Deborah E Linder1, Hannah C Siebens2, Megan K Mueller3, Debra M Gibbs2, Lisa M Freeman2. 1. Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA. Electronic address: Deborah.Linder@tufts.edu. 2. Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA. 3. Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA; Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted intervention (AAI) programs are increasing in popularity, but it is unknown to what extent therapy animal organizations that provide AAI and the hospitals and eldercare facilities they work with implement effective animal health and safety policies to ensure safety of both animals and humans. Our study objective was to survey hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations on their AAI policies and procedures. METHODS: A survey of United States hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations was administered to assess existing health and safety policies related to AAI programs. RESULTS: Forty-five eldercare facilities, 45 hospitals, and 27 therapy animal organizations were surveyed. Health and safety policies varied widely and potentially compromised human and animal safety. For example, 70% of therapy animal organizations potentially put patients at risk by allowing therapy animals eating raw meat diets to visit facilities. In general, hospitals had stricter requirements than eldercare facilities. DISCUSSION: This information suggests that there are gaps between the policies of facilities and therapy animal organizations compared with recent guidelines for animal visitation in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities with AAI programs need to review their policies to address recent AAI guidelines to ensure the safety of animals and humans involved.
BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted intervention (AAI) programs are increasing in popularity, but it is unknown to what extent therapy animal organizations that provide AAI and the hospitals and eldercare facilities they work with implement effective animal health and safety policies to ensure safety of both animals and humans. Our study objective was to survey hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations on their AAI policies and procedures. METHODS: A survey of United States hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations was administered to assess existing health and safety policies related to AAI programs. RESULTS: Forty-five eldercare facilities, 45 hospitals, and 27 therapy animal organizations were surveyed. Health and safety policies varied widely and potentially compromised human and animal safety. For example, 70% of therapy animal organizations potentially put patients at risk by allowing therapy animals eating raw meat diets to visit facilities. In general, hospitals had stricter requirements than eldercare facilities. DISCUSSION: This information suggests that there are gaps between the policies of facilities and therapy animal organizations compared with recent guidelines for animal visitation in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities with AAI programs need to review their policies to address recent AAI guidelines to ensure the safety of animals and humans involved.
Authors: Deborah E Linder; Megan K Mueller; Debra M Gibbs; Hannah C Siebens; Lisa M Freeman Journal: J Vet Med Educ Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Tomislav Majić; Hans Gutzmann; Andreas Heinz; Undine E Lang; Michael A Rapp Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Heidi DiSalvo; Donna Haiduven; Nancy Johnson; Valentine V Reyes; Carmen P Hench; Rosemary Shaw; David A Stevens Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Rita Finley; Carl Ribble; Jeff Aramini; Meredith Vandermeer; Maria Popa; Marcus Litman; Richard Reid-Smith Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: S L Lefebvre; D Waltner-Toews; A S Peregrine; R Reid-Smith; L Hodge; L G Arroyo; J S Weese Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Sandra L Lefebvre; Gail C Golab; E'lise Christensen; Louisa Castrodale; Kathy Aureden; Anne Bialachowski; Nigel Gumley; Judy Robinson; Andrew Peregrine; Marilyn Benoit; Mary Lou Card; Liz Van Horne; J Scott Weese Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Kathryn R Dalton; William Altekruse; Peter Campbell; Kathy Ruble; Karen C Carroll; Roland J Thorpe; Jacqueline Agnew; Meghan F Davis Journal: People Anim Date: 2022
Authors: Lieve Lucia Meers; Laura Contalbrigo; William Ellery Samuels; Carolina Duarte-Gan; Daniel Berckmans; Stephan Jens Laufer; Vicky Antoinette Stevens; Elizabeth Ann Walsh; Simona Normando Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-06-17
Authors: Kathryn R Dalton; Kaitlin B Waite; Kathy Ruble; Karen C Carroll; Alexandra DeLone; Pam Frankenfield; James A Serpell; Roland J Thorpe; Daniel O Morris; Jacqueline Agnew; Ronald C Rubenstein; Meghan F Davis Journal: Complement Ther Clin Pract Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: Antonio Santaniello; Susanne Garzillo; Alessia Amato; Mario Sansone; Alessandro Fioretti; Lucia Francesca Menna Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonio Santaniello; Mario Sansone; Alessandro Fioretti; Lucia Francesca Menna Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Deborah Linder; Carie Cardamone; Sean B Cash; John Castellot; Deborah Kochevar; Shuchi Dhadwal; Ellen Patterson Journal: One Health Date: 2020-02-10