Literature DB >> 28681150

Predicting Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Protocols Based on Mathematical Model Choice for Proliferation Saturation Index.

Jan Poleszczuk1,2, Rachel Walker1, Eduardo G Moros3, Kujtim Latifi3, Jimmy J Caudell3, Heiko Enderling4,5.   

Abstract

Radiation is commonly used in cancer treatment. Over 50% of all cancer patients will undergo radiotherapy (RT) as part of cancer care. Scientific advances in RT have primarily focused on the physical characteristics of treatment including beam quality and delivery. Only recently have inroads been made into utilizing tumor biology and radiobiology to design more appropriate RT protocols. Tumors are composites of proliferating and growth-arrested cells, and overall response depends on their respective proportions at irradiation. Prokopiou et al. (Radiat Oncol 10:159, 2015) developed the concept of the proliferation saturation index (PSI) to augment the clinical decision process associated with RT. This framework is based on the application of the logistic equation to pre-treatment imaging data in order to estimate a patient-specific tumor carrying capacity, which is then used to recommend a specific RT protocol. It is unclear, however, how dependent clinical recommendations are on the underlying tumor growth law. We discuss a PSI framework with a generalized logistic equation that can capture kinetics of different well-known growth laws including logistic and Gompertzian growth. Estimation of model parameters on the basis of clinical data revealed that the generalized logistic model can describe data equally well for a wide range of the generalized logistic exponent value. Clinical recommendations based on the calculated PSI, however, are strongly dependent on the specific growth law assumed. Our analysis suggests that the PSI framework may best be utilized in clinical practice when the underlying tumor growth law is known, or when sufficiently many tumor growth models suggest similar fractionation protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generalized logistic equation; Proliferation saturation index; Radiation protocol

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28681150     DOI: 10.1007/s11538-017-0279-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  7 in total

1.  Proliferation saturation index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses.

Authors:  Enakshi D Sunassee; Dean Tan; Nathan Ji; Renee Brady; Eduardo G Moros; Jimmy J Caudell; Slav Yartsev; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Are all models wrong?

Authors:  Heiko Enderling; Olaf Wolkenhauer
Journal:  Comput Syst Oncol       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 3.  The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.

Authors:  Russell C Rockne; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Kristin R Swanson; James P Sluka; James A Glazier; Paul Macklin; David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; J Tinsley Oden; George Biros; Thomas E Yankeelov; Kit Curtius; Ibrahim Al Bakir; Dominik Wodarz; Natalia Komarova; Luis Aparicio; Mykola Bordyuh; Raul Rabadan; Stacey D Finley; Heiko Enderling; Jimmy Caudell; Eduardo G Moros; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Gatenby; Artem Kaznatcheev; Peter Jeavons; Nikhil Krishnan; Julia Pelesko; Raoul R Wadhwa; Nara Yoon; Daniel Nichol; Andriy Marusyk; Michael Hinczewski; Jacob G Scott
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.959

4.  The roles of T cell competition and stochastic extinction events in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Authors:  Gregory J Kimmel; Frederick L Locke; Philipp M Altrock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy and its impact on tumor interactions with the immune system.

Authors:  Rebecca Anne Bekker; Sungjune Kim; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.218

6.  The Optimal Radiation Dose to Induce Robust Systemic Anti-Tumor Immunity.

Authors:  Jan Poleszczuk; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Forecasting Individual Patient Response to Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer With a Dynamic Carrying Capacity Model.

Authors:  Mohammad U Zahid; Nuverah Mohsin; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jimmy J Caudell; Louis B Harrison; Clifton D Fuller; Eduardo G Moros; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 7.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.