| Literature DB >> 33768346 |
Kerrin Elisabeth Weiss1, Christoph Hoermandinger2, Marcus Mueller2, Marianne Schmid Daners3, Evgenij V Potapov2,4, Volkmar Falk2,4,5,6, Mirko Meboldt3, Quentin Lohmeyer3.
Abstract
The handling of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be challenging for patients and requires appropriate training. The devices' usability impacts patients' safety and quality of life. In this study, an eye tracking supported human factors testing was performed to reveal problems during use and test the trainings' effectiveness. In total 32 HeartWare HVAD patients (including 6 pre-VAD patients) and 3 technical experts as control group performed a battery change (BC) and a controller change (CC) as an everyday and emergency scenario on a training device. By tracking the patients' gaze point, task duration and pump-off time were evaluated. Patients with LVAD support ≥1 year showed significantly shorter BC task duration than patients with LVAD support <1 year (p = 0.008). In contrast their CC task duration (p = 0.002) and pump-off times (median = 12.35 s) were higher than for LVAD support patients <1 year (median = 5.3 s) with p = 0.001. The shorter BC task duration for patients with LVAD support ≥1 year indicate that with time patients establish routines and gain confidence using their device. The opposite effect was found for CC task duration and pump-off times. This implies the need for intermittent re-training of less frequent tasks to increase patients' safety.Entities:
Keywords: Emergency scenario; Eye tracking; Mechanical circulatory support; Pump-off time; Training; Usability
Year: 2021 PMID: 33768346 PMCID: PMC7994237 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01729-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Syst ISSN: 0148-5598 Impact factor: 4.460