Literature DB >> 28681902

Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.

Renato Ambrósio, Bernardo T Lopes, Fernando Faria-Correia, Marcella Q Salomão, Jens Bühren, Cynthia J Roberts, Ahmed Elsheikh, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Vinciguerra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI), which combines Scheimpflugbased corneal tomography and biomechanics for enhancing ectasia detection.
METHODS: Patients from different continents were retrospectively studied. The normal group included 1 eye randomly selected from 480 patients with normal corneas and the keratoconus group included 1 eye randomly selected from 204 patients with keratoconus. There were two groups: 72 ectatic eyes with no surgery from 94 patients with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE-E group) and the fellow eyes of these patients with normal topography (VAE-NT group). Pentacam HR and Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) parameters were analyzed and combined using different artificial intelligence methods. The accuracies for detecting ectasia of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BAD-D) and Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) were compared to the TBI, considering the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs).
RESULTS: The random forest method with leave-one-out cross-validation (RF/LOOCV) provided the best artificial intelligence model. The AUROC for detecting ectasia (keratoconus, VAE-E, and VAE-NT groups) of the TBI was 0.996, which was statistically higher (DeLong et al., P < .001) than the BAD-D (0.956) and CBI (0.936). The TBI cut-off value of 0.79 provided 100% sensitivity for detecting clinical ectasia (keratoconus and VAE-E groups) with 100% specificity. The AUROCs for the TBI, BAD-D, and CBI were 0.985, 0.839, and 0.822 in the VAE-NT group (DeLong et al., P < .001). An optimized TBI cut-off value of 0.29 provided 90.4% sensitivity with 96% specificity in the VAE-NT group.
CONCLUSIONS: The TBI generated by the RF/LOOCV provided greater accuracy for detecting ectasia than other techniques. The TBI was sensitive for detecting subclinical (fruste) ectasia among eyes with normal topography in very asymmetric patients. The TBI may also confirm unilateral ectasia, potentially characterizing the inherent ectasia susceptibility of the cornea, which should be the subject of future studies. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434-443.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28681902     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  61 in total

1.  [Evaluation of corneal biomechanics in keratoconus using dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug measurements].

Authors:  S Brettl; P Franko Zeitz; T A Fuchsluger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview].

Authors:  R Herber; N Terai; K R Pillunat; F Raiskup; L E Pillunat; E Spörl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Assessment of corneal topographic, tomographic, densitometric, and biomechanical properties of Fabry patients with ocular manifestations.

Authors:  Veysel Cankurtaran; Kemal Tekin; Ayse Idil Cakmak; Merve Inanc; Faruk Hilmi Turgut
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis.

Authors:  Oren Golan; Andre L Piccinini; Eric S Hwang; Ildamaris Montes De Oca Gonzalez; Mark Krauthammer; Sumitra S Khandelwal; David Smadja; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Short and long term corneal biomechanical analysis after overnight orthokeratology.

Authors:  Amelia Nieto-Bona; Paloma Porras-Ángel; Adela Elena Ayllón-Gordillo; Gonzalo Carracedo; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Characterization of cone size and centre in keratoconic corneas.

Authors:  Ashkan Eliasy; Ahmed Abass; Bernardo T Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Haixia Zhang; Paolo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Cynthia J Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Corneal biomechanics: Measurement and structural correlations.

Authors:  Jillian Chong; William J Dupps
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 8.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Combined Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Crosslinking in Keratoconus Suspects.

Authors:  George Kymionis; George Kontadakis; Michael Grentzelos; Myrsini Petrelli
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Keratoconus detection of changes using deep learning of colour-coded maps.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Jiaxin Zhao; Katja C Iselin; Davide Borroni; Davide Romano; Akilesh Gokul; Charles N J McGhee; Yitian Zhao; Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Mohammed Ziaei; Stephen Kaye; Vito Romano; Yalin Zheng
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.