Literature DB >> 32015143

Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of CodY-Mediated Cell Aggregation in Staphylococcus aureus Reveals an Interaction between Extracellular DNA and Polysaccharide in the Extracellular Matrix.

Kevin D Mlynek1, Logan L Bulock2, Carl J Stone1, Luke J Curran1, Marat R Sadykov2, Kenneth W Bayles2, Shaun R Brinsmade3.   

Abstract

The global regulator CodY links nutrient availability to the regulation of virulence factor gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus, including many genes whose products affect biofilm formation. Antithetical phenotypes of both biofilm deficiency and accumulation have been reported for codY-null mutants; thus, the role of CodY in biofilm development remains unclear. codY mutant cells of a strain producing a robust biofilm elaborate proaggregation surface-associated features not present on codY mutant cells that do not produce a robust biofilm. Biochemical analysis of the clinical isolate SA564, which aggregates when deficient for CodY, revealed that these features are sensitive to nuclease treatment and are resistant to protease exposure. Genetic analyses revealed that disrupting lgt (the diacylglycerol transferase gene) in codY mutant cells severely weakened aggregation, indicating a role for lipoproteins in the attachment of the biofilm matrix to the cell surface. An additional and critical role of IcaB in producing functional poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PIA) polysaccharide in extracellular DNA (eDNA)-dependent biofilm formation was shown. Moreover, overproducing PIA is sufficient to promote aggregation in a DNA-dependent manner regardless of source of nucleic acids. Taken together, our results point to PIA synthesis as the primary determinant of biofilm formation when CodY activity is reduced and suggest a modified electrostatic net model for matrix attachment whereby PIA associates with eDNA, which interacts with the cell surface via covalently attached membrane lipoproteins. This work counters the prevailing view that polysaccharide- and eDNA/protein-based biofilms are mutually exclusive. Rather, we demonstrate that eDNA and PIA can work synergistically to form a biofilm.IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus remains a global health concern and exemplifies the ability of an opportunistic pathogen to adapt and persist within multiple environments, including host tissue. Not only does biofilm contribute to persistence and immune evasion in the host environment, it also may aid in the transition to invasive disease. Thus, understanding how biofilms form is critical for developing strategies for dispersing biofilms and improving biofilm disease-related outcomes. Using biochemical, genetic, and cell biology approaches, we reveal a synergistic interaction between PIA and eDNA that promotes cell aggregation and biofilm formation in a CodY-dependent manner in S. aureus We also reveal that envelope-associated lipoproteins mediate attachment of the biofilm matrix to the cell surface.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CodY; PIA; Staphylococcus aureuszzm321990; biofilm; eDNA; exopolysaccharide; lipoproteins

Year:  2020        PMID: 32015143      PMCID: PMC7099133          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00593-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  106 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T F Mah; G A O'Toole
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  The genetic transformation machinery: composition, localization, and mechanism.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Claverys; Bernard Martin; Patrice Polard
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Development of competence for genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans in a chemically defined medium.

Authors:  Kunal Desai; Lauren Mashburn-Warren; Michael J Federle; Donald A Morrison
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Spx is a global effector impacting stress tolerance and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sünje Johanna Pamp; Dorte Frees; Susanne Engelmann; Michael Hecker; Hanne Ingmer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Role of BrnQ1 and BrnQ2 in branched-chain amino acid transport and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Julienne C Kaiser; Sameha Omer; Jessica R Sheldon; Ian Welch; David E Heinrichs
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  A F Gillaspy; S G Hickmon; R A Skinner; J R Thomas; C L Nelson; M S Smeltzer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 7.  Intersection of the stringent response and the CodY regulon in low GC Gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Tobias Geiger; Christiane Wolz
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 8.  Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 13.739

9.  A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Neill; Clarissa Pozzi; Patrick Houston; Hilary Humphreys; D Ashley Robinson; Anthony Loughman; Timothy J Foster; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Protein-based biofilm matrices in Staphylococci.

Authors:  Pietro Speziale; Giampiero Pietrocola; Timothy J Foster; Joan A Geoghegan
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.293

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interplay of CodY and CcpA in Regulating Central Metabolism and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Logan L Bulock; Jongsam Ahn; Dhananjay Shinde; Sanjit Pandey; Cleofes Sarmiento; Vinai C Thomas; Chittibabu Guda; Kenneth W Bayles; Marat R Sadykov
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.476

Review 2.  Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Katrin Schilcher; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Enzyme-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles to Target Staphylococcus aureus and Disperse Biofilms.

Authors:  Henry Devlin; Stephanie Fulaz; Dishon Wayne Hiebner; James P O'Gara; Eoin Casey
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  Human monoclonal antibodies against Staphylococcus aureus surface antigens recognize in vitro and in vivo biofilm.

Authors:  Lisanne de Vor; Bruce van Dijk; Kok van Kessel; Jeffrey S Kavanaugh; Carla de Haas; Piet C Aerts; Marco C Viveen; Edwin C Boel; Ad C Fluit; Jakub M Kwiecinski; Gerard C Krijger; Ruud M Ramakers; Freek J Beekman; Ekaterina Dadachova; Marnix Geh Lam; H Charles Vogely; Bart Ch van der Wal; Jos Ag van Strijp; Alexander R Horswill; Harrie Weinans; Suzan Hm Rooijakkers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The de novo Purine Biosynthesis Pathway Is the Only Commonly Regulated Cellular Pathway during Biofilm Formation in TSB-Based Medium in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Martin Gélinas; Léa Museau; Arielle Milot; Pascale B Beauregard
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-22

6.  Staphylococcus aureus utilizes environmental RNA as a building material in specific polysaccharide-dependent biofilms.

Authors:  Akio Chiba; Masahide Seki; Yutaka Suzuki; Yuki Kinjo; Yoshimitsu Mizunoe; Shinya Sugimoto
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 7.290

7.  Role of Extracellular DNA in Dalbavancin Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Biofilms in Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Authors:  Francesca Sivori; Ilaria Cavallo; Daniela Kovacs; Maria Guembe; Isabella Sperduti; Mauro Truglio; Martina Pasqua; Grazia Prignano; Arianna Mastrofrancesco; Luigi Toma; Fulvia Pimpinelli; Aldo Morrone; Fabrizio Ensoli; Enea Gino Di Domenico
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Antisense yycG modulates the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to hydrogen peroxide via the sarA.

Authors:  Shizhou Wu; Yunjie Liu; Lei Lei; Hui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Small-Molecule Compound SYG-180-2-2 to Effectively Prevent the Biofilm Formation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lulin Rao; Yaoguang Sheng; Jiao Zhang; Yanlei Xu; Jingyi Yu; Bingjie Wang; Huilin Zhao; Xinyi Wang; Yinjuan Guo; Xiaocui Wu; Zengqiang Song; Fangyou Yu; Lingling Zhan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.