Literature DB >> 28674000

Genome-wide screen for genes involved in eDNA release during biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus.

Alicia S DeFrancesco1, Nadezda Masloboeva1, Adnan K Syed1, Aaron DeLoughery1,2, Niels Bradshaw1, Gene-Wei Li2, Michael S Gilmore3,4, Suzanne Walker4, Richard Losick5.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of both nosocomial and community-acquired infection. Biofilm formation at the site of infection reduces antimicrobial susceptibility and can lead to chronic infection. During biofilm formation, a subset of cells liberate cytoplasmic proteins and DNA, which are repurposed to form the extracellular matrix that binds the remaining cells together in large clusters. Using a strain that forms robust biofilms in vitro during growth under glucose supplementation, we carried out a genome-wide screen for genes involved in the release of extracellular DNA (eDNA). A high-density transposon insertion library was grown under biofilm-inducing conditions, and the relative frequency of insertions was compared between genomic DNA (gDNA) collected from cells in the biofilm and eDNA from the matrix. Transposon insertions into genes encoding functions necessary for eDNA release were identified by reduced representation in the eDNA. On direct testing, mutants of some of these genes exhibited markedly reduced levels of eDNA and a concomitant reduction in cell clustering. Among the genes with robust mutant phenotypes were gdpP, which encodes a phosphodiesterase that degrades the second messenger cyclic-di-AMP, and xdrA, the gene for a transcription factor that, as revealed by RNA-sequencing analysis, influences the expression of multiple genes, including many involved in cell wall homeostasis. Finally, we report that growth in biofilm-inducing medium lowers cyclic-di-AMP levels and does so in a manner that depends on the gdpP phosphodiesterase gene.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; cyclic-di-AMP; eDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674000      PMCID: PMC5530685          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704544114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  The transcriptional regulators NorG and MgrA modulate resistance to both quinolones and beta-lactams in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Que Chi Truong-Bolduc; David C Hooper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Colony-morphology screening uncovers a role for the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nitrogen-related phosphotransferase system in biofilm formation.

Authors:  Matthew T Cabeen; Sara A Leiman; Richard Losick
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  A simple method of markerless gene deletion in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Fuminori Kato; Motoyuki Sugai
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.363

4.  agr-Dependent interactions of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 with human polymorphonuclear neutrophils.

Authors:  Yun Yun Pang; Jamie Schwartz; Matthew Thoendel; Laynez W Ackermann; Alexander R Horswill; William M Nauseef
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 7.349

5.  DNA-containing membrane vesicles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and their genetic transformation potential.

Authors:  Marika Renelli; Valério Matias; Reggie Y Lo; Terry J Beveridge
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kelly C Rice; Ethan E Mann; Jennifer L Endres; Elizabeth C Weiss; James E Cassat; Mark S Smeltzer; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effect of low temperature on growth and ultra-structure of Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  Laura A Onyango; R Hugh Dunstan; Johan Gottfries; Christof von Eiff; Timothy K Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impaired respiration elicits SrrAB-dependent programmed cell lysis and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ameya A Mashruwala; Adriana van de Guchte; Jeffrey M Boyd
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL murein hydrolase activities in cell division, autolysis, and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bose; McKenzie K Lehman; Paul D Fey; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A novel DNA-binding protein modulating methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Miriam Ender; Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Nadine McCallum
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  42 in total

1.  Biofilm formation - what we can learn from recent developments.

Authors:  T Bjarnsholt; K Buhlin; Y F Dufrêne; M Gomelsky; A Moroni; M Ramstedt; K P Rumbaugh; T Schulte; L Sun; B Åkerlund; U Römling
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Reconstitution of Staphylococcus aureus Lipoteichoic Acid Synthase Activity Identifies Congo Red as a Selective Inhibitor.

Authors:  Christopher R Vickery; B McKay Wood; Heidi G Morris; Richard Losick; Suzanne Walker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Biofilms: Architecture, Resistance, Quorum Sensing and Control Mechanisms.

Authors:  Priti Saxena; Yogesh Joshi; Kartik Rawat; Renu Bisht
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of CodY-Mediated Cell Aggregation in Staphylococcus aureus Reveals an Interaction between Extracellular DNA and Polysaccharide in the Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Kevin D Mlynek; Logan L Bulock; Carl J Stone; Luke J Curran; Marat R Sadykov; Kenneth W Bayles; Shaun R Brinsmade
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The Increased Accumulation of Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Factors Is Maximized in a purR Mutant by the Increased Production of SarA and Decreased Production of Extracellular Proteases.

Authors:  Duah Alkam; Piroon Jenjaroenpun; Aura M Ramirez; Karen E Beenken; Horace J Spencer; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  TMT proteomic analysis for molecular mechanism of Staphylococcus aureus in response to freezing stress.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Ying Xu; Yong Shen; Na Guo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  The Many Roles of the Bacterial Second Messenger Cyclic di-AMP in Adapting to Stress Cues.

Authors:  Tiffany M Zarrella; Guangchun Bai
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The Novel Streptococcal Transcriptional Regulator XtgS Negatively Regulates Bacterial Virulence and Directly Represses PseP Transcription.

Authors:  Guangjin Liu; Tingting Gao; Xiaojun Zhong; Jiale Ma; Yumin Zhang; Shiyu Zhang; Zongfu Wu; Zihao Pan; Yinchu Zhu; Huochun Yao; Yongjie Liu; Chengping Lu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 9.  Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Katrin Schilcher; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Repression of Capsule Production by XdrA and CodY in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mei G Lei; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.