Literature DB >> 28674109

Left Ventricular Assist Device Malfunctions: It Is More Than Just the Pump.

Robert L Kormos1, Michael McCall2, Andrew Althouse2, Luigi Lagazzi2, Richard Schaub2, Michael A Kormos2, Jared A Zaldonis2, Christopher Sciortino2, Kathleen Lockard2, Nicole Kuntz2, Elizabeth Dunn2, Jeffrey J Teuteberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) malfunction have focused on pump thrombosis. However, the device consists of the pump, driveline, and peripherals, all of which are potentially subject to failure.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all LVAD device malfunctions (DMs) occurring in rotary LVADs implanted at a single center between April 2004 and May 2016. Durable LVADs included 108 Heartmate II (HM II) and 105 HeartWare VAD (HVAD). DM data were categorized according to device type and into categories related to the component that failed: (1) controller, (2) peripheral components, and (3) implantable blood pump or its integral electric driveline. Pump-related events were analyzed as pump-specific (suspected or confirmed thrombosis) or nonpump-specific (driveline failure). DM rates were reported as events per 1000 patient-days, and Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event analyses. Cumulative rates of malfunction were examined for the main components of each type of LVAD.
RESULTS: Types of DM included controller failure (30%), battery failure (19%), or patient cable failure (14%), whereas only 13% were because of pump failure. DMs were more common in the HM II device (3.73 per 1000 patient-days versus 3.06 per 1000 patient-days for the HVAD, P<0.01). A higher rate of pump-specific malfunctions was discovered in those implanted with an HM II versus an HVAD (0.55 versus 0.39, respectively; P<0.01) and peripheral malfunctions (2.32 versus 1.78 for the HM II and HVAD, respectively; P<0.01); no difference occurred in the incidence of controller DM between the 2 LVADs. Patients with HVAD were 90% free of a pump-specific malfunction at 3 years compared with 56% for the HM II (log-rank P<0.003). Only 74% of the patients with HM II were free of pump thrombosis at 3 years compared with 90% of the patients with HVAD. Freedom from failure of the integrated driveline was 79% at 3 years for the HM II but 100% for the HVAD (log-rank P<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Device malfunction is much broader than pump failure alone and occurs for different components at different rates based on the type of LVAD.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  device malfunctions; heart-assist devices

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674109     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Left ventricular assist devices exchange: why, when and how to do it-experience from experts.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Anton Sabashnikov; Alexander Weymann; Mohamed Zeriouh; Achim Koch; Arjang Ruhparwar; Andre Ruediger Simon; Aron Frederik Popov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Unexpected Twists: A 61-Year-Old Male with Repeated HeartMate II Complications andSubsequent Replacement with HeartMate III.

Authors:  Amit Alam; Christo Mathew; Elie Dib; Aayla Jamil; Cesar Guerrero-Miranda; Brian Lima; Dan Meyer; Aldo Rafael; Shelley Hall; Susan Joseph
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Chugging to silent machines: development of mechanical cardiac support.

Authors:  Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 4.  [Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].

Authors:  Kevin Pilarczyk; Udo Boeken; Andreas Beckmann; Andreas Markewitz; P Christian Schulze; Martin Pin; Ingo Gräff; Sebastian Schmidt; Birk Runge; Hans-Jörg Busch; Michael R Preusch; Nils Haake; Gereon Schälte; Jan Gummert; Guido Michels
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Designing Biomaterial Platforms for Cardiac Tissue and Disease Modeling.

Authors:  Andrew House; Iren Atalla; Eun Jung Lee; Murat Guvendiren
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2020-10-16

6.  Eye Tracking Supported Human Factors Testing Improving Patient Training.

Authors:  Kerrin Elisabeth Weiss; Christoph Hoermandinger; Marcus Mueller; Marianne Schmid Daners; Evgenij V Potapov; Volkmar Falk; Mirko Meboldt; Quentin Lohmeyer
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Current perspectives on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Rene Schramm; Michiel Morshuis; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Boergermann; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Masatoshi Hata; Jan F Gummert
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Myocardial slices come to age: an intermediate complexity in vitro cardiac model for translational research.

Authors:  Fotios G Pitoulis; Samuel A Watson; Filippo Perbellini; Cesare M Terracciano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 10.  Heart Plasticity in Response to Pressure- and Volume-Overload: A Review of Findings in Compensated and Decompensated Phenotypes.

Authors:  Fotios G Pitoulis; Cesare M Terracciano
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.