| Literature DB >> 28678861 |
Ana C de Bragança1, Regina L M Moreau2, Thales de Brito3, Maria H M Shimizu4, Daniele Canale4, Denise A de Jesus4, Ana M G Silva3, Pedro H Gois1, Antonio C Seguro1, Antonio J Magaldi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ecstasy (Ec) use produces hyperthermia, excessive sweating, intense thirst, an inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and a multisystemic toxicity due to oxidative stress (OS). Intense thirst induces high intake of pure water, which associated with SIADH, usually develops into acute hyponatremia (Hn). As Hn is induced rapidly, experiments to check if Ec acted directly on the Inner Medullary Collecting Ducts (IMCD) of rats were conducted. Rhabdomyolysis and OS were also studied because Ec is known to induce Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and tissue damage. To decrease OS, the antioxidant inhibitors N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and Allopurinol (Allo) were used.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28678861 PMCID: PMC5497951 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Western-blot analysis of the water transporter.
Bands 29 and 35-50kDa from AQP2. * p< 0.05 Li x Li+Ec.
Values of optic densitometry.
| NKCC2 | ENaC | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 100.00±10.78 | 101.34±12.11 |
| Ec | 112.40±17.85 | 80.99±9.86 |
n = 5 for each groups; Cont vs Ec- NS for all groups
Values of TBARS and GSH.
| Cont | Ec | NAC+Ec | Ec+NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH | 2.7±0.16 | 1.89±0.10 | 3.04±0.12 | 2.52±0.40 |
| TBARS | 1.92±0.18 | 2.56±0.11 | 1.83±0.19 | 1.38±0.16 |
| n |
TBARS in nmol/ml; GSH in μmol/ml
*p < 0.001 vs Ec
+p < 0.001 vs Ec
**p < 0.05 vs Cont
Values of CK, Ur.Ac, Na+, K+, TBARS, GSH ant body temperature (T).
| CK | Ur.Ac. | Na+ | K+ | TBARS | GSH | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 382±70 | 1.5±0.30 | 143.0±0.02 | 4.1±0.10 | 0.60±0.10 | 2.16±0.08 | 36.8±0.10 |
| Ec | 1473±22 | 2.03±0.26 | 141.0±0.02 | 7.8±0.49 | 2.31±0.39 | 2.16±0.08 | 36.8±0.10 |
| Ec+NAC | 2355±48 | 2.80±0.06 | 139.3±2.5 | 8.60±0.10 | 0.89±0.10 | 1.55±0.10 | 39.4±1.05 |
| NAC+Ec | 2854±98 | 2.83±0.70 | 142.0±1.1 | 7.65±1.65 | 0.73±0.13 | 1.49±0.10 | 40.7±0.25 |
| Ec+Allo | 935±81 | 0.28±0.05 | 142.0±1.4 | 4.75±0.16 | 1.50±0.18 | 2.30±0.13 | 36.3±0.09 |
CK- U/L; K+ mEq/L; UrAc mg/dL; Temperature in C°
a p<0.01 vs Sham
*p<0.02 vs Ec
**p<0.05 vs Ec
+p<0.001 vs Ec; for Ec n = 7; for others n = 4; for sham n = 6
Fig 2Representative light micrographs of Hematoxylin-Eosin stain.
2a (Ec), 2b (Ec+NAC) and 2c (NAC+Ec) show areas of necrosis (*) and inflammatory infiltrations (macrophages)(arrows). 2d (Allo+Ec) shows no necrosis and slight inflammatory infiltration.