| Literature DB >> 28676786 |
Le Li1,2,3, Argyrios Stampas1,2, Henry Shin1,2, Xiaoyan Li1,2, Ping Zhou1,2,4.
Abstract
This study assessed electrical impedance myography (EIM) changes after spinal cord injury (SCI) with a localized multifrequency technology. The EIM measurement was performed on the biceps brachii muscle at rest condition of 17 cervical SCI subjects, and 23 neurologically intact subjects as control group. The results showed that there was a significant decrease in muscle reactance (X) and phase angle (θ) at selected frequencies (i.e., 50 and 100 kHz) in SCI compared to control. There was no significant difference in muscle resistance (R) between the two groups. The anisotropy examination revealed that SCI group had a decreased anisotropy ratio in resistance. In addition, the multifrequency spectrum analysis showed a decreased slope of the log(freq)-resistance regression in SCI group when compared to healthy control. Findings of the EIM changes are related to inherit muscle changes after the injury. Since EIM requires no patient effort and is quick and convenient to conduct, it may provide a useful tool for examination of paralyzed muscle changes after SCI.Entities:
Keywords: biceps brachii; electrical impedance myography; multifrequency; muscle; spinal cord injury
Year: 2017 PMID: 28676786 PMCID: PMC5476999 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Clinical characteristics of the spinal cord injury subjects enrolled in this study.
| Subject ID | Age | Gender | Years past injury | Neurological level | Motor level | ASIA impairment level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | Male | 3 | C5 | C5 | D |
| 2 | 49 | Female | 16 | C3 | C7 | C |
| 3 | 47 | Male | 10 | C5 | C5 | C |
| 4 | 50 | Male | 26 | C6 | C6 | D |
| 5 | 31 | Female | 1 | C4 | C7 | C |
| 6 | 38 | Female | 10 | C6 | C7 | B |
| 7 | 23 | Male | 9 | C3 | C3 | A |
| 8 | 51 | Male | 2 | C6 | C6 | C |
| 9 | 36 | Male | 16 | C2 | C2 | A |
| 10 | 29 | Male | 5 | C3 | C3 | D |
| 11 | 65 | Male | 2 | C2 | C2 | C |
| 12 | 60 | Male | 20 | C5 | C5 | A |
| 13 | 18 | Male | 4 | C2 | C2 | D |
| 14 | 36 | Male | 11 | C5 | C7 | A |
| 15 | 39 | Female | 10 | C4 | C7 | B |
| 16 | 31 | Male | 1 | C4 | C5 | B |
| 17 | 25 | Male | 2.5 | C4 | C7 | D |
| Total | Average years = 39.2 | 13M and 4F | Average years = 8.7 | |||
Figure 1Experiment setup (top) and probe configuration (bottom). I: current injecting electrode; V: voltage measuring electrode.
Figure 2Resistance (A), reactance (B), and phase angle (C) at three different frequencies (50, 100, and 200 kHz) at weaker and stronger sides of spinal cord injury (SCI) and dominant side of healthy control (mean ± SD, * indicates p < 0.05 between groups, # indicates p < 0.05 from different frequencies).
Figure 3Comparison of 50/200 kHz phase ratio among three groups (mean ± SD, * indicates p < 0.05 between groups). A typical trial of spinal cord injury (SCI) and healthy control in multifrequency of three parameters.
Figure 4Anisotropy of resistance (A), reactance (B), and phase angle (C) at three different frequencies (50, 100, and 200 kHz) at weaker and stronger sides of spinal cord injury (SCI) and dominant side of healthy control (mean ± SD, * indicates p < 0.05 between groups, # indicates p < 0.05 from different frequencies).
Figure 5Comparison of the log(freq)-R slope between SCI and healthy control subjects.
Correlation analysis between clinical characteristics and electrical impedance myography (EIM) parameters.
| EIM parameters | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical data | X | Phase | Phase ratio | AR-R | Log(freq)-R slope | |||||
| RHO | RHO | RHO | RHO | RHO | ||||||
| Time since injury | −0.513 | 0.035* | −0.08 | 0.756 | 0.149 | 0.569 | 0.197 | 0.448 | 0.455 | 0.067 |
| Motor level | 0.185 | 0.478 | −0.08 | 0.747 | −0.363 | 0.152 | 0.119 | 0.647 | −0.23 | 0.374 |
RHO, rank correlation coefficient.
p: significant value with *<0.05.