Literature DB >> 16466831

Prevalence of zoonotic agents in dogs visiting hospitalized people in Ontario: implications for infection control.

S L Lefebvre1, D Waltner-Toews, A S Peregrine, R Reid-Smith, L Hodge, L G Arroyo, J S Weese.   

Abstract

Visitation of hospitalized people by dogs is becoming commonplace, but little is known about the potential health risks of introducing dogs to healthcare settings. This cross-sectional study evaluated the prevalence of zoonotic agents in a group of 102 visitation dogs from a variety of sources across Ontario. Between May and July 2004, owners were interviewed by a standardized questionnaire while dogs underwent a standardized physical examination. One specimen of faeces, hair-coat brushings and one rectal, aural, nasal, oral and pharyngeal swab were collected from each dog and tested for 18 specific pathogens. All dogs were judged to be in good health. Zoonotic agents were isolated from 80 out of 102 (80%) dogs. The primary pathogen was Clostridium difficile, which was isolated from 58 (58%) faecal specimens. Seventy-one percent (41/58) of these isolates were toxigenic. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli was isolated from one (1%) dog, extended-spectrum cephalosporinase E. coli was isolated from three (3%) dogs, and organisms of the genus Salmonella were isolated from three (3%) dogs. Pasteurella multocida or Pasteurella canis was isolated from 29 (29%) oral swabs, and Malassezia pachydermatis was isolated from eight (8%) aural swabs. Giardia antigen was present in the faeces of seven (7%) dogs, while Toxocara canis and Ancylostoma caninum were detected in two (2%) dogs and one (1%) dog, respectively. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Campylobacter spp., Microsporum canis, group A streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cryptosporidium spp. were not detected. Further information is needed before the full implications of these findings for infection control can be assessed properly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466831     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  34 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and control of infections in the home.

Authors:  John M Embil; Brenda Dyck; Pierre Plourde
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Development of T m -shift genotyping method for detection of cat-derived Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  Weida Pan; Yeqi Fu; Auwalu Yusuf Abdullahi; Mingwei Wang; Xianli Shi; Fang Yang; Xingang Yu; Xinxin Yan; Pan Zhang; Jianxiong Hang; Guoqing Li
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Multiple zoonotic pathogens identified in canine feces collected from a remote Canadian indigenous community.

Authors:  Chelsea G Himsworth; Stuart Skinner; Bonnie Chaban; Emily Jenkins; Brent A Wagner; N Jane Harms; Frederick A Leighton; R C Andrew Thompson; Janet E Hill
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  PCR-RFLP method to detect zoonotic and host-specific Giardia duodenalis assemblages in dog fecal samples.

Authors:  Liping Tan; Sheng Wu; Auwalu Yusuf Abdullahi; Xinggang Yu; Wei Hu; Meiran Song; Xianli Shi; Guoqing Li
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 6.  Escherichia coli and selected veterinary and zoonotic pathogens isolated from environmental sites in companion animal veterinary hospitals in southern Ontario.

Authors:  Colleen P Murphy; Richard J Reid-Smith; Patrick Boerlin; J Scott Weese; John F Prescott; Nicol Janecko; Lori Hassard; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Clostridium difficile: a new zoonotic agent?

Authors:  Alexander Indra; Heimo Lassnig; Nina Baliko; Peter Much; Anita Fiedler; Steliana Huhulescu; Franz Allerberger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  [Dermatomycoses due to pets and farm animals : neglected infections?].

Authors:  P Nenoff; W Handrick; C Krüger; T Vissiennon; K Wichmann; Y Gräser; G Tchernev
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.751

9.  Animal-assisted interventions: A national survey of health and safety policies in hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations.

Authors:  Deborah E Linder; Hannah C Siebens; Megan K Mueller; Debra M Gibbs; Lisa M Freeman
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 10.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.