59%). The number of identified mutations in each patient ranged from 1 to 4 with a median of 1 mutation. In total, 43 mutations were identified. The most frequently mutated genes were: TP53 (18 patients), KRAS (12 patients), and EGFR (2 patients; Table 2). The median AF of the most frequent mutation in each patient was 2.7% (range: 1.1–62.5%).
Table 2

Mutations identified in circulating cell-free DNA by use of next-generation sequencing (N=24)

IDGeneCodingProteinCoverageMutation allele coverageAllele frequency (%)COSMIC
4TP53c.833C>Gp.Pro278Arg1536271.76COSM10887
6KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser3201401.25COSM517
9TP53c.714_715insTp.Asn239Ter57343395.91COSM45870
 KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser3387862.54COSM517
10TP53c.313G>Tp.Gly105Cys2800321.14COSM44481
12KRASc.34G>Tp.Gly12Cys3084662.14COSM516
14SMAD4c.1051G>Ap.Asp351Asn455461213.44COSM32910
 TP53c.313G>Tp.Gly105Cys275034312.47COSM44481
 KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser30031535.09COSM517
15STK11c.766G>Tp.Glu256Ter61641682.73COSM5731897
 TP53c.799C>Tp.Arg267Trp3961822.07COSM11183
21KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser8580191322.30COSM517
 KRASc.35G>Ap.Gly12Asp66664266.39COSM521
 TP53c.478A>Gp.Met160Val53631051.96COSM44328
 TP53c.491A>Cp.Lys164Thr5420951.75COSM44387
23KRASc.34_35delGGinsTTp.Gly12Phe3432451.31COSM512
26METc.3029C>Tp.Thr1010Ile5643199435.34COSM707
 TP53c.578A>Gp.His193Arg267466224.76COSM10742
29TP53c.641A>Gp.His214Arg4574121426.54COSM43687
 EGFRc.2235_2249delGGAATTAAGAGAAGCp.Glu746_Ala750del41491403.37COSM6223
 EGFRc.2240T>Cp.Leu747Ser4178601.44COSM26704
30TP53c.730G>Tp.Gly244Cys56933936.90COSM11524
34KRASc.34G>Tp.Gly12Cys1517513.36COSM516
 TP53c.716A>Gp.Asn239Ser45391122.47COSM44094
 ERBB4c.512G>Tp.Trp171Leu2605612.34COSM5369807
35TP53c.711G>Ap.Met237Ile4353601.38COSM10834
36TP53c.404G>Ap.Cys135Tyr2745171662.51COSM10801
 PIK3CAc.1624G>Cp.Glu542Gln9973225022.56COSM17442
37TP53c.743G>Ap.Arg248Gln82211291.57COSM10662
38KRASc.34G>Tp.Gly12Cys3081401.30COSM516
40TP53c.742C>Tp.Arg248Trp70062563.65COSM10656
 KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser3743711.90COSM517
 TP53c.578A>Gp.His193Arg4570601.31COSM10742
 TP53c.830G>Tp.Cys277Phe3210371.15COSM10749
44TP53c.469G>Tp.Val157Phe3714481.29COSM10670
45KRASc.34G>Tp.Gly12Cys20201004.95COSM516
 TP53c.747G>Tp.Arg249Ser61031211.98COSM10817
49EGFRc.2234_2245delAGGAATTAAGAGp.Glu746_Ala750del6360911.43COSM6223
51KRASc.34G>Tp.Gly12Cys4237461.09COSM516
54KRASc.34G>Ap.Gly12Ser3214862.68COSM517
 TP53c.488A>Gp.Tyr163Cys2946501.70COSM10808
 KRASc.47A>Gp.Lys16Arg3208471.47COSM1163765
64TP53c.844C>Gp.Arg282Gly1814532.92COSM10992

Abbreviation: COSMIC=Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer.

TLG was assessable in all FDG-PET/CT. A significant correlation between the AF of the most frequent mutation (%) and the level of TLG was found as shown in Figure 1 (r=0.628, P=0.001). By contrast, no significant correlation could be identified between MTB and the number of mutations identified in each patient (data not shown).
Figure 1

Scatter plot showing the correlation between the allele frequency of the most frequent mutation and the level of TLG in patients with circulating mutated cell-free DNA present in plasma ( The P-value was calculated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Evaluation of patients with and without detectable mutated cfDNA

No mutations could be identified in the cfDNA of 17 patients. A comparison of clinical and tumour characteristics between the mutated cfDNA-positive and the mutated cfDNA-negative group was performed, and no significant differences were identified (Supplementary S4). In addition, no significant difference in the level of total cfDNA was found between the mutated cfDNA-positive (5170 copies ml−1, range 1518–170 720) and the mutated cfDNA-negative (4510 copies ml−1, range 1232–39 160) patients (χ2 (2)=0.018, P=0.895). However, a significant higher median MTB was found in the mutated cfDNA-positive patients (689 (range 73–7034)) compared with the mutated cfDNA-negative patients (269 (range 67–3958)) (P=0.047). When evaluating OS, patients with mutated cfDNA presence in the blood had a significant shorter median OS (3.7 months (95% CI: 0.0–7.6)) compared with mutated cfDNA-negative patients (10.6 months (95% CI: 7.1–14.1), P=0.019; Figure 2). In a univariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of mutated cfDNA together with high level of MTB was found to be associated with decreased OS (Table 3). To evaluate the independent impact of the presence of mutated cfDNA on survival, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. Being mutated cfDNA positive remained an independent predictor of shorter OS with an adjusted HR of 2.11 (95% CI: 1.02–4.38) (Table 3).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival (OS) according to the presence or absence of circulating mutated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. A median OS of 3.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 0–7.6 months) was found in patients with detectable mutated cfDNA, while a median OS of 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.4–16.9 months) was found in patients without detectable mutated cfDNA. The difference between the groups was calculated using the log-rank test.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival (N=46)

VariablesHR (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted HR (95% CI)P-value
Age
Continuous0.99 (0.95–1.04)0.690  
Gender
Female0.84 (0.41–1.74)0.842  
Male1.00   
Histology
Adenocarcinoma0.36 (0.12–1.10)0.073  
Squamous cell1.00   
Smoking
Never or former1.37 (0.68–3.01)0.400  
Current1.00   
Performance status, ECOG
0–10.60 (0.20–1.74)0.344  
21.00   
Stage
IV0.51 (0.15–1.76)0.287  
III1.00   
Erlotinib treatment
Second line0.69 (0.27–1.75)0.432  
Third line1.00   
Presence of mutated cfDNA
Mutated cfDNA positive2.26 (1.13–4.55)0.0222.11 (1.02–4.38)0.044
Mutated cfDNA negative1.00 1.00 
TLGa
>4202.80 (1.41–5.55)0.0033.08 (1.46–6.47)0.003
⩽4201.00 1.00 

Abbreviations: cfDNA=cell-free DNA; CI=confidence interval; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR=hazard ratio; TLG=tumour lesion glycolysis.

Divided by the median value.

No difference in OS was found between mutated cfDNA-positive patients, with only one mutation identified compared with a higher number of mutations (P=0.355). Neither was any difference in survival found between mutated cfDNA-positive patients with an AF above or below the median 2.7% (P=0.949).

Discussion

Our study shows a significant correlation between the frequency of mutated cfDNA and the MTB measured by PET/CT in advanced-stage NSCLC patients. The study thereby supports the hypothesis of mutated cfDNA as a surrogate marker of tumour burden and tumour aggressiveness. In addition, we observed that mutated cfDNA-positive patients had a higher median MTB than patients without mutated cfDNA present in plasma and could confirm from previous reports showing that mutated cfDNA positivity is correlated to an inferior survival. To our knowledge, only one previous study has, similar to ours, compared the exact level of mutated cfDNA with radiological tumour burden in NSCLC patients. Newman ) evaluated the correlation between amount of mutated cfDNA and tumour volume, defined as visible tumour on a CT scan, in nine newly diagnosed or recurrent NSCLC patients with different stages (I–IV). In line with ours, they found a significant correlation. In a study by Pécuchet ), the concentration of mutated cfDNA found in 75 advanced-stage NSCLC patients was divided in tertiles and correlated to the tumour burden defined as the sum of the RECIST target lesions. A significant higher median tumour burden was found in the groups with high and intermediate concentration of mutated cfDNA compared with the low group. In addition, there was also a significantly higher median tumour burden when comparing the group with high concentration of mutated cfDNA to the group with intermediate concentration. Both of these studies used a CT-defined tumour volume and no measurement of tumour aggressiveness was therefore incorporated. In contrast, we measured the MTB by use of the PET parameter TLG. This parameter not only measures the entire tumour burden by incorporating all measurable tumours in the patient (and not only RECIST target lesions) but also integrates the metabolic activity of each tumour. Thereby, the parameter becomes a measurement of both tumour burden and aggressiveness of the tumour. MTB has previously been used for assessment of tumour burden in a study evaluating the correlation between tumour burden and total amount of total cfDNA in 53 advanced NSCLC patients (Nygaard ). No correlation could be found in this study indicating that total cfDNA is a more unspecific marker of tumour burden than mutated cfDNA. The majority of cfDNA originates from non-malignant tissue. Hence, the total amount of cfDNA not simply reflects tumour burden and tumour aggressiveness but rather reflect much more complicated biological mechanisms yet not fully understood. Additionally, we found that patients with detectable mutated cfDNA in plasma had an inferior median survival compared with patients without mutated cfDNA present in plasma. A prognostic value of mutated cfDNA has previously been evaluated in several types of cancers, such as colorectal (Lecomte ), breast (Dawson ; Bettegowda ), pancreatic (Hadano ), and gastric (Gao ). In NSCLC patients, a study of EGFR mutation-positive patients treated in the EURTAC trail found that the subgroup of L858R-positive patients with detectable mutations in plasma had a significant shorter OS as compared with L858R-positive patients with no plasma mutations, also supporting our finding (Karachaliou ). However, the importance of mutated cfDNA positivity in EGFR mutation wt patients is less investigated. A recent study performed NGS of cfDNA and tumour samples in 105 unselected advanced NSCLC patients using the same NGS panel as used in the present study (Pécuchet ). Mutations in cfDNA were identified in 71% of patients and a significantly reduced OS was seen in the mutated cfDNA-positive patients. Though, 43% of the patients harboured an EGFR mutation either in the tumour or in the cfDNA making the patient cohort heterogeneous. In our cohort, all patients had tumours that were EGFR wt and only 2 patients (2%) showed EGFR mutations in plasma. Owing to the homogenous nature of our cohort, we could show that mutated cfDNA positivity is a valuable tool for predicting survival in advanced EGFR mutation wt patients. The prognostic value of mutated cfDNA positivity could in theory be explained by the close correlation to tumour burden. However, we found that the impact of mutated cfDNA on survival was independent of the MTB in the multivariate analysis, indicating that mutated cfDNA positivity is an independent marker of survival. Our study is the first of its kind and strengthened by the prospective nature of the original study allowing the PET scanning and the blood sampling to be performed in very close proximity to each other. The same PET scanner model, protocol for acquisition, and reconstruction software was used for all patients, thereby reducing the possible interindividual variability of the scans. Additionally, we had a homogeneous patient cohort receiving the same treatment and with complete clinical data in all patients. On the other hand, our study had some limitations to consider. Even though our study is the largest in the field, the number of patients is limited and our results are primarily hypothesis generating. Furthermore, we performed a targeted sequencing using a 22-gene panel with the risk that rare lung cancer mutations would not be detected. As we used the AF for quantification of mutated DNA, a possibility exist that a mutation could have been rejected (if the AF<1%) owing to a high amount of non-mutated cfDNA in the sample. Finally, we chose to define the most frequently mutation as the mutation defining the level of mutated cfDNA. This may underestimate the true level, but it would be more problematic to combine the frequency of different mutation types as it is not possible to determine whether different mutations exist in the same clone or arise from several different clones contributing their individual mutations. In conclusion, we showed for the first time that a correlation exists between the level of mutated cfDNA and MTB in EGFR mutation wt NSCLC patients with advanced-stage disease. This indicates that mutated plasma cfDNA can be used as an indirect measure of tumour biology. Furthermore, we observed an inferior survival in patients with mutated cfDNA present in plasma compared with patients without. This correlation was independent of tumour burden and, if further validated, mutated cfDNA positivity could be a valuable tool for prediction of survival in patients with advanced NSCLC in future.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Dave S B Hoon; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells.

Authors:  S Jahr; H Hentze; S Englisch; D Hardt; F O Fackelmayer; R D Hesch; R Knippers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Frank Diehl; Meng Li; Devin Dressman; Yiping He; Dong Shen; Steve Szabo; Luis A Diaz; Steven N Goodman; Kerstin A David; Hartmut Juhl; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer--a survey.

Authors:  M Fleischhacker; B Schmidt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-10-07

5.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

6.  Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies.

Authors:  Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration.

Authors:  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; James T Robinson; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Multiplex Detection of Rare Mutations by Picoliter Droplet Based Digital PCR: Sensitivity and Specificity Considerations.

Authors:  Eleonora Zonta; Fanny Garlan; Nicolas Pécuchet; Karla Perez-Toralla; Ouriel Caen; Coren Milbury; Audrey Didelot; Elizabeth Fabre; Hélène Blons; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Valérie Taly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunhe Gao; Kecheng Zhang; Hongqing Xi; Aizhen Cai; Xiaosong Wu; Jianxin Cui; Jiyang Li; Zhi Qiao; Bo Wei; Lin Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-24
View more
  17 in total

1.  Molecular imaging and molecular diagnostics: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Gregor Hoermann; Lukas Kenner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cell-free DNA concentration and fragment size fraction correlate with FDG PET/CT-derived parameters in NSCLC patients.

Authors:  J M González de Aledo-Castillo; S Casanueva-Eliceiry; A Soler-Perromat; D Fuster; V Pastor; N Reguart; N Viñolas; R Reyes; I Vollmer; P Paredes; J A Puig-Butillé
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Combination of Circulating Tumour DNA and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Precision Monitoring of Therapy Response in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ondrej Fiala; Jan Baxa; Martin Svaton; Lucie Benesova; Renata Ptackova; Tereza Halkova; Marek Minarik; Petr Hosek; Marcela Buresova; Jindrich Finek; Jiri Ferda; Milos Pesek
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 4.  Use of Liquid Biopsy in the Care of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Atocha Romero; Roberto Serna-Blasco; Virginia Calvo; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 5.  The Validity and Predictive Value of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Prediction of Response in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Frederik van Delft; Hendrik Koffijberg; Valesca Retèl; Michel van den Heuvel; Maarten IJzerman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  A method for treatment monitoring using circulating tumour DNA in cancer patients without targetable mutations.

Authors:  Christina Demuth; Anne Winther-Larsen; Anne Tranberg Madsen; Peter Meldgaard; Boe Sandahl Sorensen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-07-24

7.  Correlation between circulating tumour DNA and metabolic tumour burden in metastatic melanoma patients.

Authors:  Ashleigh C McEvoy; Lydia Warburton; Zeyad Al-Ogaili; Liesl Celliers; Leslie Calapre; Michelle R Pereira; Muhammad A Khattak; Tarek M Meniawy; Michael Millward; Melanie Ziman; Elin S Gray
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  The interplay of circulating tumor DNA and chromatin modification, therapeutic resistance, and metastasis.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Yiyi Liang; Shifu Li; Fanyuan Zeng; Yongan Meng; Ziwei Chen; Shuang Liu; Yongguang Tao; Fenglei Yu
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  Prediction of tumor mutation burden in breast cancer based on the expression of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67.

Authors:  Junnan Xu; Xiangyu Guo; Mingxi Jing; Tao Sun
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA by Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Christina Demuth; Karen-Lise Garm Spindler; Julia S Johansen; Niels Pallisgaard; Dorte Nielsen; Estrid Hogdall; Benny Vittrup; Boe Sandahl Sorensen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.