Literature DB >> 28683231

Sound-Intensity Feedback During Running Reduces Loading Rates and Impact Peak.

Jeremiah J Tate, Clare E Milner.   

Abstract

Study Design Controlled laboratory study, within-session design. Background Gait retraining has been proposed as an effective intervention to reduce impact loading in runners at risk of stress fractures. Interventions that can be easily implemented in the clinic are needed. Objective To assess the immediate effects of sound-intensity feedback related to impact during running on vertical impact peak, peak vertical instantaneous loading rate, and vertical average loading rate. Methods Fourteen healthy, college-aged runners who ran at least 9.7 km/wk participated (4 male, 10 female; mean ± SD age, 23.7 ± 2.0 years; height, 1.67 ± 0.08 m; mass, 60.9 ± 8.7 kg). A decibel meter provided real-time sound-intensity feedback of treadmill running via an iPad application. Participants were asked to reduce the sound intensity of running while receiving continuous feedback for 15 minutes, while running at their self-selected preferred speed. Baseline and follow-up ground reaction force data were collected during overground running at participants' self-selected preferred running speed. Results Dependent t tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in vertical impact peak (1.56 BW to 1.13 BW, P≤.001), vertical instantaneous loading rate (95.48 BW/s to 62.79 BW/s, P = .001), and vertical average loading rate (69.09 BW/s to 43.91 BW/s, P≤.001) after gait retraining, compared to baseline. Conclusion The results of the current study support the use of sound-intensity feedback during treadmill running to immediately reduce loading rate and impact force. The transfer of within-session reductions in impact peak and loading rates to overground running was demonstrated. Decreases in loading were of comparable magnitude to those observed in other gait retraining methods. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(8):565-569. Epub 6 Jul 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7275.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback; rehabilitation; running

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28683231     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running.

Authors:  Ivan Pui Hung Au; Leo Ng; Paul Davey; Marco So; Brian Chan; Pinky Li; Will Wong; Tania Althorpe; Sarah Michelle Stearne; Roy Cheung
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  ALTERING CADENCE OR VERTICAL OSCILLATION DURING RUNNING: EFFECTS ON RUNNING RELATED INJURY FACTORS.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; Federico Pozzi; Richard W Willy; Anthony Carrol; Joseph Zeni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

4.  Vertical Loading Rate Is Not Associated with Running Injury, Regardless of Calculation Method.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schmida; Christa M Wille; Mikel R Stiffler-Joachim; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.